From Self-Esteem to Mental Health: Empathy as Mediator

From Self-Esteem to Mental Health: Empathy as Mediator

Problem Statement: Although self-esteem has been considered an endstate of mental health or defense mechanism, recent theoretical and empirical findings questions its status in the field of psychology. As result of such framework, research mainly concentrated on mean differences in self-esteem and the consequences of these differences for mental health. However, some theoretical considerations imply that selfesteem should be considered dynamic human striving, which contributes to mental health through its effects on other variables related to the construction and maintainance of social relationships such as empathic tendency. Thus, it is requisite to understand the mediatory factors connecting self-esteem and mental health. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to understand whether the relation between self-esteem and mental health is mediated by empathic tendency. In other words, structural model with direct paths from self-esteem to empathic tendency and paths from empathic tendency to life-satisfaction, happiness, and psychopathology were specified. Method: structural model was tested using structural equation modeling. Before the structural model, measurement model was tested. measurement model is structured using the item-parceling method. Different goodness of fit statistics were used to assess models such as the Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Findings and Results: The results showed that both the measurement model and structural model fitted the data reasonably. Mediation tests indicated that the relation between self-esteem and well-being (life satisfaction and happiness) is partially mediated by empathic tendency, while the relation between self-esteem and ill-being is fully mediated. Conclusions and Recommendations: The idea that self-esteem is good in itself and an end state that should be satisfied for mental health should be re-evaluated. Empathic tendency is one important mediatory variable in understanding the effect of self-esteem on mental health. Its effects on mental health through other social or individual dynamics should be evaluated in future research.

___

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
  • Anderson, ]. C. Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling1n practice: review and recommended two--step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Campjbell, ]. D. Krueger,]. l., &Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high selfesteem cause etter performance, inter ersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Scienceın Public Interest, 4, 1-44.
  • Bond, M. H. Sabourin, M. (2000.)Social ps chology and culture: Pathways to life satisfaction. International Journal of Psfl, ology, 35, 297-299.
  • Bowlby,]. (1973). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2. Separation). New York: Basic Books Bowlby, ]. (1988). secure base: Parent— child attachment anal healthy human development London: Basic Books.
  • Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criteria (AIC). Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
  • Burack, J. A., Flanagan, T., Peled, T., Sutton, H. M., Manly, ]. T. (2006). Social perspective-taking skills in maltreated children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 42, 207-217.
  • Chatterton, L., Hall, P. L., Tarrier, N. (2007). Co 'tive therapy for low self-esteem in the treatment of depression in an ol er adult. Behavioral and cognitive psychotherapy, 35(3), 365-369.
  • Covell, C. N., Scalora, M. ]. (2002). Empathic deficits in sexual offenders: An integration of affective, social, and cognitive constructs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 251-270.
  • Crocker, ]., Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392-414.
  • Crocker, ]., Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108(3), 593-623.
  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
  • Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The brief symptom inventory (BSI), administration, scoring and procedures: Manual II: Clinical Psychometric Research.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. ]., Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, L. E., Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
  • Dökmen, U. (1988?. Empatinin yeni bir modele dayanılarak ölçülmesi ve psikodrama ile geliştiri mesi. Egitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1—2), 155—190.
  • Duan, C., Hill, C. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. ]ournal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 261-274.
  • Durak, M., Gençöz, T., Senol-Durak, E. (2008). The reliabiliğ and validity of the satisfaction with life scale in the samples of Turkish elderly an correctional ofliciers. Paper presented at the IV. European Conference on Positive Psychology, Rijeka-Opatija, Crotia.
  • Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (The positive and negative affect scale: Validity and reliability study). Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46), 19-26.
  • Gladstein, G. A. (1983). Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, develo mental, and social psychology perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psycho ogy, 30, 467-482.
  • Griffin-Shirle N., Nes, S. L. (2005). Self-esteem and empathy in sighted and visual impaired preadolescents. Journal of Visual Impairment Blindness, 99, 277-285.
  • Hakansson, ]., Montgomery, H. (2003). Empathy as an interpersonal phenomenon. Jounal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(3), 267-284.
  • ]öresko K. G., Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the IMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Laible, D. ]., Carlo, G., Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 703-716.
  • Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Gillath, O., Nitzberg, R. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and altruism: Boosting attachment security increases compassion and elping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 817-839.
  • Miller, P. A., Eisenberg, N, Fabes, R. A, Shell, R. (1996). Relations of moral reasoning and vicarious emotion to young children's prosocial behavior toward peers and adults. Developmental Psychology, 32, 210-219.
  • Park, L. E., Crocker, ]., Mickelson, K. D. (2004). Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1243-1254.
  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, ]., Solomon, S., Arndt, ]., Schimel, ]. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 435-468.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1965). Client— centered therapy: Its current practice implications and theory. Boston, MA. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N]: Princeton University Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2004). Avoiding death or engaging life as accounts of meaning and culture: Comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004). Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 473-477.
  • Sahin, N. H., Durak, A. (1994). Kısa semptom envanteri: Türk ençleri için uyarlanması (Brief Symptom Inventory: Adaptation for the Tur ish youth). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 44-56.
  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, ]. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg selfesteem scale in 53 nations. Exploring the universal and culture--specific features of global self-esteem. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623-642.
  • Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading. Review of literature and implications or future research. Neuroscience and Biohehavioral Reviews, 30, 855-863.
  • Smith, S. M., Petty, R. E. (19951). Personality moderators of mood congruency effects on cognition: The ro of self-esteem and negative mood regulation journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1092-1107.
  • Srivastava, S., Beer, ]. S. (2005). How self-evaluations relate to being liked by others: Integrating sociometer and attachment perspectives. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 966-977.
  • Steiger, ]. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
  • Stotland, E., Dunn, R. E. (1963). Empathy, self-esteem, and birth order. journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 532-540.
  • Strupp, H. H., Binder, ]. L. (1984). Psychotherapy in new key. New York: Basic Books.
  • Tennen, H., Herzberger, S. (1987). Depression, self-esteem, and the absence of selfprotective attributional biases. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 72—80.
  • Thompson,B (.2.000) Ten commandments of structural equation modeling ln L. G. Grim P. R. Yarnold (Eds.,) Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261--283). Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.
  • Tugrul, C. (1994). Alkoliklerin çocuklarınm aile ortammdaki stres kaynakları, etkileri ve stresle basa çıkma yolları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9, 57-73.
  • Vignemont, F., 8: Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sc1ences, 10, 435-441.
  • Watson, D. Clark, L. A. &Tellegen, A. (1988))oDevel ment and validation ofabrief measure of positive and negative affect: PANAS scales. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.