Avrupa birliği temel haklar şartı'nın 53. maddesi'nin topluluk Hukukunun üstünlüğüne etkisi

Avrupa Birliği’nde insan hakları hukukunun çoğu zaman belirsizlikler yarattığı ifade edilmekte ve Birlik ile üye devletler arasında çatışmalara sebebiyet verdiği düşünülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, Temel Haklar Şartı, insan hakları hukukunun terminolojisini kullanarak mevcut gerilimi yumuşatmaktadır. Bu durum, Şart’ın Avrupa Birliği ve ulusal anayasal düzenler arasındaki mevcut dengeyi korumaya özen gösterdiğinin bir belirtisi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Ancak, Şart’ın 53. Maddesi’nde yer alan Koruma Düzeyi ile, bahsi geçen denge korunurken, aynı zamanda Topluluk hukukunun üstünlüğüne de bir etkide bulunduğu iddia edilmiştir. Öğretide, bu etkinin üstünlüğü koruduğu ya da bunu artırıcı veya azaltıcı olduğu yönündeki görüşler tartışmalıdır.

The effect of article 53 of charter of fundamental rights of european union on the supremacy of community law

It is argued that the human rights law concerning the European Union, frequently creates ambiguities and it is conceived that this situation causes confl icts between the Union and member states. In this regard, the Charter of Fundamental Rights alleviates this tension by using the wording of human rights law. This situation is accepted as a sign of the Charter’s intension to protect the balance between the European Union and national constitutions. But, while the balance in question is protected by the Level of Protection which is assured by the Article 53 of the Charter, it is also claimed that this Article has an effect on the supremacy of Community law. In the doctrine there are opinions which accept this effect as protecting, lowering or increasing the supremacy of Community law.

PDF

___

AHMED, T. and DE JESUS BUTLER, I., “The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective”, The European Journal of International Law, Vol: 17, No: 4, 2006, pp. 771-801.
Avrupa İçin Bir Anayasa Oluşturan Antlaşma: http://www.abgm.adalet. gov.tr/e-kutuph.htm (15.12.2008).
Avrupa Parlamentosu Resmi İnternet Sitesi: http://www.europarl.europa. eu/charter/default_en.htm (25.12. 2008).
BAŞLAR, K., “Avrupa Birliği’ne Katılım Sürecinde Türk Anayasası’nın Uyumlaştırılması Sorunu”, 2005, http://turkishweekly.net/turkce/makale. php?id=51, (06.11.2008).
BELLAMY, R., and SCHÖNLAU, J., “The Normality of Constitutional Politics: An Analysis of the Drafting of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights”, Constellations, Vol:11, No:3, 2004, pp. 412-433.
BENGTSSON, C., “Fundamental Rights in the European Community and Their Effect on the Principle of Supremacy-With Special Refl ection on the New Constitution for Europe”, Master’s Thesis within EC Law, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, 2006.
BESSELINK, L. F. M., “The Member States, the National Constituons and Scope of the Charter”, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol: 8, No: 1, 2001, pp.68-80.
CAROZZA, P. G., “The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Member States”, The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Politics Law and Policy, S. Pears and A. Ward (Eds.), Hart Publishing Co., Oxford, 2004, pp. 35-58.
Directorate General Internal Policies of the European Union, “Promoting and Protecting Fundamental Rights in the European Union: The Relations Between the European Convention of Human Rights, The European Charter and the EU Member States Constitutions”, Briefi ng Paper, September 2007, PE 393.251.
ERIKSEN, E. O., “Why a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights in the EU?”, Ratio Juris, Vol: 16, No: 3, September, 2003, pp. 352-373.
ERNE, J., “Discourse upon the Constituent Human Rights Developments in the European Union”, Juridica International, No:1, 2007, pp. 80-90.
European Court and Commission of Human Rights, A-246, Open Door Counseling v. Ireland, [1992].
European Court of Justice, (Case 1/58), Stork v High Authority, [1959].
(Case 4/73), Nold v Commission, [1974].
(Case 6/64), Costa v. ENEL, [1964].
(Case 11/70), Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, [1970].
(Case 26/62), Van Gend en Loos, [1963].
(Case 29/69), Stauder, [1969].
(Case 36/75), Rutili, [1975].
(Case 106/77), Simmenthal, [1978].
(Case 149/77), Defrenne, [1978].
(Case C-159/90, SPUC v. Grogan, [1991].
(Case T-54/99), Max.mobil Telekommunikation Service v Commission, [2002].
GIUBBONI, S., “Fundamental Social Rights in the European Union: Problems of Protection and Enforcement”, Italian Labour Law eJournal, 2003, pp. 1-23, http://www.labourjournal.it, (14.12.2008).
GÜNUĞUR, H., Avrupa Topluluğu Hukuku, Tarhan Basımevi, Ankara, 1993.
KARAKAŞ, I., “Ulusalüstü Anayasada Temel Haklar Problematiği: Teori ve Pratik Sorunlar”, 2005, www.anayasa.gov.tr/eskisite/anyarg22/ısıl.pdf, (06.11.2008).
LAWSON, R., “The Irish Abortion Cases: European Limits to National Sovereignty?”, European Journal of Health Law, Vol: 1, No:2, 1994, pp. 167-186.
LIISBERG, J. B., “Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law?”, Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 04/01, 2001,
http:// www.jeanmonnet program.org/ papers/01/010401.html , (24.10.2008).
Official Journal of the European Union, C 103, 27. 04. 1977.
Official Journal of the European Union, C 364, Vol: 43, 18.12.2000.
Official Journal of the European Union, C 306, Vol: 50, 17. 12. 2007.
TAŞDEMİR, H. ve DEMİR, H., “Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Şartı”, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt:2, No:3, 2002, 85-100.