Yeni nesil self-etching adeziv sistemlerin antibakteriyel özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı self-etching adezivsistemlerin antibakteriyel etkilerinin, Streptococcus mutans S. mutans , Lactobacillus acidophilus L. acidophilus ve Lactobacillus casei L. casei bakterileri üzerinde değerlendirilmesidir.Clearfil Protect Bond Primer, Adper EasyBond ve Xeno V self-etching adeziv materyallerininantibakteriyel etkileri, S. mutans, L. casei and L.acidophilus standart suşlarında disk difüzyon yöntemi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. % 2’lik klorheksidin içeren Klorhex pozitif kontrol materyaliolarak kullanılmıştır. Her materyalden 20 µlemdirilmiş steril kağıt diskler n=6 hazırlanmış,37°C de 48 saat inkübasyondan sonra diskler etrafında oluşan inhibisyon zonları milimetre olarakölçülmüştür. Sonuçların istatistiksel değerlendirmeleri ANOVA, Friedman ve Kruskal-Wallis testleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır.Test edilen materyal gruplarının antibakteriyel etkinlikleri arasındaki fark, her bakteri suşuiçin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur p

Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of New Generation Self-Etching Adhesive Systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate theantibacterial effects of different self-etchingprimer/adhesives on Streptococcus mutans S.mutans , Lactobacillus acidophilus L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei L. casei . The antibacterial effects of Clearfil ProtectBond Primer, Adper Easy Bond and Xeno V weretested against standart strains of S. mutans, L. caseiand L. acidophilus using the disk diffusion method.Chlorhex was used as a positive control material,consisting of 2 % chlorhexidine. Standart filterpaper disks n=6 impregnated with 20 µl of eachmaterial were prepared. After incubation at 37°Cfor 48 hours, zones of inhibited bacterial growthwere measured in milimeters. Data were analyzedusing ANOVA, Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallistest. The difference between antibacterial effect ofthe tested material groups were statistically significant for each bacterial strains p

___

  • Gondim JO, Duque C, Hebling J, Giro EMA. Influence of human dentine on the antibacterial activity of self-etching adhesive systems against ca- riogenic bacteria. J Dent 2008; 241-8.
  • Schmalz G, Ergucu Z, Hiller KA. Effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents. J Endod 2004;30:352-8.
  • Yazıcı R, Ozalp M, Baseren M, Dayangac B. İki farklı amalgam bonding primerinin antibakteriyel aktivitelerinin değerlendirilmesi. CÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002; 5:85-7.
  • Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin: diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent 1979; 4: 63-70.
  • Atac AS, Cehreli ZC, Sener B. Antibacterial activity of fifth-generation dentin bonding systems. J Endod 2001;27:730-3.
  • Gao W, Smales RJ, Yip HK. Deminerali- sation and remineralisation of dentine caries, and the role of glass-ionomer cements. Int Dent J 2000; 50:51-6.
  • Meiers JC, Miller GA. Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins. Oper Dent 1996; 21:257-64
  • Atac AS, Cehreli ZC, Sener B. Antibacterial activity of fifthgeneration dentin bonding systems. J Endod 2001;27:730–3.
  • Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S, Peters MC, In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Dent Mater 2006;22: 527-32.
  • Settembrini L, Boylan R, Strassler H, Scherer W. A comparison of antimicrobial activity of etchants used for a total etch technique. Oper Dent 1997;22:84-8.
  • Karacaer O, Dincer C, Mısırlıgıl A, Aydın C. Çeşitli dentin bonding ajanların antimikrobiyel aktivitelerinin araştırılması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1995; 5:24-9
  • Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC, Bonding of restorative resins to dentine: status of dentine adhe- sives and impact on cavity design and filling tech- niques. Int Dent J 1988;38:97-104.
  • Emilson CG, Bergenholtz G. Antibacterial activity of dentinal bonding agents. Quintessence Int 1993;24:511-5.
  • Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Comparative study of dentin adhesives, Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:280-7.
  • Prati C, Nucci C, Montanari G. Shear bond strength and microleakage of dentin bonding sys- tems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:401-7.
  • Feuerstein O, Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of self-etching dental adhesive systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:349- 54; 396-8.
  • Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Torii M, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Incorporation of antibacterial monomer MDPB in dentin primer. J Dent Res 1997;76:768-72.
  • http://www.kurarayturkey.com/scripts/ urun.asp?ID=10&page=default.asp&results= (Erişim tarihi: 10.09.2009)
  • Imazato S, Ehara A, Torii M, Ebisu S. Antibacterial activity of dentine primer containing MDPB after curing. J Dent 1998;26:267-71.
  • Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003;19:449–57.
  • Korkmaz Y, Ozalp M, Attar N. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:57-64.
  • Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990;69:861-4.
  • Loesche WJ, Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 1986;50:353- 80.
  • Emilson CG, Ericson T, Lilja J, Heyden G. Effect of chlorhexidine on human oral streptococci. J Periodontal Res 1972;7:189-91.
  • Ateşağaoğlu Kaya A, Ömürlü H, Sultan N, Sipahioğlu B. Farklı dentin bağlayıcı sistemlerin antimikrobiyal özelliklerinin in vitro değerlen- dirilmesi. GÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2008;25:15-22.
  • Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RRB. Comparison of antibacterial activity of simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 2002;5: 356–60.
  • Imazato S, Kaneko T, Takahashi Y, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. In vivo Antibacterial Effects of Dentin Primer Incorporating MDPB. Oper Dent 2004; 29:369–75.
  • Yıldırım S, Uçan US. Farklı dentin bonding sistemlerin antibakteriyel etkıilerinin karşılaştırılma- sı. GÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2005;22:1-5.
  • Bagis YH, Kosem G, Yamanel K, In vitro evaluation of antibacterial effects of dentin bonding agents on streptococcus mutans, AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2001; 28: 279-85.