1911

The interpretation of the constitutions of international organizations

Bu makalede uluslararası örgütlerin kurucu andlaşmalarının yorumu konusu incelenmiştir. Makalede 1969 Viyana Andlaşmalar Hukuku Sözleşmesi hükümleri çerçevesinde sözü edilen yorum metodları amaçsal yorum yönteminin önemi vurgulanarak değerlendirilmektedir.

Uluslararası örgütlerin kurucu andlaşmalarının yorumu

This article deals with the interpretation of the charters of international organizations. In the article the methods of interpretation stipulated in 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties examined by emphasizing the importance of teleological interpretation.

PDF

___

BOOKS
 Amerasinghe, C.F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) (1996).
 Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) (2000).
 White, N.D., The United Nations System: Toward International Justice (Boulder, Lynne Rienner) (2002).
CHAPTERS IN BOOKS
 Alvarez, J.E., ‘Constitutional Interpretation in International Organizations’ in J-M. Coicaud and V. Heiskanen (eds), The Legitimacy of International Organizations (Tokyo: United Nations University Press) (2001), p. 104-154.
 Ress, G., “The Interpretation of the Charter” in B. Simma (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: a commentary Vol. 1, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) (2002), p. 13-32.
JOURNAL ARTICLES
 Amerasinghe, C.F., “Interpretation of Texts in Open International Organizations” (1994) 65 British Yearbook of International Law, p. 175-209.
 Mcnair, A.D., “The Functions and Differing Legal Character of Treaties”, (1930) XI British Year Book of International Law, p. 100-118.
 Petersmann, E., “How to reform the UN system? Constitutionalism, International Law, and International Organizations.” (1997) 10 Leiden Journal of Internonational Law, p. 421-474.
 Teson, F. R., “Collective Humanitarian Intervention”, (1996) 17 Michigan Journal of International Law, p. 323-372.
CASES
 Competence of the International Labour Organization to Regulate Incidentally the Personal Work of the Employer, Advisory Opinion,PCIJ Series B No. 13, 1926, p.6.
 Jurisdiction of the European Commission of the Danube between Galatz and Braila, Advisory Opinion, PCIJ Series B. No. 14, 1927, p. 6.
 Admission of a State to the United Nations (Charter, Art. 4), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 1948, p.57.
 Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 1949, p. 174.
 Competence of Assembly Regarding Admission to the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 1950, p.4.
 Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1951, p. 15.
 Effect of Awards of Compensation Made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 1954, p. 47.
 Constitution of the Maritime Safety Committee of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 1960, p. 150.
 Certain Expenses of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 1962, p.151.
 Legal Consequences of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding the Security Council Resolution 276, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep.1971, p. 16.