Matematik Yaratıcılık Ölçeği Geliştirmeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma

Although there is a rapidly increasing interest in creativity in specific domains such as science and math, there are not enough valid and reliable scales to assess students' creativity in these domains. If mathematical creativity potential can be measured, then the curriculum can be adapted to address the needs of creative students. In addition to measuring mathematical creativity potential, it is crucial to identify students at as early an age as possible and develop a mathematics curriculum that would complement and supplement their potential (Balka, 1974; Mann, 2005). For these reasons, valid and reliable scales of measurement are necessary for determining the middle school students' (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade: 10-15 years old) mathematical creativity. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable Mathematical Creativity Scale for middle school students (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade: 10-15 years old). Method: The main aim of the study is to develop a valid and reliable scale of math creativity for use with middle school students. The pilot study's sample consists of 50 middle school students who attend 5th, 6th, 7th and 8thgrades. The field study's sample consists of 297 students who attend 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades at 4 middle schools in Istanbul. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to evaluate the factor structure of the scale. Item analyses were conducted to check on item discrimination, internal consistency, and agreement between scorers, construct-related validity, and face validity. Findings: Item analysis including the calculation of item discrimination, item total and item remainder values showed that each item was consistent with the entire scale and that distinctive powers of the items were at an acceptable level. To test internal consistency, Cronbach's Alpha coefficient value was found to be .80, which supports scale reliability. Since it has a naturally subjective scoring process, the scale was rated by two scorers, and the same scorer re-rated it at a different time. The correlation showed that the scale has an interrater reliability and intrarater reliability. Test-retest coefficient values showed that the scale measurements are consistent. Content, construct and face validity results are presented as a part of validation works of the scale. Acceptability to students' results are also presented. Results: The study results showed that this scale was an appropriate instrument to evaluate middle school (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade) students' mathematical creativity. This scale can be used for measurement of the students' creativity in mathematics for the purpose of educational interventions and also for the purpose of determining gifted and talented students in mathematics

A Study on the Development of a Mathematics Creativity Scale

Although there is a rapidly increasing interest in creativity in specific domains such as science and math, there are not enough valid and reliable scales to assess students' creativity in these domains. If mathematical creativity potential can be measured, then the curriculum can be adapted to address the needs of creative students. In addition to measuring mathematical creativity potential, it is crucial to identify students at as early an age as possible and develop a mathematics curriculum that would complement and supplement their potential (Balka, 1974; Mann, 2005). For these reasons, valid and reliable scales of measurement are necessary for determining the middle school students' (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade: 10-15 years old) mathematical creativity. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable Mathematical Creativity Scale for middle school students (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade: 10-15 years old). Method: The main aim of the study is to develop a valid and reliable scale of math creativity for use with middle school students. The pilot study's sample consists of 50 middle school students who attend 5th, 6th, 7th and 8thgrades. The field study's sample consists of 297 students who attend 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades at 4 middle schools in Istanbul. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to evaluate the factor structure of the scale. Item analyses were conducted to check on item discrimination, internal consistency, and agreement between scorers, construct-related validity, and face validity. Findings: Item analysis including the calculation of item discrimination, item total and item remainder values showed that each item was consistent with the entire scale and that distinctive powers of the items were at an acceptable level. To test internal consistency, Cronbach's Alpha coefficient value was found to be .80, which supports scale reliability. Since it has a naturally subjective scoring process, the scale was rated by two scorers, and the same scorer re-rated it at a different time. The correlation showed that the scale has an interrater reliability and intrarater reliability. Test-retest coefficient values showed that the scale measurements are consistent. Content, construct and face validity results are presented as a part of validation works of the scale. Acceptability to students' results are also presented. Results: The study results showed that this scale was an appropriate instrument to evaluate middle school (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade) students' mathematical creativity. This scale can be used for measurement of the students' creativity in mathematics for the purpose of educational interventions and also for the purpose of determining gifted and talented students in mathematics

___

  • Balka, D. S. (1974). The development of an instrument to measure creative ability in mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(01), 98. (UMI No. AAT 7515965).
  • Baykal, A. (2009). Yaratıcılık: Eğilimi ve Eğitimi[ Creativity: its tendency and education]. Öğrenme ve Öğrenme Bozuklukları. Ataköy: İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73-79.
  • Carlton, V. L. (1959). An analysis of the educational concepts of fourteen outstanding mathematicians, 1790-1940, in the areas of mental growth and development, creative thinking, and symbolism and meaning, Dissertation Abstracts, 20(06), 2131. (UMI No. AAT 5904782).
  • Erbas, A. K. & Bas, S. (2015). The contribution of personality traits, motivation, academic risk-taking and metacognition to the creative ability in mathematics, Creativity Research Journal, 27:4, 299-307, DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2015.1087235
  • Evans, E. W. (1964). Measuring the ability of students to respond in creative mathematical situations at the late elementary and early junior high school level. Dissertation Abstracts, 25 (12), 7107. (UMI No. AAT 6505302)
  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological bulletin, 53(4), 267.
  • Haylock, D. W. (1984). Aspects of mathematical creativity in children aged 11-12. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Chelsea College, University of London.
  • Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Education Studies in Mathematics, 18(1), 59-74.
  • Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464.
  • Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for middle school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (4): 389-403 DOI:10.1080/09500690110098912
  • Jensen, L. R. (1973). The relationships among mathematical creativity, numerical aptitude and mathematical achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34 (5), 2168.
  • Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability's unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831-1836.
  • Kim, H., Cho, S., Ahn, D. (2003). Development of mathematical creative problem solving ability test for identification of gifted in math. Gifted Education International, 18, 184-193.
  • Kline, P. (1993). The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.
  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lee, K. S., Hwang, D., & Seo, J. J. (2003). A development of the test for mathematical creative problem solving ability. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 7, 163-189.
  • Mainville, W.E. (1972) A study of the effects of mathematics activity material upon certain aspects of creative thinking ability of prospective elementary school teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
  • Mann, E. L. (2005). Mathematical Creativity and School Mathematics: Indicators of Mathematical Creativity in Middle School Students. PhD thesis. University of Connecticut.
  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, D.C: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
  • Meissner, H. (2005). Creativity and Mathematics Education. Proceeding of The Third East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education. Shanghai, Nanjing, Hangzhou. Retrieved, 11 Dec. 2012, from http://math.ecnu.edu.cn/earcome3/SYM1.htm
  • Olkun, S. & Akkurt Z. (2012). Matematiksel Problemlerin çözümünde yaratıcı eylem örnekleri [Creative action examples in mathematical problem solving]. Retrieved, 21 March 2012, from www.ustunveozel.com/matyar.ppt
  • Singh, B. (1987). The development of tests to measure methematical creativity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 18(2) 181-186.
  • Singh, B. (1988). Teaching-learning strategies and mathematical creativity. Delhi, India: Mittal Publications.
  • Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J.C. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Applied intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Pres.
  • Treffinger, D.J. (2004). Creativity and Giftedness.Essential Readings in Gifted Education. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Türkan, Y. (2010). Matematiksel Üretkenlik Testi (MÜT)'nin İlköğretim 6., 7. ve 8. Sınıflar düzeyinde psikometrik özelliklerinin İncelenmesi[A research study on psychometric properties of the creative mathematical ability test (c-mat)]. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Eskişehir, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.