Avrupa komşuluk politikası'nın ekonomik etkileri açısından değerlendirilmesi

Avrupa Birliğinin beşinci genişleme dalgasından sonra güvenlik, istikrar, refah ve komşu ülkelerle ilişkilerin geliştirilmesi sağlanması önemli politikalardan biri haline gelmiştir. Çünkü bu ülkelerin ekonomik durumları arasındaki farklılıklar ve organize suçlarla mücadele Avrupa Birliği ile komşu ülkeler arasında yeni politikalar oluşturulmasına yol açmıştır. 2004 yılında başlatılan Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası 16 ülkeyi kapsamaktadır. Bu ülkeler: İsrail, Ürdün, Moldova, Fas, Filistin, Tunus, Ukrayna, Ermenistan, Azerbaycan, Mısır, Gürcistan, Lübnan, Cezayir, Suriye, Libya ve Beyaz Rusyadır. Avrupa Komşuluk Politikasının asıl amacı Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ile komşuları arasındaki ilişkileri düzenlemektedir. Bu çalışmada, Avrupa Komşuluk Politikasının ekonomik etkileri 2005 ile 2012 yılları arası esas alınarak incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası kapsamındaki ülkelerin ekonomik durumları ve hayat standartlarında bu dönemde bir iyileşme olduğunu göstermektedir.

Evaluation of european neighborhood policy s economic effects

After the fifth enlargement of the European Union, it became one of the important policies to provide security, stability, prosperity, and develop relationship between neighborhood countries. The differences at the economic situation and struggling with organized crime between European Union and neighbor countries lead to be created new policies. European Neighborhood Policy was launched in 2004, and consists of 16 countries. These countries are: Israel, Jordan, Moldova, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Tunisia, Ukraine, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Georgia, Lebanon, Algeria, Syria, Libya and Belarus. The main aim of the European Neighborhood Policy is to arrange the relationship between the European Union countries with their neighbors. This study examines the economic effects of the European Neighborhood Policy on relevant countries in terms of Human Development Index, export and import growth rates between 2005 and 2012. The results show that economic situation and life standards of relevant countries have been improved in this period.

PDF

___

ALIBONI, Roberto; (2005), The Geopolitical Implications of the European Neighbourhood Policy, European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(1), pp.1-16.
BARBE, Esther and Elisabeth JOHANSSON-NOGUES; (2008), The EU as a modest force for good: the European Neighbourhood Policy, International Affairs, 84(1), pp.81-96.
BAUER, Patricia; (2011), The Transition of Egypt in 2011: A New Springtime for the European Neighbourhood Policy?, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 12(4), pp.420- 439.
BOT, BERNARD; (2004), Great Game or European Fair Play? The European Union and the World in the 21th Century, http:// www.sant.ox.ac.uk/esc/docs/Bernard_Bot.pdf. 05.03.2013.
BROWNING, Christopher S. and George CHRISTOU; ( 2010), The constitutive power of outsiders: The European Neighbourhood Policy and The Eastern Dimension, Political Geography,29, pp. 109-118.
CASAS-CORTES, Maribel, COBARRUBIAS, Sebastian and John PICKLES; (2012), Re-bordering The Neighbourhood: Europe's Emerging Geographies of Non-accession Integration, European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(1), pp. 37-58.
COMELLI, Michele; (2004), The Challenges of the European Neighbourhood Policy, The International Spectator, 39(3), pp. 97-110.
COTTRELL, ROBERT; Survey: Meet the Neighbour, http:// www.economist.com/node/4100576. 06.03.2013.
FREYBURG, Tina, LAVENEX, Sandra, SCHIMMELKENNIG, Frank, SKRIPKA, Tatiana and Anne WETZEL; (2011), Democracy Promotion through Functional Cooperation? The case of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Democratization, 18(4), pp. 1026-1054.
GAWRICH , Andrea, MELNYKOVSKA, Inna and Rainer SCHWEICKERT; (2010), Neighbourhood Europeanization through ENP: The Case of Ukraine, Journal of Common Market Studdies, 48 (5), pp. 1209-1235.
GEZER, Cansu; (2010), Avrupa Birliği Komşuluk Politikası, İzmir Ticaret Odası Yayını.
EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe Progress Report 2007-2010. http://www.kpmg.com/RO/en/IssuesAndInsights/ ArticlesPublications/Press-releases/Documents/EU%20 Funds%20in%20CEE%202011_KPMG.pdf. 30.01.2014
KELLEY, Judith; (2006), New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New European Neighbourhood Policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (1), pp. 29-55.
MAGEN, Amichai; (2006), The shadow of enlargement: can the European Neighbourhood Policy achieve compliance? , Columbia Journal of European Law, 12, pp.383-427.
HÜLLEN, Vera Van; (2012), Europeanisation through Cooperation? EU Democracy Promotion in Morocco and Tunisia, West European Politics, 1 (35), pp.117-134.
PARDO, Sharon; (2004), Europe of Many Circles: European Neighbourhood Policy, Geopolitics, 9(3), pp. 731-737.
PRIMATAROVA, Antoniette; (2005), In Search of Two Distinct Tracks for Non-EU Europe and the European Neighbourhood, Nicolas HAYEZ, Leszek JESIEN and Wim van MEURS (Ed.), Enlarged EU-Enlarged Neighbourhood: Perspectives of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, pp. 19-47.
SEEBERG, Peter; (2009), The EU as a Realist Actor in Normative Clothes: EU Democracy Promotion in Lebanon and the European Neighbourhood Policy, Democratization, 16 (1), pp. 81-99.
SENYUCEL, Sabiha, GÜNER, Sanem, FAATH, Sigrid ve MATTERS, Hanspeter; (2006), Factors and Perceptions Influencing the Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Selected Southern Mediterranean Partner Countries, http://www.euromesco.net/euromesco/images/49_eng.pdf. 05.03.2013.
SMITH, Karen, E. ; (2005), The outsiders: the European neighbourhood policy, International Affairs, 81, pp.757-773.
SÖNMEZ, Sait, A.; (2010), Avrupa Birliğinin Komşu Bölgelere Yönelik Siyasi Açılımı: Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), ss.113-122.