The Effect of Augmented Reality Applications in the Learning Process: A Meta- Analysis Study

The Effect of Augmented Reality Applications in the Learning Process: A Meta- Analysis Study

Purpose: The aim of this research is to investigate theeffect of Augmented Reality (AR) applications in thelearning process. Problem: Research that determines the effectiveness of Augmented Reality (AR) applications in the learning process with different variables has not been encountered in national or international literature. Research Methods: To determine the effect of AR in the learning process, experimental studies conducted in 2007-2017 on theuse of AR in education were analyzed by the MetaAnalysis Method. Analyzed articles were selected among the publications in the journalsscanned in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). In this context, 16 studies were examinedto identify the effect of AR applications in the learning process. Findings: Findings indicatedthat AR applications increase students’ academic achievement in the learning processcompared to traditional methods. Implications for Research and Practice: It was concludedthat AR applications do not show significant differences in academic success in the learningprocess. For example, the “grade level” variable of the study does not show a significantdifference compared to traditional methods. When assessing AR display devices, the largesteffect size was related to the use of mobile devices, while the smallest effect size was in the useof webcam-based devices. When comparing sample size in the study, it was identified that theeffect size of large sample groups was affected by AR on a medium level, while small sampleswere affected minimally.

___

  • Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence (Cambridge, Mass.), 6(4), 355–385.
  • Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.
  • Batdı, D. (2014). Etkinlik temelli öğrenme yaklaşımının akademik başarıya etkisi (Metaanalitik ve tematik bir çalışma) [The Effect of Activity-Based Learning Approach on Academic Achievement (A Meta-Analytic and Thematic Study)]. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 39-55. DOI: 10.19160/e- ijer.12976.
  • Batdı, V. (2015). Kavram haritası tekniği ile geleneksel öğrenme yönteminin kullanılmasının öğrencilerin başarıları, bilgilerinin kalıcılığı ve tutumlarına etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [The Effect of Using the Concept-Mapping Technique and Traditional Methods on the Achievement, Retention and Attitudes of Students: A Meta-Analytic Study]. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 42(2), 93-102.
  • Batdı, V. (2017). Eğitlence Uygulamalarının Akademik Başarıya Etkisi: Meta-Analitik Bir Çalışma [The Effect of Edutainment Applications upon Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Study]. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 47–62.
  • Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The magicbook-moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. IEEE Computer Graphics and applications, 21(3), 6- 8.
  • Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research. A guide for literature reviews (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 2). London: Sage Publications.
  • Chang, H. Y., Hsu, Y. S., & Wu, H. K. (2016). A comparison study of augmented reality versus interactive simulation technology to support student learning of a socio- scientific issue. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1148-1161.
  • Chang, R. C., Chung, L. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245-1264.
  • Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652.
  • Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Employing Augmented-Reality-Embedded Instruction to Disperse the Imparities of Individual Differences in Earth Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835-847
  • Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
  • Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta-analiz. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
  • Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
  • Ergene, T. (2003). Effective interventions on test anxiety reduction: A meta- analysis. School Psychology International, 24(3), 313-328.
  • Gavish, N., Gutierrez, T., Webel, S., Rodriguez, J., Peveri, M., Bockholt, U., & Tecchia, F. (2015). Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 778-798.
  • Gözüyesil, E., ve Dikici, A. (2014). Beyin temelli öğrenmenin akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [The Effect of Brain Based Learning on Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytical Study]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 1-2. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.2103.
  • Günay, R., Kaya, Y. ve Aydın, H. (2014). Çok kültürlü Eğitim Yaklaşımının Etkililik Düzeyi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması [The Effectiveness Level of Multicultural Education: A Meta-Analysis Study]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(4): 145-166.
  • Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., & So, H. J. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 455-474.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Hsiao, H. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. Y., & Wang, Y. Z. (2016). Weather observers: a manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 205-223.
  • Huang, T. C., Chen, C. C., & Chou, Y. W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72-82.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research synthesis.
  • Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895-1906.
  • Ibanez, M. B., Di Serio, A., Villaran, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
  • Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545-556.
  • Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339-345.
  • Ke, F., & Hsu, Y. C. (2015). Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 33-41.
  • Lin, H. C. K., Chen, M. C., & Chang, C. K. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799-810.
  • Lin, T. J., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314-321.
  • Liou, W. K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Beyond the Flipped Classroom: A Highly Interactive Cloud-Classroom (HIC) Embedded into Basic Materials Science Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460-473.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American psychologist, 48(12), 1181.
  • Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context‐aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
  • Ozdemir, M. (2017a). Educational Augmented Reality (AR) Applications and Development Process. In Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality in Open Education (pp. 26-53). IGI Global.
  • Ozdemir, M. (2017b). Artırılmış Gerçeklik Teknolojisi ile Öğrenmeye Yönelik Deneysel Çalışmalar: Sistematik Bir İnceleme [Experimental Studies on Learning with Augmented Reality Technology: A Systematic Review]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 609-632.
  • Pasareti, O., Hajdin, H., Matusaka, T., Jambori, A., Molnar, I., & Tucsanyi-Szabo, M. (2011). Augmented Reality in education. INFODIDACT 2011 Informatika Szakmódszertani Konferencia.
  • Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 7(1), 38-56.
  • Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59-68.
  • Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114-122.
  • Sahin, M. C. (2005). İnternet tabanlı uzaktan eğitimin etkililiği: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [The effectiveness of Internet-based distance education: A meta-analysis study]. Unpublished master's thesis, Çukurova University, Social Sciences Institute, Adana, Turkey
  • Tarım, K. (2003). Kubaşık öğrenme yönteminin matematik öğretimindeki etkinliği ve kubaşık öğrenme yöntemine ilişkin bir meta analiz çalışması [Effectiveness of cooperative learning method on teaching mathematics and meta analytic study for cooperative learning method]. Unpublished master's thesis. Çukurova University Institute of Science and Technology, Adana, Turkey.
  • Tekedere, H., & Göker, H. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.
  • Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research, 1-9.
  • Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585.
  • Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
  • Yang, M. T., & Liao, W. C. (2014). Computer-assisted culture learning in an online augmented reality environment based on free-hand gesture interaction. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(2), 107-117.
  • Yılmaz, Z. A., & Batdı, V. (2016). Artırılmış Gerçeklik Uygulamalarının Eğitimle Bütünleştirilmesinin Meta-Analitik ve Tematik Karşılaştırmalı Analizi [A Meta-Analytic and Thematic Comparative Analysis of the Integration of Augmented Reality Applications into Education]. Education and Science, 41(188), 273-289.
  • Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519-541.
  • Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.
  • Zhou, F., Duh, H. B. L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (pp. 193- 202). IEEE Computer Society.