Gibrat yasasının geçerliliğinin panel ve dinamik panel tahmin yöntemi ile sınanması

İşletmelerin büyümelerini etkileyen birçok faktör bulunmaktadır. Bu faktörlere en genel anlamda işletmenin mevcut büyüklüğü, yaşı, sahiplik yapısı, yönetim şekli, ar-ge faaliyetlerinde bulunup bulunmaması örnek verilebilir. Bu faktörler içerisinde daha çok, işletmenin mevcut büyüklüğünü dikkate alan çalışmalar gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlk defa Gibrat (1931) tarafından araştırılan büyüme büyüklük ilişkisi, elde edilen sonuçlardan hareketle literatürde Gibrat yasası olarak yerini almıştır. Bu bağlamda, Gibrat yasası büyüme ve büyüklük arasındaki ilişkinin tesadüfî süreçler ile açıklanabildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Diğer bir ifade ile, Gibrat yasasına göre, işletmelerin büyümeleri mevcut büyüklüklerinden bağımsızdır. Bu çalışmada, Gibrat yasasının geçerliliği, 1997 – 2006 dönemleri arası İstanbul Sanayi Odasının (ISO) belirlediği en büyük 1000 işletme içerisinden, örneklem döneminde faaliyetini sürekli sürdürmüş olan 127 işletme için sınanmıştır. Çalışmada, işletme büyüklüğünün göstergesi olarak, çalışan sayısı, net aktifler, özsermaye, üretimden satışlar değişkenleri ayrı ayrı değerlendirilerek analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Panel ve dinamik panel tahmin yönteminin kullanıldığı analizlerden elde edilen sonuçlara göre, örneklemdeki işletmeler için Gibrat yasasının geçerli olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Testing Gibrat’s law with panel and dynamic panel data approach

It is possible to find out several factors which effects firm growth. Generally size, age, ownership structure, corporate governance, research and development policy are accepted as basic factors of firm growth. The effect of firm size on firm growth is one of the most researched topics of finance literature. This topic is researched by Gibrat (1931) for the first time and replaced as Law of Gibrat with depending to its results. Gibrat’s Law emphasizes that firm size and firm growth relation can be explained as a random process. In other words, the growth rate of a given firm is independent of its size. In this study the validity of Gibrat’s law is researched on the sample of 127 companies which is registered to Istanbul Chamber of Industry (ICI) 1000 between 1997 and 2006 continuously. With respect to previous studies, number of employment, net assets, capital employed, sales volumes are used as proxies for firm size separately. For testing Gibrats’s law, panel and dynamic panel approach is employed. According to results, Gibrats law fails to hold on the sample

___

  • AHN, S. ve P. SCHMIDT (1995), "Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data", Journal of Econometrics, c.68. pp. 5-28.
  • ALMUS, M. ve E. A. NERUNGER (2000), "Testing Gibrats law for young firms - empirical results for West Germany," Small Business Economics, c. 15. pp. 1-12.
  • ANDERSON, T. W. ve C. HSIAO (1982), "Estimation of dynamic panel models with error components," Journal of the American Statistical Association, c.76. pp. 74-82.
  • ARELLANO, M. ve S. R. BOND (1991), "Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations," Review of Economic Studies, c.58,pp. 271'-97.
  • ARELLANO, M. (2003), Panel Data Econometrics, Oxford: Oxford University Prepp.
  • AUDRETSCH D.B., L. KLOMP, E. SANTARELLI ve A.R. THURIK (2004), "Gibrat's law: are the services different?," Review of Industrial Organization, c.24. pp.301 - 324.
  • BALTAGI, B. H. (2001), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2nd edition), UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • BOND, S. R. (2002), "Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice," Cenmap Working Paper, (Seri No: CWP09/02).
  • BOWSHER, C. (2000), "On Testing Overidentifying Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models", Working paper 2000-W28, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
  • CALVO, J. L (2006), "Testing Gibrat's law for small, young, and innovating firms", Small Business Economics, c.26. pp.117-123.
  • CHESHER, A. (1979), "Testing the law of proportonare effect," The Journal of Industrial Economics, c.27. S.4. pp. 403 -411.
  • CHU, H.P, P. J. SHER ve M. L. YEH (2008), "Revisiting Gibrat's law using panel SURADF tests," Applied Economic Letters, c.15. pp.137-143.
  • COAD, A. (2007), "Firm growth: a survey," Papers on Economics and Evolution, (Seri No:#0703).
  • COONEY, T. M. ve P. MALINEN (2004), "Firm growth as a research issue," First Internet Online Publication, European Council for Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
  • CYERT, R. M. ve J. G. MARCH. (1963), 1963/1992. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd edition Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • DELMAR,F., P. DAVIDSSON, W.B. GARTNER (2003), "Arriving at the high - growth firm," Journal of Business Venturing, c.18. pp.189-216.
  • DOĞUKANLI, Hatice, Mehmet ÖZMEN, Ömer İSKENDEROĞLU; (2008), "İşletme Büyüklüğü ile Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Analizi: Türkiye İmalat Sanayi Üzerine Bir İnceleme", Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 45 (522), pp. 69 - 82.
  • DROUCOPOULOS, V. (1983), "International big business revisited: on the size and growth of the world's largest firms", Managerial and Decision Economics, c.4. pp.244-252.
  • DUNNE, P., A. HUGHES (1994), "Age size growth and survival : UK companies in the 1980s", The Journal of Industrial Economics, c. 42. S.2. pp.115-140.
  • EVANS, D. S. (1987a), "Tests of alternative theories of firm growth," The Journal of Political Economy, c.95. S.4. pp.657-674.
  • EVANS, D. S. (1987b), "The relationship between firm growth, size and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries," The Journal of Industrial Economics, c.35. S.4. pp.567 -581.
  • FOTOPOULOS, G. ve H. LOURI (2001), "Corporate growth and FDI: are multinationals stimulating local industrial development?", CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 3128.
  • GEBREEYESUS, M. (2006), "Essays on firm turnover, growth and investment behavior in Ethiopian manufacturing", Ph.d Thesis, Department of Economics School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Sweden.
  • GEROSKI, PA, S. LAZAROVA, G. URGA ve C. F.WALTERS (2003), "Are differences in firm size transitory or permanent," Journal of Applied Econometrics, c.18. pp.47-59.
  • GEROSKI, P. A. (1999) "The Growth of Firms in Theory and in Practice," CEPR Discussion Paper Series No.2092.
  • GLANCEY, K. (1998), "Determinants of growth and profitability in small entreprenurial firms," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, c.4. S.1. pp. 18-27.
  • GODDARD, J., J. WILSON ve P. BLANDON (2002), "Panel Tests of Gibrat's Law for Japanese Manufacturing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, c.20. pp.415-433.
  • GODDARD, J., D. MCMILLIAN ve J.O.S. WILSON (2006), "Do firm sizes and profit rates converge? evidence on Gibrat's law and the persistence of profits in the long run", Applied Economics, c.38. pp.267 - 278.
  • GREINER, L.E. (1972), "Evolution and revolution as organizations grow," Harward Business Review, c.50. pp.37 - 46.
  • GUJARATI, D. N. (2004), Basic Econometrics (Fourth Edition), USA: McGraw Hill Inc.
  • HALL, B. H. (1987), "The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector," The Journal of Industrial Economics, c.35. S.4. pp.583-606.
  • HART, P.E. (2000), "Theories of firms' growth and the generation of jobs," Review of Industrial Organization, c. 17. pp. 229-248.
  • HECKMAN, J. J. (1979), "Sample selection bias as a spesifica-tion error," Econometrica, c.47. S.1. pp. 153- 162.
  • HSIAO, C. (2002), Analysis of Panel Data (Second Edition), UK: Cambridge University Pres.
  • HYMER, S. ve P. PASHIGAN (1962), "Firm size and rate of growth," The Journal of Political Economy, c.70. S.6. pp.556 - 569.
  • İSKENDEROĞLU, Ömer, Hatice DOĞUKANLI, Mehmet ÖZMEN, (2008), "Gibrat Yasasının Türkiye İmalat Sanayi İşletmelerinin Büyümeleri İçin Geçerliliğinin Sınanması", Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 45 (525), s.73 - 83.
  • JOVANOVIC, B. (1982). "Selection and the evolution of industry," Econometrica, c.50. S.3. pp.649-70.
  • KEANE, M. P. ve RUNKLE, D. E. (1992) "On the Estimation of Panel-Data Models with Serial Correlation When Instruments Are Not Strictly Exogenous", Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 10(1), pp. 1-9, January.
  • KILIÇKAPLAN, Serdar, Feride Hayırsever BAŞTÜRK; (2007), "Gibrat Yasası ve Firmalarda Büyüme", 8. Türkiye Ekonometri ve İstatistik Kongresi 24 - 25 Mayıs 2007, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
  • KOLB, B. A. (1983), Principles of Financial Management (First Edition), USA: Texas Business Publication.
  • KUMAR, M.S. (1985), "Growth acquisitions activity and firm size : evidence from the United Kingdom," The Journal of Industrial Economics, c.33. S.3. pp.327-338.
  • MANSFIELD, E. (1962), "Entry, gibrafs law, innovation, and the growth of firms," The American Economic Review, c.52. S.5. pp.1023-1051.
  • MONTE, A. D.ve E. PAPAGNI (2003), "R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms," Research Policy, c.32. pp. 1003- 1014.
  • OLIVIERA, B. ve A. FORTUNATO (2004), "Determinants of firm growth: a comparative study between a panel of Portuguese manufacturing and service firms," Conference Paper of 31 th. European Association for Research in Industrial Economics.
  • PAPPAS J.L. ve E.F. BRIGHAM (1979), Managerial Economics (Third Edition), Illinois: Dryden Prepp.
  • PENROSE, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: John Wiley.
  • PENROSE, E. T. (1995) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (3rd edition), Oxford: Oxford University Prepp.
  • PETRUNIA, R. (2008), "Does Gibrat's law hold? evidence from. Canadian retail and manufacturing firms," Small Business Economics, c.30. pp.201 - 214.
  • PIERGIOVANNI, R., E. SANTARELU, L KLOMP ve A.R. THURIK (2002), "Gibrafs law and the firms size firm growth relationship in Italian services," Tibergen Institute Discussion Paper: 2002-080/3.
  • REICHSTIEN, T. ve M. B. JENSEN (2005), "Firm size and firm growth rate distributions - the case of Denmark," Industrial and Corporate Change, c.14. S.6. pp.1145- 1166.
  • STEINMETZ, L. L (1969), "Critical stages of small business growth", Business Horizons, vol: 12, pp.29-36.
  • WAGNER, J. (1992), "Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance : testing Gibrat's law with establishment data from lower saxony, 1978 - 1989," Small Business Economics, c.4. pp.125-131.
  • WEISS, C. R. (1998), "Size growth and survival in the upper Austrian farm sector," Small Business Economics, c. 10. pp.305 -312.
  • WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Sectional and Panel Data, Cambridge: MIT Prepp.
  • YASUDA, T. (2005), "Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese manufacturing," Small Business Economics, c.24. pp.1-15.