Analysis of EFL Teachers’ Use of Digital Components: Evidence from Self-Report and Classroom Observation

Purpose: A coursebook is ranked among thefundamentals of language teaching, which directlyaffects the success of classroom activities. Therefore, investigations into the nature and efficiency of this relationship should yield invaluable insights to improving language teaching. In this regard, this study aims to investigate EFL teachers’ views regarding the necessity of such software, its actual use in teaching, and its perceived advantages. Methods: In this study, a mixed research design wasused, in which qualitative and quantitative researchmethods were used together.For these purposes, three different data collection tools were employed throughout this study:a) a survey, b) classroom observations, and c) post-observation interviews. First, a total of 74participants were surveyed, and then 14 of them were observed while teaching and wereinterviewed afterwards. Findings: Coursebook software was most commonly utilized withinlistening tasks and least commonly utilized in writing tasks. Active use time was observed tobe 143 minutes, which is 20% of the total teaching time. The passive use time of the tool wascalculated to be 511 minutes (73.5%), and the digital tool was turned off for a duration of 46minutes (6.5%). Semi-structured interviews revealed three main themes: attractivepresentation of the content, effective teaching, and classroom management. Implications forResearch and Practice: It is crucial to equip EFL teachers with the skills needed to employ thedigital components of coursebooks effectively. The availability of classrooms equipped withICT tools—including a computer with internet connection, a projector, and speakers for audio,as well as in-service training on the effective use of ICT tools at the host institution—promotepositive attitudes towards ICT among the teachers; therefore, these facilities should be madeavailable to EFL teachers.

PDF

___

Allen, C. (2015). Marriages of convenience? Teachers and coursebooks in the digital age. ELT Journal, 69(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv005
Andrews, R. (2000). Learning, literacy and ICT: What’s the connection? English in Education, 34(3), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2000.tb00580.x
Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report a review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe.
Bax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4 System, 31(1), 13–28.
Cinkara, E. (2016). An ethnographic investigation of activity modifications in EFL classrooms. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.01.010
Clyde, & A., L. (2004). Electronic whiteboards. Teacher Librarian, 32(1), 43–44.
Cox, M., Cox, K., & Preston, C. (2000). What motivates teachers to use ICT? In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Education-line.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2012). ICT in ELT: how did we get here and where are we going? ELT Journal, 66(4), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs050
Elaziz, M. (2008). Attitudes of students and teachers towards the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.thesis.bilkent.edu.tr/0003608.pdf
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Chajut, E. (2009). Changes over time in digital literacy. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(6), 713–715. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0264
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2–3, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A “learning revolution”? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511099
Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200115
Gunduz, N. (2005). Computer assisted language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.24391
Hismanoglu, M. (2011). The integration of information and communication technology into current ELT coursebooks: A critical analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.048
Idrees, I. A. (2010). Information & communication technologies in ELT. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.211-214
Jose, J., Jafre, M., & Abidin, Z. (2015). Application of information and communication technology tools for English language teaching in an Omani context. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (22), 51–67. Retrieved from www.awej.org
Kelley, P., Underwood, G., Potter, F., Hunter, J., & Beveridge, S. (2007). Viewpoints. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511164
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511073
Korkmaz, G., & Basaran, S. D. (2016). İngilizce ogretiminde oxford itools ve itutor yazilimlari kullaniminin hazirlik sinifi ogrencilerinin akademik basarisina etkisi [Using oxford itools and itutor software in English language teaching and its effect on preparatory class students’ academic achievement]. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(11), 55–70.
Mahadii, M. A., & Shahrill, M. (2014). In pursuit of teachers’ views on the use of textbooks in their classroom practice. International Journal of Education, 6(2), 149.
Mâţă, L., Lazăr, I., & Lazăr, G. (2015). A literature review of studies based on investigating attitudes towards interactive boards. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and Didactics, 19(1), 91–100.
Mitsikopoulou, B. (2014). Materials design for the digital enrichment of the Greek EFL textbooks. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 48–69.
Mitsikopoulou, B. (2016). Digital enrichment of EFL textbooks. In Psaltou-Joycey A., Agathopoulou E. & Mattheoudakis M. (Eds.), Cross-curricular Approaches to Language Education (404-430). London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mozejko, Z. P., & Krajka, J. (2011). A Framework for evaluating digital coursebooks. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(1), 167-173.
O’Hagan, C. (1999). Embedding ubiquitous use of educational technology: Is it possible, do we want it and, if so, how do we achieve it? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2(4), 19–22.
O’neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104 ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111.
Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), 1-13.
Richards, J. (1993). Beyond the text book: The role of commercial materials in language teaching. RELC Journal, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829302400101
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
Rollins, K. B. (2011). Classroom observations of instructional practices and technology use by elementary school teachers and students in an ethnically-and economically-diverse school district. Texas A&M University.
Rovai, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.10.002
Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237– 246. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
Toscu, S. (2013). The impact of interactive whiteboards on classroom interaction in tertiary level English as a foreign langauge classes. Unpublished thesis.
Turel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers’ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Educational Technology and Society, 15(1), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00508.x
Tzortzidou, S., & Hassapis, G. (2001). Assessment of the reading skill improvement in the computer-assisted teaching of a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies, 6(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012558107689
Warschauer, M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to networkbased language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. G. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice (pp. 171–185). London: Cambridge University Press.
Wen-Cheng, W., Chien-Hung, L., & Chung-Chieh, L. (2011). Thinking of the textbook in the ESL/EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p91
Yilmaz, Y. Y. (2015). Learning vocabulary in a foreign language : A computer software based model attempt. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 11(2), 23–38.