Laparoskopik kolesistektomiden açık kolesistektomiye dönülen hastalarda preoperatif risk faktörleri ve intraoperatif nedenler: 536 hastanın retrospektif analizi

Amaç: Kolelitiazis hastalarında laparoskopik kolesistektomi (LK) altın standart bir tedavi yöntemi olmakla beraber açık ameliyata dönüş riski bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı LK’dan açık kolesistektomiye dönüş (LKAD) nedenlerini incelemek ve açığa geçişteki faktörleri değerlendirmektir. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesinde 2002 Mayıs ve 2006 Mayıs tarihleri arasında LK yapılan ve kayıtları incelenen 536 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar LK yapılanlar (grup 1, n = 492) ve laparoskopik kolesistektomiden açık ameliyata dönülenler (grup 2, n = 44) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Gruplarda yer olan hastaların demografik özellikleri [yaş, cinsiyet, vücut kitle indeksi (BMI-), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) skorları] klinik hikayeleri, geçirilmiş abdominal ameliyatları, preoperatif laboratuar, abdominal ultrasonografi ve endoskopik retrograd kolanjiyopankreatikografi (ERCP) sonuçları, intraoperatif bulguları retrospektif olarak risk faktörleri açısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 536 hastanın 44’ünde (%8.3) açık ameliyata dönüldüğü tespit edildi. LK grubunda yaş ortalaması 49.5±12.6, LKAD grubunda 52.7±15.6 olarak tespit edildi (P> 0.05). Preoperatif beyaz küre yüksekliği, abdominal ultrasonografi incelemesinde safra kesesi kalınlığında artma (≥ 5 mm) ve perikolesistik sıvı varlığı açık ameliyata dönüşte prediktif faktörler olarak belirlendi. İntraoperatif değerlendirmede yüksek adezyon skoru (grade IV), Callot diseksiyonunda zorluk, akut kolesistit görünümü ve kanama açık ameliyata dönüş nedenleri olarak tespit edildi. Sonuç ve Tartışma: Cerrah, preoperatif ve özellikle intraoperatif riski artıran durumları iyi değerlendirmeli ve bunların varlığında ameliyatın hazırlık aşamasından itibaren ameliyatın sağlıklı şekilde yapılabilmesi için gerekeni sağlamalıdır

Preoperative risk factors and intraoperative reasons for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: retrospective analysis of 536 cases

Purpose: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment modality for cholelithiasis, there is still a risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reasons for conversion from LC to open cholecystectomy (LCOC) and investigate the risk factors. Patients and Methods: A total of 536 patients who had been operated on for cholelithiasis in Gazi University School of Medicine between May 2002 and May 2006 and whose data were available were enrolled in the study. Patients were grouped as group 1 (n = 492), which was composed of patients who had undergone LC, and group 2 (n = 44), which was composed of patients who had undergone LCOC. Patients were retrospectively evaluated according to their demographic characteristics [age, sex, body mass index (BMI)) ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology] scores, clinical histories, previous abdominal operations, preoperative laboratory findings, abdominal ultrasonography (US), preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), and intraoperative findings. Results: LCOC had been performed in 44 patients (8.3%). Mean age was 49.5±12.6 in the LC group and 52.7±15.6 in the LCOC group (P> 0.05). Preoperative high levels of white blood cells, increased gall bladder wall thickness (≥ 5 mm), and the existence of pericholecystic fluid in abdominal US were the predictive factors for LCOC. High adhesion score (grade IV), difficulty in Callot dissection, appearance of acute cholecystitis, and bleeding were the intraoperative reasons for LCOC. Conclusion: LCOC is not regarded as a complication. The surgeon has to manage the operation plan evaluating the preoperative and especially intraoperative factors.

___

  • 1. Borly L, Anderson IB, Bardram L, Christensen E, Sehested A, Kehlet H, Matzen P, Rehfeld JF, Stage P, Toftdahl DB, Gernow A, Hojgaard L. Preoperative prediction model of outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 1144-1152.
  • 2. Fried GM, Barkun JS, Sigman HH, Joseph L, Clas D, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Meakins JL. Factors determinig conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1994; 167: 35-41.
  • 3. Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M. et al. A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 520-525.
  • 4. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Chu KM. Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 98-101.
  • 5. Kanaan SA, Murayama KM, Merriam LT, Dawes LG, Prystowsky JB, Rege RV, Joehl RJ. Risk for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 2002; 106: 20-24.
  • 6. Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, Marin P, Torralba JA, Garcia-Ayllon J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg. 1998; 133: 173-175.
  • 7. Wiebke EA, Pruitt AL, Howard TJ, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Goulet RJ Jr, Canal DF. Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. An analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 742-745.
  • 8. Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: A 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 800-805.
  • 9. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 2001; 15: 261-269.
  • 10. Sanabria JR, Gallinger S, Croxford R, Strazberg SM. Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179: 696-704.
  • 11. Wallace DH, O’Dwyer PJ. Effect of no-conversion policy on patient outcome following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1680-1682.
  • 12. McGinn FP, Miles AJ, Uglow M, Ozmen M, Terzi C, Humby M. Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and minicholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1374-1377.
  • 13. Rattner DW, Fergusan C, Warshaw AL. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 233-236.
  • 14. Blauer KL, Collins RL. The effect of intraperitoneal progestrone on postoperative adhesion formation in rabbits. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:144-149.
  • 15. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly. World J Surg 1997; 20: 983-987.
  • 16. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 609-620.
  • 17. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 254-258.
  • 18. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai EC, Wong J. Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 513-517.
  • 19. Zisman A, Gold-Deutch R, Zisman E, Negri M, Halpern Z, Lin G, Halevy A.A. Is male gender a risk factor for conversion of laparoscopic into open cholecystectomy? Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 892-894.
  • 20. Schafer M, Krahenbuhl L, Buchler MW. Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 291-297.
  • 21. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MJ, Goresky CA, Meakins JL. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini-cholesistectomy. Lancet 1992; 340: 1116-1119.
  • 22. Hutchinson CH, Traverso LW, Lee FT. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Do preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open? Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 875-888.
  • 23. Nair RG, Dunn DC, Fowler S, McCloy RF. Progress with cholecystectomy: improving results in England and Wales. Br J Surg 1997;84: 1396-1398.
  • 24. Wongworawat MD, Aitken DR, Robles AE, Garberoglio C. The impact of prior intra-abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 1994; 60: 763-765.
  • 25. Lau H, Brooks DC. Predictive factors for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 1150-1153.
  • 26. Sakuramoto S, Sato S, Okuri T, Sato K, Hiki Y, Kakita A. Preoperative evaluation to predict technical difficultties of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the basis of histological inflammation findings on resected gallbaldder. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 114-121.
  • 27. Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and proabilty of complictions be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:755-760.
  • 28. Limbosch JM, Druart ML, Puttemans T, Melot C. Guidelines to laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Acta Chir Belg 2000;100: 198-204.
  • 29. Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1997; 21: 629-633.
  • 30. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 18: CD006231
Gazi Medical Journal-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Laparoskopik kolesistektomiden açık kolesistektomiye dönülen hastalarda preoperatif risk faktörleri ve intraoperatif nedenler: 536 hastanın retrospektif analizi

Murat AKIN, Bülent SALMAN, Mustafa ŞARE, Cem AZILI, Utku YILMAZ, Tugan TEZCANER, Ertan TATLICIOĞLU

Idıopathic scrotal calcinosis with polypoid appearance

Mubin HOŞNUTER, Sacide ÇOLAK, Gamze Numanoğlu YURDAKAN, Banu D. GÜN, Süheyla BOSTAN, Oğuz ÖZDAMAR

A maternal death complicated by systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report

Ruhuşen KUTLU, Selma ÇİVİ

Complement-1 inhibitor attenuates myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury in a guinea pig model

Sedat KALAYCIOĞLU, Eser OZ, Yıldırım IMREN, Gulbin AYGENCEL, Timothy P. MARTENS, Ariel A. BENSON, Mustafa ARSLAN

Cat eye sendromu: olgu sunumu

Filiz EKİCİ, Emrah ŞENEL, Mustafa TEKİN, Sevim ÜNAL, H. Gözde KANMAZ, Ebru ARHAN

Ovarian cavernous hemangioma: a case report and review of the literature with reference to controversial pathological diagnoses

Berna SAVAŞ, Murat SÖNMEZER, Koray CEYHAN, Güldal YILMAZ, Sibel PERÇİNEL

Lipid peroxıdatıon and the antıoxıdant capacıty of dıalysıs patıents: the effects of a single hemodialysis session with different dialysis membranes

Murat YILMAZ, Sevsen KULAKSİZOĞLU, Turgay ARINSOY, Ülver DERİCİ, Şükrü SİNDEL, Fatma Ayerden EBİNÇ

Pierre Robin sendromlu (Sekanslı) yenidoğanda anestezi indüksiyonunda gözlenen havayolu problemi

Selahattin ÖZMEN, Kemal FINDIKÇIOĞLU, Gizem KÖKTEN, Berrin GÜNAYDIN

Invasive group a beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection in children in the 2000'S: a case report

Mehmet DOĞAN, Sedef TUNAOĞLU, Berna CANTER, Murat ELLİ, Cağlar CİTAK

An alternative animal markıng method: use of haır-dye

Deniz ISCEN, M. Tonguc ISKEN, H. Ege OZGENTAŞ, Cenk SEN