Özcan ÖZGEL, Emine KARAKURUM, Yasin DEMİRASLAN

Yeni Zelanda tavşanında (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) midenin farklı doluluk derecelerinin böbreklerin topografisi üzerine etkisi

Özgel Ö, Karakurum E, Demiraslan Y. Yeni Zelanda tavşanında (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) midenin farklı doluluk derecelerinin böbreklerin topografisi üzerine etkisi.Amaç: Tavşanlarda midenin farklı doluluk derecelerinin böbreklerin topografisi üzerine etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Hayvanlar normal beslenenler, midesi boş ve midesi dolu tavşanları elde etmek üzere 8'er adetlik 3 gruba ayrıldı. Doygunlukları aynı olan her üç gruptaki tavşanlardan 6 tanesi (3x2) diseke edildi. Geri kalan tavşanlar sternal pozisyonda uzanmış durumda tespit edilerek -20°C'de donduruldu. Bu üç grup hayvandan üçer adet olmak üzere toplamda tavşanların 9 tanesinden paramedian kesit ve diğer 9 tanesinden ise transversal kesit alındı.Bulgular: Midesi boş tavşanlarda sol böbreğin cranial ucunun I.-II. vertebrae lumbales, caudal ucunun ise III. vertebra lumbalis düzeyinde olduğu, sağ böbreğin cranial ucunun XII. vertebra thoracicae düzeyinde uzandığı, caudal ucunun ise I.-II. vertebrae lumbales düzeyinde bulunduğu belirlendi. Midesi dolu tavşanlarda ise sol böbreğin cranial ucunun III. lumbal vertebra, caudal ucunun ise V. lumbal vertebrae düzeyinde olduğu, sağ böbreğin cranial ucunun I.-II. vertebrae lumbales arasındaki düzeyde uzandığı, caudal ucunun ise III. vertebra lumbalis düzeyinde bulunduğu gözlendi.

Ozgel O, Karakurum E, Demiraslan Y. The effect of the dif

gel O, Karakurum E, Demiraslan Y. The effect of the different strike levels of the stomach on the kidneys in the New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.).Aim: In the present study, it was aimed at the investigation of the effect of varying degrees of stomach fullness on the topography of the kidneys in the rabbit. Materials and Methods: The animals were allocated to 3 groups, each comprising 8 rabbits, such that they were grouped as animals that were subjected to normal feeding and those with an empty and full stomach. From the three groups, which were comprised of animals with the same degree of stomach fullness, 6 rabbits (3x2) were dissected. The remaining animals were placed in sternal recumbency and frozen at -20°C. Paramedian and transversal sections were obtained from three animals in each group, and in total from 9 rabbits.Results: The left kidney at empty stomach in rabbits was determined that the level of cranial tip at I. - II. vertebrae lumbales at and caudal tip III. vertebra lumbalis. The right kidney was determined that extends at the level of cranial tip at XII. vertebra thoracica and caudal tip at I. - II. vertebra lumbales. The left kidney at full stomach in rabbit was determined that the level of cranial tip at III. vertebra lumbales, if the caudal tip V. vertebra lumbalis. The right kidney was determined that the level of cranial tip at I.-II. vertebra lumbales, while caudal tip at III. vertebralumbales.Conclusion: It may be concluded that fullness of the stomach effects on kidneys in the cross-sectional anatomy of the normal abdominal region in the rabbit.

PDF

___

Barone R, Pavaux C, Blin PC, Cuq P, 1973. Atlas D'Anatomie Du Lapin, Masson & C, Paris, France, pp: 71-80, 93-112.
Breiling F, 1994. Vergleichende makroskopischen-fotog- rafische transversale Schnittanatomie der abdominalen Organe von Hundund Katze. Dissertation, Tierarztliche Hochschule, Hannover, Germany, p: 9.
Constantinescu GM, Constantinescu IA, 2004. Clinical Dissec- tion Guide For Large Animals, Horse and Large Ruminants, second edition, Iowa State Press, Blackwell Publishing Company, Iowa, USA, pp: 49-72, 289-312.
Craigie EH, 1969. Bensley's Practical Anatomy of the Rabbit. Eighth Edition, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Cana- da, pp: 93-242.
Deniz E, 1966. Kedide midenin çeşitli doluluk derecesinin karın organlarının topografisi ve şekilleri üzerine etkisi. Doçentlik Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Anatomi Kürsüsü, Ankara, Türkiye, p: 38.
DeRycke LM, Gielen IM, Simoens PJ, VanBree H, 2005. Com- puted tomography and cross-sectional anatomy of the tho- rax in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res, 66, 512-524.
Dursun N, 2002. Veteriner Anatomi - II, Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 41-80.
Dursun N, 2005. Veteriner Topografik Anatomi, Medisan Ya- yınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 88-110.
Eken E, Gezici M, 1999. Kedide midenin farklı doluluk dere- celerinin böbreklerin topografisine olan etkileri. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 15, 51-58.
Evans HE, Delahunda A, 1996. Miller's Guide to the Dissecti- on of the Dog. Fourth Edition, WB Saunders Co, Philadelp- hia, USA, pp: 181-194.
Feeney DA, Fletcher TF, Hardy AM, 1991. Atlas of Correlati- ve Imaging Anatomy of the Normal Dog - Ultrasound and Computed Tomography: WB Saunders Co, London, UK, pp: 13-15.
Fike JR, Druy EM, Zook BC, Davis DO, Thompson JE, Chaney E, Bradley EM, 1980. Canine anatomy as assessed by compu- terized tomography. Am J Vet Res, 41, 1823-1832.
Flecknell PA, 1992. Laboratory Animal Anesthesia. Academic Press Limited, 24-28 Oval Road, London, UK, p: 137.
Fox RR,1984. The rabbit as a research subject. Physiologist, 27, 393-402
Güzel N, Yavru N, 1997. Veteriner Genel Radyoloji, SÜ Vet Fak Yay Ünitesi, Konya Türkiye, pp: 21-58.
Hedrich HJ, Bullock G, 2008. The Laboratory Mouse. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston, USA, pp: 138-152.
Hillen B, 1984. Computerized Tomography, in: Anatomy. 15. Kongress der Euopae ischen Vereinigung der Veterinaer anatomen. 26. bis 30. August, Utrecht, Holland, pp: 26-30.
Klesty C, 1984. Lageund Lageveraenderungen der Bauchöh- lenorgane der Katzebei Verschiedenen Körperstellungen im Hindblickuafdie Klinische Untersuchung, DissJustus- Liebig-Universitat Giessen. Institutfür Veterinar Anatomie, Histund Embry, Germany, pp: 21-71.
Nomina Anatomi Veterinaria, 2005. Prepared by the Inter- national Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical No- menclature (I.C.V.G.A.N.) Published by the Editorial Com- mitee, Hannover, Germany.
Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG, 2007. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review. Eur Cell Mater, 13, 1-10.
Popesko P, Rajtova V, Horak JA, 1992. Colour Atlas of Ana- tomy of Small Laboratory Animals. Volume One: Rabbit & Guinea Pig, Saunders, London, UK, pp: 79-94.
Poyraz Ö,2000. Laboratuvar Hayvanları Bilimi. Kardelen Of- set, Ankara, Türkiye, p: 13.
Rivero MA, Vazquez JM, Gil F, Ramirez JA, Vilar JJM, De Miguel A, Arencibia A, 2009. CT-soft tissue window of the cranial abdomen in clinically normal dogs: An anatomical desc- riptions using macroscopic cross-sections with vascular injection. Anat Histol Embryol, 38, 18-22.
Samii VF, Biler DS, Koblik PD, 1999. Magnetic resonance ima- ging of the normal feline abdomen: An anatomic reference. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 40, 486-490.
Samii VF, Biller DS, Koblik PD, 1998. Normal cross-sectional anatomy of the feline thorax and abdomen: Comparison of computed tomography and cadaver anatomy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 39, 504-511.
Shively MJ, Beaver BG, 1985. Dissection of the Dog and Cat. First Edition, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp: 92-97.
Smodlaka H, Henry RW, Daniels GB, Reed RB, 2004. Correla- tions of computed tomographic images with anatomic fea- tures of the abdomen of ringed seals (Phocahispida). Am J Vet Res, 65, 1240-1244.
Van Caelenberg AI, De Rycke LM, Hermans K, Verhaert L, Van Bree HJ, Gielen IM, 2010. Computed tomography and cross-sectional anatomy of the head in healthy rabbits. Am J Vet Res, 71, 293-303.
Wolfensohn S, Lloyd M, 2003. Handbook of Laboratory Ani- mal Management and Welfare. 3rd edition, Blackwell Pub- lishing, UK, pp: 32.
Zotti, A, Banzato T, Cozzi B, 2009. Cross-sectional anatomy of the rabbit neck and trunk: comparison of computed to- mography and cadaver anatomy. Res Vet Sci, 87, 171-176.