SITC Teknoloji Sınıflandırmasına İlişkin Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlüklerin Belirlenmesi: Türkiye ve Diğer N-11 Ülkelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Projeksiyonlara göre 20-30 yil içinde G-7 ekonomilerinin büyüklüğüne ulaşmasi beklenen BRIC ülkeleri (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin) yükselen ekonomiler arasinda lokomotif konumunda yer almaktadir. Ekonomik büyüklükleri, global piyasalardaki etkileri ve gelişmiş ülkeler üzerinde oluşturduklari tehdit bakimindan BRIC ülkeleri kadar etkili olmasa da; N-11 (geri kalan yükselen ekonomiler) ekonomileri olarak adlandirilan ülkelerin de dikkatle incelenmesi gerekmektedir.Çalişmada, 1993-2009 yillari arasinda, Türkiye ve diğer N-11 ülkelerinin açiklanmiş karşilaştirmali üstünlük katsayilari SITC Teknoloji Siniflandirmasina göre hesaplanmiştir. Çalişmada elde edilen sonuçlar, Türkiye'nin dünya piyasalarindaki ihracat payinin artmasinda emek yoğun mallarla birlikte sermaye yoğun mallarin da önemli etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. N-11 ekonomilerinin ihraç ettiği mallardaki en yüksek açiklanmiş karşilaştirmali üstünlük katsayilari daha çok hammadde ve emek yoğun mallarin ihracatinda ortaya çikmaktadir. Bununla birlikte, katma değeri yüksek zor taklit edilen araştirma bazli mallarin ihracatindaki karşilaştirmali üstünlüklerde en üst sira Filipinler'e aittir. İlk siradaki Filipinler'i Güney Kore ve Meksika takip etmektedir

Determining the Revealed Comparative Advantages Related to SITC Technology Classification: The Comparison With Turkey and Other N-11 Countries

The countries expressed as emerging economies previously. According to the projections, within 20-30 years, BRICS which is expected to the economic size of G7 countries are the leading position among emerging economies. Even if their economic size, the effects of global markets and having create a threat on developed countries are not as effective as the BRIC countries, the countries so-called N-11 (the rest of the emerging economies) must be examined carefully as well.In this study, between the years 1993-2009, the revealed comparative advantage indices of Turkey and Other N-11 countries are calculated on SITC technology classification. The results show that the capital-intensive goods with the labor-intensive goods have a significant impact on the rise of Turkey’s exports share in the world trade. When technological equipment of export of N-11 economies examine, it is seen that the highest revealed comparative advantage indexes mostly come out in the export of raw material and labor intensive goods. According to the findings about comparative advantages of the export of hard to imitate research-based goods that have the highest added value and technological equipment, the Philippines belong to the upper row. Philippines is followed by South Korea and Mexico

___

  • AKGÜNGÖR, Sedef, BARBAROS, Funda ve KUMRAL, Neşe; (2001), “Türkiye’ de Sebze ve Meyve İşleme Sanayiinin Avrupa Birliği Piyasasında Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Gücü Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, T.C. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı- Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü, 51, Ankara, ss.1-85.
  • AMIGHINI, Alessia; (2005), “China in the International Fragmentation of Production:Evidence from the ICT Industry”, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2(2), pp.203- 219.
  • BALASSA, Bela; (1965), “Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage”, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2), pp.99-123.
  • BATRA, Amita and KHAN, Zeba; (2005), “Revealed Comparative Advantage: An Analysis for India and China”, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Working Paper, 168, New Delhi, pp.1-85.
  • BEKMEZ, Selahattin; (2008), Türkiye Avrupa Birliği Sektörel Rekabet Analizleri, Nobel Yay., Ankara.
  • BENINGO, Steven; (2005), “Trade and Transportation Between the United States and China,and Between the United States and India”, 2006 Conference of the Society of Government Economists , Washington, p.6.
  • CHANG, Ching-Cheng; (1999), “A Partial Equilibrium Analysis on the Effects of Trade Liberalization in APEC Food Sector”, APEC Study Centre Consortium-1999 Conference, The APEC Food System and its Implications, Auckland, p.3.
  • ERK, Nejat; (1987), “Revealed Comparative Advantage and Protectionist Policies- An Analysis of Turkey’ s Foreign Trade in 1980”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), Adana, ss.3-8.
  • FİLİZTEKİN, Alpay; (2009), “Türkiye’nin Dış Ticarette Rekabet Gücü-Seçilmiş Ülkeler, Sektörler, Mal Grupları ve Endeksler Bazında Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz”, TÜSİAD, İstanbul, ss.1-52.
  • HINLOOPEN, Jeroen and MARREWIJK, Charles Van; (2004), “P-P Plots and the Harmonic Mass Indeks: An Application to Comparative Advantage”, 30 July 2004 Seminar at the University of Adelaide, Australia, p.3.
  • HINLOOPEN, Jeroen and MARREWIJK, Charles Van; (2001), “On the Empirical Distribution of the Balassa Index”, Review of World Economics, 137(1), p.13.
  • HUFBAUER, Garry and Chilas, John; (1974), “Specialization by Industrial Countries: Extent and Consequences”, The International Division of Labour: Problems and Perspectives-International Symposium, Germany, pp.3-38.
  • KÜÇÜKKİREMİTÇİ, Oktay; (2006), “Sanayi Sektörünün Dış Ticaret Performansının Rekabet Gücüne Göre Değerlendirilmesi (1995-2005 Dönemi)”, T.C. İnönü Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Ulusal Bağımsızlık İçin Türkiye İktisat Politikaları Kurultayı, Malatya, ss.1-24.
  • LI, Kui-Wai and BENDER, Siegfried; (2002), “The Gain and Loss of Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Exports Among Regions”, Department of Economics and Finance and APEC Study Center-Annual Consortium Conference, Merida, Mexico, pp.1-29.
  • LING, B.H., LEUNG, P.S. and SHANG, Y.C.; (1996), “Export Performance of Major Cultured Shrimp Producers in the Japanese and US Markets”, Aquaculture Research 27, pp.775-785.
  • MESSINA, William A.; (2001), “Cuba:A view of Revealed Export Advantage”, Cuba in Transition, ASCE, p.154.
  • MYKHNENKO, Vlad; (2005), “What Type of Capitalism in Eastern Europe?Institutional Structures,Revealed Comparative Advantages,and Performance of Poland and Ukraine”, Centre for Public Policy for Regions (CPPR) Discussion Paper, 6, p.27.
  • O’NEILL, Jim and STUPNYTSKA, Anna; (2009), “The Long Term Outlook for he BRICs and N-11 Post Crisis”, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics Paper, 192, p.4.
  • PRASAD, Raymond N.; (2004), “Fiji’s Export Competitiveness:A Comparison with Selected Small Island Developing States”, Economics Department Reserve Bank of Fiji-Working Paper, Fiji, p.11.
  • RAMIREZ, Jorge; (2002), “Impact of Free Trade Agreements (FTA) on Competitiveness:Identifying and Preparing for Threats and Opportunities”, International Business Strategies in Latin America-Sumaq Summit 04, Colombia, p.12.
  • RENARD, Thomas; (2009), “A BRIC in the World: Emerging Powers, Europe and the Coming Order”, EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations, 31, pp.1-46.
  • SEYMEN, Dilek Aykut; (2009), Türkiye’nin Dış Ticaret Yapısı ve Rekabet Gücü, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yay., İzmir.
  • SINGH, P.B.Rana; (1988), “Shifting Revealed Comparative Advantage: Experiences of Asian and Pacific Developing Countries”, Asian Development Bank, Report, 42, pp.1-21.
  • VITUNSKIENE, Vlada and SERVA, Evaldas; (2005), “Revealed Comparative Advantage in Lithuanian Dairy Sector”, XLUA Research Papers, 21(68), p.1.
  • WIDGREN, Mika; (2006), “Challenges Created by the New EU Member States and Third Countries”, Prime Minister’s Office Economic Council of Finland, Finland, p.8.
  • WANG, Zhi and VOLLRATH, Tom; (2000), “The Impact of Distance on U.S. Agricultural Exports:An Econometric Analysis”, Technological Changes, Transportation Sector/MP-1566, Economic Research Service/USDA, p.76.
  • WILSON, D., KELSTON Alex L. and SWARNALI, Ahmed; (2010), “Is This the BRICs Decade?”, Goldman Sachs, BRICs Monthly, 10(3), p.1.
  • WILSON, D. and STUPNYTSKA, Anna; (2007), “The N-11: More Than an Acronym”, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics Paper, 153, p.1.
  • WOLFF, Edward N.; (2000), “Has Canada Specialized in the Wrong Manufacturing Industries?”, CSLS Conference on the Canada-US Manufacturing Productivity Gap,85, Ontorio, Canada, pp.1-33.
  • International Trade Statistics-2010, http://tr.wikipedia.org/ wiki/N_11, 02.04.2011.
  • http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870339660457 6088061911843514.html, 15.04.2011.
  • UNITED NATIONS, http://comtrade.un.org/, 11.03.2011.
  • http://www.globelicsindia2006.org/Veeramani.pdf, 11.01.2008.