Molar kök kanallarında farklı kanal tedavisi yenileme tekniklerinin etkinliği: ex vivo çalışma
Bu çalışmanın amacı iki farklı döner aletin ve el aletlerinin çözücülü ve çözücüsüz kullanılarak gütaperka kök kanal dolgusunun uzaklaştırılmasında etkinliklerinin belirlenmesidir. kanal dolguları uzaklaştırıldıktan sonra radyografiler alınmış, dijital ortama aktarılmış ve görüntüler bir yazılım programında analiz edilmiştir. Kök kanal yüzeyindeki dolgu materyali kalıntılarının oranı değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada tüm test gruplarındaki kök kanallarında gütaperka ve kanal patı kalıntıları mevcuttur. İstatistiksel analiz teknikler arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığını göstermiştir P>0.05 , bununla birlikte kanal dolgusunun boşaltılma süresi açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı farklar P
Efficacy of Different Retreatment Techniques in Molar Root Canals: An ex vivo Study
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two different rotary instruments with and without a solvent versus hand files in the removal of gutta-percha root fillings. Sixty extracted human molar teeth were used for this study. Mesiobuccal canals of teeth were prepared and filled with sealer and guttapercha. Before retreatment was applied, radiographs were taken. Specimens were divided into six groups: Group 1:Protaper Universal Rotary Retreatment System, Group 2: Protaper Universal Rotary Retreatment System with eucalyptol , Group 3: Profile, Group 4: Profile with eucalyptol, Group 5: Hedström files Group 6: Hedström files with eucalyptol. During retreatment procedure, the operating time was recorded. After removing root canal fillings from the canals, radiographs were taken, digitalized and analyzed in a software for image analysis. The ratio of remaining obturation material to root canal surface was derived. In this study gutta-percha and sealer remnants were present within the root canal in all test groups. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the techniques P>0.05 ; however, a significant statistical difference P
___
- 1. Nair PN, Sjogren U, Kahnberg KE,
Krey G, Sundqvist G. Intraradicular bacteria
and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human
teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions
long-term light and electron microscopic
follow-up study. J Endod 1990; 16: 508-88.
- 2. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Persson S,
Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time
of root filling on the outcome of endodontic
treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int
Endod J 1997; 30: 297-306.
- 3. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist
T. Microbiological status of root-filled teeth
with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1998; 31:
1-7.
- 4. Siqueira JF, Jr. Aetiology of root canal
treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can
fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 1-10.
- 5. Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic
retreatment-case selection and technique. Part
2. Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod
1988; 14: 607-14.
- 6. Sandhya UM, Mohan Thomas Nainan,
Mangala TM, Sharad Kamat. To treat and to
retreat “Protaper universal rotary system, the
double delight". Endodontology 2009; 21: 40-
5.
- 7. Wilcox LR, Krell KV, Madison S,
Rittman B. Endodontic retreatment; evaluation
of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal
reinstrumentation. J Endod 1987; 13: 453-7.
- 8. Lewis R, Block R. Management of
endodontic failures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 1988; 66: 7111-21.
- 9. Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A.
Endodontic retreatment-case selection and
technique. Part 3: retreatment techniques. J
Endod 1990; 16: 543-9.
- 10. Hulsmann M, Stotz S. Efficacy,
cleaning ability and safety of different devices
for gutta-percha removal in root canal
retreatment. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 227-33.
- 11. Tasdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Çelik
D. Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in
removing gutta-percha from root canals. Int
Endod J 2008; 41: 191-6.
- 12. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata G-I, Uemura
M, Toda T, Weine F. A comparison of the
relative efficacies of four hand and rotary
instrumentation techniques during endodontics
retreatment. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 361-6.
- 13. Ferreira JJ, Rhodes JS, Pitt Ford TR.
The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using
Profiles. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 267-74.
- 14. Barrieshi-Nussair MK. Gutta-percha
retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium
rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand
files. J Endod 2002; 28: 454-6.
- 15. Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, Huang XY.
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary
retreatment system for gutta-percha
removalfrom root canals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:
288-95.
- 16. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N.
Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness
of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different
materials. J Endod 2008; 34: 1370-3.
- 17.Só MVR, Saran C, Magro ML, VierPelisser FV, Munhoz M. Efficacy of ProTaper
retreatment system in root canals filled with
gutta-percha and two endodontic sealers. J
Endod 2008; 34: 1223-5.
- 18.de Carvalho Maciel AC, Zaccaro
Scelza MF. Efficacy of automated versus hand
instrumentation during root canal retreatment:
an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 779-
84.
- 19. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Banegas G.
Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated
instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an
ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 521-6.
- 20. Kosti E, Lambrianidis T, Economides
N, Neofitou C. Ex vivo study of the efficacy
H-files and rotary NiTi instruments to remove
gutta-percha and four types of sealer. Int
Endod J 2006; 39: 48-54.
- 21. Wilcox LR. Endodontic retreatment:
ultrasonics and chloroform as the final step in
reinstrumentation. J Endod 1989; 15: 125-8.
- 22. Imura N, Zuolo ML, Ferreira MOF,
Novo NF. Effectiveness of the Canal Finder
and hand instrumentation in removal of guttapercha root fillings during root canal
retreatment. Int Endod J 1995; 29: 382-6.
- 23. Frajlich SR, Goldberg F, Massone EJ,
Cantarini C, Artaza LP. Comparative study of
retreatment of Thermafil and lateral
condensation endodontic fillings. Int Endod J
1998; 31: 354 -7.
- 24. Cunha RS, de Martin AS, Barros PP,
Silva FM, Jacinto RC, Bueno CS. In vitro
evaluation of the cleansing working time and
analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or
resilon remnants in the root canal walls after
instrumentation for endodontic retreatment. J
Endod 2007; 33: 1426-8.
- 25. Sae-Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim
BK, Lee HL. Effectiveness of Profile .04 taper
rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. J
Endod 2000; 26: 100-4.
- 26. Bueno CES, Delboni MG, Araújo ra,
carrara hj, cunha rs. Effectiveness of rotary and
hand files in gutta-percha and sealer removal
using chloroform or chlorexidine gel. Braz
Dent J 2006; 17: 139-43.
- 27. Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri
NH. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in
the removal of gutta-percha during root canal
retreatment. J Endod 2007; 33: 38-41.
- 28.Giuliani V, Cocchetti R, Pagavino G.
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal retreatment
files in removing filling materials during root
canal retreatment. J Endod 2008; 34: 1381-4.
- 29. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G.
Effectiveness of manual and mechanical
instrumentation for the retreatment of three
different root canal filling materials. J Endod
2008; 34: 466-9.
- 30. Hunter KR, Doblecki W, Pelleu GB.
Halothane and Eucalyptol as alternative to
chloroform for softening gutta-percha. J Endod
1991; 17: 310-3.
- 31.Wilcox LR. Endodontic retreatment
with halothane versus chloroform solvent. J
Endod 1995; 21: 305-7.
- 32. Oyama KON, Siqueira LE; Santos M.
In vitro study of effect of solvent on root canal
retreatment. Braz Dent J 2002; 13: 208-11.
- 33. Brodin P, Roed A, Aars H, Orstavik
D. Neurotoxic effects of root filling materials
on rat phrenic nerve in vitro. J Dent Res 1982;
61: 1020-3.
- 34. U.S. Food And Drug Administration.
Memorandum to state drug officials.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1974.
- 35. Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the
pulp 3rd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1984: 205-
24, 246-51.
- 36. U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. Public Health Service Fourth
Annual Report on Carcinogens. PB 85-134663,
1985.
- 37. Morse D, Wilcko J. Gutta percha-euca
percha. J Acad Gen Dent 1978; 26: 58-64.
- 38. Low D, Rowal BD, Griffin WJ.
Antibacterial action of essential oils. Planta
Med 1974; 26: 184-9.
- 39. Maruzzella JC, Sicurella NA.
Antibacterial activity of essential oil vapors. J
Am Pharm Assoc 1960; 49: 692-4.
- 40. Friedman S, Moshonov J, Trope M.
Residue of gutta-percha and glass ionomer
cement sealer following root canal retreatment.
Int Endod J 1993; 26: 169-72.
- 41.Zuolo ML, Walton RE. Instrument
deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium
versus stainless steel. Quintessence Int 1997;
28: 397-402.
- 42. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH.
Shaping ability of Profile .04 Taper Series 29
rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated
root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 1-7.
- 43. Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of
two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a
hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely
curved root canals during retreatment: an ex
vivo study. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 532-7.
- 44.Takahashi CM, Cunha RS, Martin AS,
Fontana CE, Silveira CFM, Bueno CES. In
vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of
ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment
System for gutta-percha removal with or
without a solvent. J Endod 2009; 35: 1580-3.
- 45. Pirani C, Pelliccioni GA, Marchionni
S, Montebugnoli L, Piana G, Prati C.
Effectiveness of three different retreatment
techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: A scanning electron
microscope study. J Endod 2009; 35: 1433-40.
- 46. Masiero AV, Barletta FB.
Effectiveness of different techniques for
removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int
Endod J 2005; 38: 2-7.
- 47. Betti LV, Bramante CM. Quantec SC
rotary instruments versus hand files for guttapercha removal in root canal retreatment. Int
Endod J 2001; 34: 514-9.
- 48. Hülsmann M, Bluhm V. Efficacy,
cleaninig ability and safety of different rotary
NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int
Endod J 2004; 37: 468-76.
- 49. Bramante CM, Betti LV. Efficacy of
Quantec rotary instruments for gutta-percha
removal. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 463-7.