Fatma İNAL, Abdurrahman PİRİNÇ, Oğuz KAHRAMAN, Zekeriya Safa İNANÇ, Mehmet Ali KUCUR

Farklı sürelerde pişirilen dengeli toz mamanın köpeklerde tercih, sindirilebilirlik ve dışkı kalitesi üzerine etkileri

Amaç: Sunulan çalışmada farklı pişirme süreleri ile hazırlanan dengeli toz mamanın köpeklerde tercih oranı, sindirilebilirliği ve dışkı kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması hedeflenmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 16 adet yetişkin (3-4 yaş) Golden Retriever köpek kullanıldı. Sindirilebilirlik denemelerinde 10 adet köpek canlı ağırlık ortalamaları yakın olacak şekilde iki gruba ayrıldı. Toz mama suyla karıştırılıp 15dk ve 30dk pişirilerek günlük olarak hazırlandı. İlk gruba (n=5) 15dk, diğerine (n=5) 30dk pişirilen mamalar verildi. Asitte erimeyen kül metodu ile sindirilebilirlik tayini 9 gün sürdürüldü (5 gün alıştırma, 4 gün dışkı toplama). Dışkı toplama işleminden önce 4 farklı araştırmacı tarafından dışkı skorlama yapıldı. Her bir köpeğe ait dışkılardan numune alınarak kuru madde içerikleri belirlendi. Mamalara iki-kap tercih testi yapıldı. Bu test 12 gün sürdürüldü ve 16 köpek kullanıldı. 15dk ve 30dk pişirilerek hazırlanan mamalar aynı anda verilerek tercih oranları belirlendi. Bulgular: 15dk ve 30dk pişirilen toz mamaları tüketen grupların kuru madde sindirilebilirlikleri sırasıyla; %74,12 ve %77,96, organik madde sindirilebilirlikleri ise sırasıyla; %79,23 ve %83,49 olarak belirlendi (p>0.05). 15dk pişirilen mama %51, 30dk pişirilen mama %49 oranında tercih edildi(p>0.05). 15dk pişirilen mamayı tüketen köpek grubunun dışkı skoru ve dışkı kuru maddesi sırasıyla; 3,97 ve %36,52; 30dk pişirilen mamayı tüketen grupta ise 4,07 ve %38,84 olarak belirlendi (p>0.05). Öneri: Köpeklerde sindirilebilirlik parametrelerine önemli bir etkisi olan pişirme süresinin 15dk olarak yapılması, bu çalışmada kullanılan mama için yeterli olmaktadır. Hazırlanmış toz formdaki mamanın yüksek sindirilebilirliğe sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Doğal köpek besleme konusuyla ilgili olarak farklı tip mama ve diyetler hazırlanarak yeni çalışmaların yapılması gerekmektedir.

Effects of balanced powder food cooked for different cooking times on preference, digestibility and stool quality in dogs

Aim: This study was aimed to investigate the effects of balanced powdered food prepared at different cooking times on preference rate, digestibility and stool quality in dogs. Materials and Methods: Sixteen adult Golden Retriever dogs (3-4 years old) were used. In digestibility trials, 10 dogs were divided into two groups according to their live weights. Food mixed with water and cooked daily. The first group (n=5) was given food cooked for 15min, the other (n=5) for 30min. Determination of digestibility by acid insoluble ash method was carried out for 9 days (5d acclimatization, 4d stool collection). Stool scoring was performed by 4 different researchers before collection. Dry matter contents were determined by taking samples from the feces of dogs. Twopan preference test was also performed. This test was carried out for 12 days and 16 dogs were used. Preference rates were determined by giving 15min and 30min cooked foods at the same time. Results: Dry matter digestibility of the groups consuming powder foods cooked for 15min and 30min were 74.12% and 77.96% respectively. Organic matter digestibilities were 79.23% and 83.49% respectively (p> 0.05). Food cooked for 15min was preferred 51%, and 30min was preferred as 49% (p> 0.05). The stool consistency score and stool dry matter of the dog group that consumed the food cooked for 15min were 3.97 and 36.52% respectively; In the group that consumed the food cooked for 30min were 4.07 and 38.84% respectively (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Cooking time has a significant effect on digestibility parameters in dogs, cooking for 15min is sufficient for the food used in this study. It has been determined that the prepared powdered formula has high digestibility. New studies need to be made by preparing different types of food and diets on the subject of natural dog feeding

PDF

___

AAFCO, 2015. Official publication. Association of American Feed Control Officials, Atlanta, GA.
Altan A, McCarthy KL, Maskan M, 2009. Effect of extrusion cooking on functional properties and in vitro starch digestibility of barley‐based extrudates from fruit and vegetable by‐products. J Food Scı, 74(2), E77-E86.
Alvarenga IC, Aldrich CG, Ou Z, 2019. Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs. J Anım Sci, 97(3), 1036-1041.
AOAC, 2003. Official Methods of the AOAC, Ed: Gaithersburg MD, 7th ed. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Beynen AC, 2020. Baked dog food. Erişim adresi: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/340271675_Beynen_ AC_2020_Baked_dog_foodErişim Tarihi: 3 Kasım 2020.
Berschneider HM, 2002. Alternative diets. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract, 17, 1–5.
Carciofi AC, Pontieri R, Ferreira CF, Prada F, 2006. Avaliação de dietas com diferentes fontes protéicas para cães adultos. Rev Bras Zootecn, 35(3), 754-760.
Case LP, Carey DP, Hirakawa DA 1998. In: Nutrição canina e felina: manual para profissionais, Ed: Harcourt Brace de España, 424.
Cipollini I, 2008. Pet food: Quality and quality improvement, A Thesis, Feed and Food Science, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna.
Dunsford B, Plattner B, Greenbury D, Rokey G, 2002. The influence of extrusion processing on petfood palatability. In Proceedings of Pet Food Forum. Chicago, Illinois. Watt Publishing, Inc. Mt. Morris, Illinois, USA, 327-342.
Dust JM, Grieshop CM, Parsons CM, Karr-Lilienthal LK, et al., 2005. Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability, and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs. J Anim Sci, 83, 2414-2422.
Erdogan M, Tepeli C, Ozbeyaz C, Akbulut MD, et al., 2012. Comparison of some morphological characteristics of native Turkish dog breeds. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 28, 106-110.
Fediaf, 2017. Nutritional guidelines for complete and complementary pet food for cats and dogs. Erişim Adresi: https://fediaf.org/self-regulation/nutrition.html. Erişim tarihi: 6 Kasım 2020.
Felix AP, SáFortes CML, Silva ACM, Nascimento ST, et al., 2009.
Digestibility of a home-made diet and two dog foods, standard and super-premium, for dogs. Archives of Veterinary Science, 14(1), 25-30.
Forster GM, Hill D, Gregory G, Weishaar KM, et al., 2012. Effects of cooked navy bean powder on apparent total tract nutrient digestibility and safety in healthy adult dogs. J Anim Sci, 90, 2631-2638.
Gröner T, Pfeffer E, 1997. Digestibility of organic matter and digestible energy in single ingredients of extruded dog feeds and their effects on faecal dry matter concentration and consistency. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 77, 214–220.
Heinze CR, Gomez FC, Freeman LM, 2012. Assessment of commercial diets and home-prepared diets recommended for dogs with cancer. J Am Vet Med Assoc 241, 1453–1460.
İnal F, Alataş MS, Kahraman O, Inal Ş, et al., 2017. Barley as an alternative to rice in dog food. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 41(6), 770-774.
İnal F, Alataş MS, Kahraman O, Inal Ş, et al., 2018. Using of pelleted and extruded foods in dog feeding. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 24, 131-136.
İnal F, Alataş MS, Kahraman O, Özbilgin A, Gürbüz E, 2018.
Köpek Beslemede Yal Denemeleri. 2. Uluslararası Hayvan Besleme Kongresi, 1-4 Kasım. Antalya/Türkiye.
Johnson ML, Parsons CM, Fahey GC, Merchen NR, Aldrich CG, 1998. Effects of species raw material source, ash content, and processing temperature on amino acid digestibility of animal by-product meals by cecectomized roosters and ileally cannulated dogs. J Anim Sci, 76(4), 1112-1122.
Kara K, Guclu B., Baytok E, 2019. Comparison of fermentative digestion levels of processed different starch sources by Labrador Retrievers at different ages. Vet Med-Czech, 64, 158-171.
Kara K, 2020. Determination of the in vitro digestibility and nutrient content of commercial premium extruded foods with different types of protein content for adult dogs. Vet Med-Czech, 65(6), 233-249.
Koppel K, Gibson M, Alavi S, Aldrich G, 2014. The effects of cooking process and meat inclusion on pet food flavor and texture characteristics. Animals, 4(2), 254-271.
Lankhorst C, Tran QD, Havenaar R, Hendriks WH, et al., 2007. The effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of canine diets as assessed by in vitro indicators. Anim Feed Sci Tech, 138(3-4), 285-297.
Larsen JA, Parks EM, Heinze CR, et al., 2012. Evaluation of recipes for home-prepared diets for dogs and cats with chronic kidney disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 240, 532–538.
Lobo MF, Rezende, ASC, Saliba EOS, Sampaio IBM, 2001. Determination of apparent digestibility coefficients either by markers or total fecal collection techniques in dogs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec, 53(6), 691-694.
Murray SM, Fahey GC, Merchen NR, Sunvold GD, Reinhart GA, 1999. Evaluation of selected high-starch flours as ingredients in canine diets. J Anim Sci, 77, 2180-6.
NRC, 2006. Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press. Parr JM, Remillard RL, 2014. Handling alternative dietary requests from pet owners. Vet Clin Small Anim, 44, 667–688.
Pedrinelli V, Gomes OS, Carciofi AC, 2017. Analysis of recipes of home-prepared diets for dogs and cats published in Portuguese. J of Nutr Scı, 6, 33, 1-5.
Remillard RL, Crane SW. 2000. Making pet foods at home. S Anim Cli Nutri, 207-23.
Remillard RL, 2008. Homemade diets: attributes, pitfalls, and a call for action. Top Companion Anim Med, 23, 137-142.
Streiff EL, Zwischenberger B, Butterwick R, 2002. A comparison of the nutritional adequacy of home-prepared and commercial diets for dogs. J Nutr, 132, 1698-1700.
Sá-Fortes CML, 2005. Valor nutricional de ingredientes energéticos e protéicos para cães. Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Strickling JA, Harmon DL, Dawson KA, Gross KL, 2000. Evaluation of oligosaccharide addition to dog diets: influences on nutrient digestion and microbial populations. Anım Feed Scı Tech, 86(3-4), 205-219.
Schünemann C, Mühlum A, Junker S, Wilfarth H, et al., 1989.
Praecaecale und postileale Verdaulichkeit verschiedener Stärken sowie pH-Werte und Gehalte an organischen Säuren in Darmchymus und Faeces. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 19, 44–48.
Tran QD, Hendriks WH, Poel AF, 2008. Effects of extrusion processing on nutrients in dry pet food. J Sci Food Agric, 88(9), 1487-1493.
Twomey LN, Pluske JR, Rowe JB, Choct M, et al., 2003. The replacement value of sorghum and maize with or without supplemental enzymes for rice in extruded dog foods. Anım Feed Scı Tech, 108(1-4), 61-69.
Watson T, 2011. Breaking it down measuring food quality and digestibility. Vet Times, 41(8), 22-24.
Weeth LP, 2013. Focus on nutrition: Home-prepared diets for dogs and cats. Compend Contin Educ Vet, 35(3), E3 Zanatta CP, Gabeloni LR, Félix AP, Brito CBMD, et al., 2013.
Methodology for determination of digestibility of diets containing vegetable or animal protein sources in dogs. Ciênc Rural, 43, 696-701.