Doğukan ÖZEN, Özlem KAYMAZ, Mustafa Bahadır ÇEVRİMLİ, Tuba BALAK, Feyza GÜNAY, Mustafa Agah TEKİNDAL

Veteriner hekimlik alanında gözlemsel araştırmaların rapor edilmesi: STROBE-VET kriterlerinin Türkçe uyarlaması

Amaç: Bu çalışma, STROBE-VET' in Türkçe versiyonunun veteriner hekimlik alanında gözlemsel çalışmaların raporlamasınıngüçlendirilmesi ve STROBE-VET'in kullanımının araştırmacılartarafından daha anlaşılır bir hale gelmesini sağlamak amacıylayapılmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: STROBE-VET kriterleri 4 araştırmacı (TB, FG,ÖK, MAT) tarafından her biri diğerinden bağımsız olacak şekildeTürkçe’ye tercüme edilmiş ve tüm grubun bir araya gelmesiylebirleştirilmiştir. Ardından uzman çevirmen tarafından ters çeviri işlemi yapılmış ve kriterlerin uygunluğu değerlendirilmiştir.Türkçe kontrol listesinin tekrarlanabilirliğini değerlendirmekve araştırmacılar tarafından doğru anlaşılıp anlaşılmadığını anlamak için, DÖ ve MBÇ tarafından veteriner hekimlik alanında20 çalışma incelenmiştir. Araştırmacılar arasındaki uyum herbir kriter için araştırmacılar arası uyum yüzdesi kullanılarakincelenmiştir. Uyum ayrıca toplam raporlanan kriter sayısı kullanılarak Bland-Altman yöntemi ve sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı(SKK) kullanılarak da değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: İncelenen çalışmalardaki kriterler, raporlama sıklığında büyük bir farklılaşma göstermektedir. SKK değerleri0,351 ile 0,890 değerleri aralığında değişmektedir.Öneri: Türkçe'ye uyarlanmış olan STROBE-VET bildirisinin,dergilerin hakemleri ve editörleri ile veteriner hekimlik alanında çalışan araştırmacılar için bir rehber olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Reporting observational studies in veterinary research: Turkish adaptation of the STROBE-VET criterias

Aim: This study, the Turkish version of the STROBE-VET was made to strengthen the reporting of observational studies in the veterinary field and making the usage of the STROBE-VET better understood by the researchers. Materials and Methods: STROBE-VET criteria have been translated into Turkish by 4 researchers (TB, FG, ES, MAT), each independent from the other. The translation was finalized with the collection of the group. Then, an expert translator was reversed and its compliance with the criteria was evaluated. Secondly, in order to assess the Turkish control list whether it is understood correctly by the researchers, 20 studies in the field of veterinary sciences have been evaluated by two veterinarians (DÖ and MBÇ). The correspondence between the responses of the researchers was examined using the percentage of compliance between researchers for each criterion. In addition, it was assessed using the Bland-Altman Method and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) using the total number of reported criteria. Results: According to results, criteria has a great variation in the frequency of reporting in the studies. ICC values ranged from 0.351 to 0.890. Conclusion: The Turkish version of STROBE-VET will be a guide for the referees and editors of journals as well as researchers studying in the field of veterinary science.

PDF

___

Albayrak R, Tekindal MA, Ateş C, Selvi P, Perçinel S, Ceyhan K, Genç Y, 2012. Tanı Doğruluğu Çalışmalarının Kalitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Stard Kriterlerinin Türkçe Uyarlaması. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 65 (3), 137- 146.
Al-Shahi Salman R, Beller E, Kagan J, Hemminki E, Phillips RS, Savulescu J, Macleod M, Wisely J, Chalmers I, 2014. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet, 383, 176-185.
Ateş C, Öztuna D, Genç Y, 2009. Sağlık Araştırmalarında Sınıf İçi Korelasyon Katsayısının Kullanımı. Türkiye Klinikleri J Biostat, 1, 59-64.
Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, Krumholz HM, Ghersi D, van der Worp HB, 2014. Increasing value and reducing waste: Addressing inaccessible research. Lancet, 383, 257-266.
Cochran WG, 1965. The planning of observational studies of human populations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 128, 134-155.
Fanelli D, 2013. Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature, 494-149.
Field N, Cohen T, Struelens MJ, Palm D, Cookson B, Glynn JR, Gallo V, Ramsay M, Sonnenberg P, Maccannell D, Charlett A, Egger M, Green J, Vineis P, Abubakar I, 2014. Strengthening the reporting of molecular epidemiology for infectious diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement. Lancet Infect. Dis. 14, 341-352.
Gallo V, Egger M, McCormack V, Farmer PB, Ioannidis JP, Kirsch-Volders M, Matullo G, Phillips DH, Schoket B, Stromberg U, Vermeulen R, Wild C, Porta M, Vineis P, 2012. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology − molecular epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 42, 1–16.
Groenwold RH, Van Deursen AM, Hoes AW, Hak E, 2008. Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review Ann. Epidemiol., 18, 746-751.
Haynes AB, Berry WR, Gawande AA, 2015. What do we know about the safe surgery checklist now? Ann Surg, 261, 829– 830.
Sargeant JM, O’Connor AM, Dohoo IR, Erb HN, Cevallos M, Egger M, Ersbøll AK, Martin SW, Nielsen LR, Pearl DL, Pfeiffer DU, Sanchez J, Torrence ME, Vigre H, Waldner C, Ward MP, 2016. Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reportingof observational studies in epidemiology − veterinary (STROBE-Vet)statement. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 134, 188–196.
Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN,1989. Statistical Evaluation of Agreement Between Two Methods for Measuring a Quantitative Variable. Comput. Biol. Med. 19, 61-70.
Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Gagnon F, von Elm E, Khoury MJ, Cohen B, Davey-Smith G, Grimshaw J, Scheet P, Gwinn M, Williamson RE, Zou GY, Hutchings K, Johnson CY, Tait V, Wiens M, Golding J, van Duijn C, McLaughlin J, Paterson A, Wells G, Fortier I, Freedman M, Zecevic M, King R, Infante-Rivard C, Stewart A, Birkett N, 2009. Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 24, 37–55.
McGraw KO, Wong SP, 1996. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1(1), 30-46.
Moher D, Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Nasser M, Bossuyt PM, Korevaar DA, Graham ID, Ravaud P, Boutron, 2016. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: Who’s listening? Lancet, 387, 1573-1586.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, 2001. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 357, 1191–1194.
O’Connor AM, Sargeant JM, Gardner IA, Dickson JS, Torrence ME, Dewey CE, Dohoo IR, Evans RB, Gray JT, Greiner M, Keefe G, Lefebvre SL, Morley PS, Ramirez A, Sischo W, Smith DR, Snedeker K, Sofos J, Ward MP, Wills R, 2010. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. J. Vet. Intern. Med., 24, 57-64.
O’Connor AM, Sargeant JM, Dohoo IR, Erb HN, Cevallos M, Egger M, Ersboll AK, Martin SW, Nielsen LR, Pearl DL, Pfeiffer DU, Sanchez J, Torrence ME, Vigre H, Waldner C, Ward MP, 2016a. Explanation and elaboration document for the STROBE-Vet statement: strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology −veterinary extension. J. Vet. Intern. Med. (in press).
O’Connor AM, Sargeant JM, Dohoo IR, Erb HN, Cevallos M, Egger M, Ersboll AK, Martin SW, Nielsen LR, Pearl DL, Pfeiffer DU, Sanchez J, Torrence ME, Vigre H, Waldner C, Ward MP, 2016b. Explanation and elaboration document for the STROBE-Vet statement: strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology−veterinary extension. Zoon Public Health (in press).
Papathanasiou AA, Zintzaras E, 2010. Assessing the quality of reporting of observational studies in cancer. Ann. Epidemiol., 20, 67-73.
Sargeant JM, O’Connor AM, Renter DG, Kelton DF, Snedeker K, Wisener LV, Leonard EK, Guthrie AD, Faires M, 2011. Reporting of methodological features in observational studies of pre-harvest food safety. Prev. Vet. Med., 98, 88-98. Sargeant JM, O’Connor AM, 2014. Issues of reporting in observational studies in veterinary medicine. Prev. Vet. Med., 113, 323-330.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group, 2010. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol., 63(8), 834-840.
Smidt N, Rutjes AW, Van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Reproducibility of the STARD Checklist: An Instrument to Assess the Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, 2005. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 235,(2), 347-353.
Tooth L, Ware R, Bain C, Purdie DM, Dobson A, 2005. Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research. Am. J. Epidemiol., 161, 280-288.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, 2007. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology, 18(6), 805-835.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, 2014. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg., 12(12), 1500-1524.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S, 2007. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335, 806-808.