The Assessment of Non-academic and Academic Service Quality in Higher Education

The Assessment of Non-academic and Academic Service Quality in Higher Education

Problem Statement: Higher education is the fastest growing service industry on the globe which needs appropriate methods and strategies to meet the current students' needs, keep them happy, and attract more recruitments. Recent research emphasizes how to improve service quality for student satisfaction, however, there is still no consensus on how best to measure and manage quality Within higher education institutions. Pupose of the Study: The aim of this study is to assess the perceived service quality of students and to determine the student satisfaction level in higher education. lt attempts to diagnose the applicability of two different, nonacademic (SERVQUAL) and academic (SEEQ), service quality frameworks to students of higher education. In the present study, the assessment of non-academic service quality is defined as ’the services provided by administrative units such as registrar, library, faculty/ school offices, rector office, dormitories, sports and health centre etc.’ and the assessment of academic service quality is defined as ’the services provided by instructors including courses and content' in university setting. Methods: The current study is based on three measures: service quality (non-academic services), instructional quality (academic services), and student satisfaction. The sample of the study consists of 330 students studying at private university in North Cyprus. Descriptive analysis such as means, standard deviation, and frequencies were calculated. Reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and regression analysis were performed. Findings and Results: The nature of service quality measurement instruments in this study is found to be uni-dimensional for both academic and non-academic services in higher education. Tangibles and empathy dimensions of non-academic service quality are found to be the significant predictor of student satisfaction, whereas, instructors' enthusiasm, course organization, breadth of coverage, group interaction, individual rapport, and assignments dimensions of academic service quality are found to be the significant predictor of student satisfaction. The remaining dimensions of non-academic and academic service quality found to be insignificant in predicting student satisfaction and needs priority to better influence students. Conclusions and Recomendations: Service quality and student satisfaction are important factors in student retention; it is important that universities measure service quality and use the tools of continuous improvement. ldentifying student perceptions of service quality in higher education allows management to better tailor marketing efforts to ensure that student needs are met. It is recommended by this study that higher education authorities should maintain their level of service delivery to keep the students satisfied.

___

  • Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V. Day, G. S. (1995). Marketing research. New York: John Wiley.
  • Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared. International Journal of Research Method in Education, 29(1), 71—89.
  • Angur, M. G., Nataraajan, R. ]ahera, J. S. (1999). Service quality in the banking industry: An assessment in developing economy. The Journal of Services Marketing, 13(2), 132-150.
  • Avdjieva, M. Wilson, M. (2002). Exploring the development of quality in higher education. Managing Service Quality, 12(6), 372-383.
  • Babakus, E. Mangold, G. W. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: An empirical investigation. Health Services Research, 26(6), 767—86.
  • Babukus, E. Boller, G. W. (1992). An empirical assessment of SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268.
  • Bone, P. F. (1995). Word of mouth effects on short—term and long-term product judgments. Journal of Business Research, 32(3), 213-223.
  • Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R. Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 7-27.
  • Brightman, H. J., Elliot, M. Bhada, Y. (1993). lncreasing the effectiveness of student evaluation of instructor data through factor score comparative report. Decision Science, 24(1), 192-199.
  • Cameron, K. S. Tschirhart, M. (1992). Postindustrial environments and organizational effectiveness in colleges universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(1), 87-108.
  • Cannon, J. P. Sheth, J. N. (1994). Developing curriculum to enhance teaching of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 16(2), 3—14.
  • Carman, J. M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66(1), 33-5.
  • Cheng, Y. C. (1990). Conception of school effectiveness and models of school evaluation: dynamic perspective. Education Journal, 18(1), 47—62.
  • Churchill, A. G. (1979). paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
  • Churchill, A. G., Ford, N. M., Hartley, S. W., Walker, O. C. (1985). The determinants of salesperson performance: meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 103-118.
  • Coate, L. E. (1990). Implementing total quality management in university setting: TQM at Oregon State University. Journal for Quality and Participation, 13(6), 90- 95.
  • Cronin, J. J. Tayler, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
  • Cronin, J. ]. Tayler, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-rninus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125-131.
  • Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 415-441.
  • Ekinci, Y., Prokopaki, P. Cobanoglu, C. (2003). Service quality in Cretan accommodations: Marketing strategies for the UK holiday market. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(1), 47-66.
  • Ford, ]. B., Joseph, M. ]oseph, B. (1993). Service quality in higher education: comparison of universities in the United States and New Zealand using SERVQUAL. Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing: Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Annual Summer Educators' Conference (75- 81). Boston: American Marketing Association.
  • Greenwald, A. Gillmore, G. (1997). Grading leniency is removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1207-1217.
  • Hair, ]. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. Grablowsky, B.J. (1979). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Petroleum Publishing Company. Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P. Page, M. (2007), Research methods of business. West Sussex: John Wiley Sons.
  • Hampton, G. (1993). Gap analysis of college student satisfaction as measure of professional service quality. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 9(1), 115— 127.
  • Harvey, L. (2003). Editorial: Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), 3-20.
  • Hennig—Thurau, T., Langer, M. F. Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331-44.
  • Karatepe 0. M. Avci, T. (2002). Measuring service quality in the hotel industry: Evidence from northern Cyprus. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 13(1), 19-32.
  • Kotler, P. Fox, K. F. A. (1985). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kotler, P. (1967). Marketing management: Analysis, planning and control. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Li, R. Y. Kaye, M. (1998). case study for comparing two service quality measurement approaches in the context of teaching in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 4(2), 103—113.
  • Likert, R., Roslow, S. Murphy, G. A. (1934). simple and reliable method of scoring the turnstone attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 228-238.
  • Marsh, H. W. Dunkin, M. ]. (1992). Students' evaluation of university teaching: multidimensional perspective. In ]. Smart (Eds). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon Press.
  • Marsh, H. W. Roche, L. (1997). Making students evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187-1197.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: reliable, valid and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 77-95.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research. Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388.
  • Mazzarol, T. (1998). Critical success factors for international education marketing. International Journal of Education Management, 12(4), 163-175.
  • McGorry, S. Y. (2000). Measurement in cross-cultural environment: Survey translation issues. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 74- 81.
  • McKeachie, W. ]. (1979). Student ratings of faculty: reprise. Academe, 65(6), 384-397. Nadiri, H. Hussain, K. (2005). Perceptions of service quality in North Cyprus hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17(6), 469- 480.
  • Norusis, M. J. (1985). Advance statistics guide: SPSS X. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Nunnally, ]. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. O'Neil, M. A. Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39-52.
  • Oldfield, B. M. Baron, S. (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(2), 85-95.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.
  • Parasuraman, A. (1986). Customer-orientated organizational culture: key to successful services marketing. ln M. Venkatesan, D. M. Schmalensee, C.
  • Marshall (Eds). Creativity in services marketing: What’s new, what works, what’s developing (73-7). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L. Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420—450.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V. A. 8: Berry L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. 8: Berry, L. L. (1985). conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41- 50.
  • Patterson, P. G. Johnson, L. W. (1993). Disconfirmation of expectations and the gap model of service quality: An integrated paradigm. journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 6(1), 90-9.
  • Rowley, ]. (1996). Measuring quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 2(3), 237-55.
  • Ruby, C. A. (1998). Assessing satisfaction with selected student services using SERVQUAL, market-driven model of service quality. NASPA Journal, 35(4), 331-341.
  • Seymour, D. T. (1992). On Q: Causing quality in higher education. New York: Macmillan Press.
  • Soutar, G. 8: McNeil, M. (1996). Measuring service quality in tertiary institution. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(1), 77-82.
  • Teas, K. R. (1994). Expectations as comparison standard in measuring service quality: An assessment of reassessment. journal of Marketing, 58(1), 132-9.
  • Thomas, D. R. E. (1978). Strategy is different in service businesses. Harvard Business Review, 56(4), 158-165.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college (2nd Eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Tony, C., Stephen, M. David, Y. (1994). Strategic planning in higher education: Who are the customer. The International journal of Educational Management, 8(6), 29-36.
  • Watkins, D. (1994). Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness: cross-cultural perspective. Research in Higher Education, 35(2), 251-266.
  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. 8: Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1),1-12.