Study by light and scanning electron microscopy of the fungiform Papillae on tongue of the porcupine (Hystrix cristata)
Bu çalışma, oklu kirpi dilindeki papilla fungiformis ve tat tomurcuklarının dağılımı, ışık ve elektron mikroskobik yapılarının belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Oklu kirpinin dilinin ön kısmında ince uzun bir çıkıntı bulunmaktaydı ve dilin ucu yuvarlaktı. Papilla fungiformis’ler mantar şeklindeydi ve squamöz epitel ile örtülüydü. Papilla fungiformis’ler üst orta çizgide ve dilin ucunda bulunmamaktaydı. Orta bölgede her iki yan kenar boyunca dağılmışlardı. Papillalar dilin en çok arka 1/3 ünde görülmekteydi. Oklu kirpinin dilindeki papilla fungiformis’lerin %99’u tat tomurcuğu içermekteydi. Hemen hemen her papilla 4 veya 5 tat tomurcuğu kapsamaktaydı. Bununla birlikte, bazıları bir tat tomurcuğuna sahipti ve nisbeten çok az papillada tat tomurcuğu bulunmamaktaydı
Oklu kirpi (Hystrix cristata) dilindeki Papilla fungiformis’lerin ışık ve scanning elektron mikroskobuyla incelenmesi
The objective of this study was to determine the distribution and the structure of their taste buds and fungiform papillae on the porcupine’s tongue by light and scanning electron microscopy. The tongue of the porcupine had a slender anterior protrusion and the tip of the tongue was round. The fungiform papillae were mushroom in shape and covered squamous epithelium. The fungiform papillae were absent on the dorsal midline and apex of the tongue. They were scattered along both lateral edges of the dorsal surface in the middle region. The highest distribution of papillae was on the posterior one-thirds of the tongue. In tongues of the porcupine, 99% of all fungiform papillae contained taste bud. Almost every fungiform papillae typically had four or five taste buds. However, occasionally some had a taste bud at its center, and relatively few papillae were without taste buds.
___
- 1. Kuru M. Omurgalı Hayvanlar. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniv. Basımevi, 1987: 577-580.
- 2. Demirsoy A. Yaşamın Temel Kuralları. Ankara: Meteksan Anonim Şirketi, 1992: 759-760.
- 3. Dinc G, Girgin A, Yılmaz, S. Ratlarda papilla fungiformis’in prenatal ve postnatal gelişimi. F Ü Sağlık Bil Derg 1995; 9 (2): 161-163.
- 4. Iwasaki S, Yoshizawa H, Kawahara I. Study by scanning electron microscopy of the morphogenesis of three types of lingual papilla in the rat. The Anatomical Record 1997; 247: 528-541.
- 5. Miller IJ, Preslar AJ. Spatial distribution of rat fungiform papillae. Anat Rec 1974 ; 181: 679-684.
- 6. Miller IJ. Taste bud distribution and regional responsiveness on tne anterior tongue of the rat. Physi Behav 1976 ; 16: 439-544.
- 7. Mistretta CM, Baum, BJ, Quantitative study of taste buds in fungiform and circumvallate papillae of young and aged rats. J Anat 1984; 138: 323-332.
- 8. Mistretta CM. Oakley IA. Quantitative anatomical study of taste buds in fungiform papillae of young and old fischer rats. Journal of Gerontology.1986; 41: 315-318.
- 9. Iwasaki S, Miyata K. Kobayashi K. The surface structure of the dorsal epithelium of tongue in the mouse. Acta Anat Nippon1987; 62: 69-76.
- 10. Iwasaki S, Yoshizawa H, Kawahara, I. Study by scanning electron microscopy of the morphogenesis of three types of lingual papilla in the mouse. Acta Anat 1996; 157: 41-52.
- 11. Whitehead MC, Kachele DL. Development of fungiform papillae, taste buds and their innervation in the hamster. The J of Comp Neurol.1994; 340: 515-530.
- 12. Miller I.J, Smith DV.. Quantitative taste bud distribution in the hamster. Physiology& Behavior, 1984; 32, 275-285.
- 13. Parks JD, Whitehead MC. Scanning electron microscopy of denervated taste buds in hamster: Morphology of fungiform taste pores. The Anatomical Record 1998; 251: 230-239.
- 14. Kobayashi K. Three- dimensional architecture of the connective tissue core of the lingual papillae in the guinea pig. Anat Embryol 1990; 182: 205-213.
- 15. Emura S, Tamada A, Hayakawa D, et al. Sem study on the dorsal lingual surface of the flying squirrel, Annals of Anatomy 1999; 181: 495-598.
- 16. Krause WJ. Cutts JH. Morphological observations on the papillae of opossum tongue. Acta Anat 1982; 113:159-168.
- 17. Iwasaki S, Miyata K, Kobayashi, K. Scanningelectron- microscopic study of the dorsal lingual surface of the squirrel monkey. Acta Anat 1988; 132: 225-229.
- 18. Kubota K. Fukuda N. Comparative Anatomical and Neurohistological Observations on the tongue of the porcupine (Hystrix cristata). Anat Rec 1966; 155: 261-268.