Cross-Cultural Experiences through Erasmus: Pre-Service Teachers' Individual and Professional Development

Cross-Cultural Experiences through Erasmus: Pre-Service Teachers’ Individual and Professional Development

Problem Statement: In today's global society, international student mobility is becoming more important in terms of its outcomes such as increasing student participation and involvement in international education and reshaping teacher education in many countries. It also might lead to strong collaboration between countries and may allow universities in Turkey to gain broader international perspective in their educational practices and policies. Since the student population around the world has been rapidly becoming diverse in terms of culture, religion, and race, teacher education programs need to educate teachers in way that they will be aware of cultural differences, be open-minded, be respectful to other cultures, and be willing to make instructional decisions to increase tolerance in their classrooms. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to understand pre-service teachers who came to Turkey through the Erasmus program for cultural experiences in the college of education at West End University (pseudonyms) in Turkey. This study will also analyse how these experiences influenced the individual and professional development of these teachers. Methods: Phenomenological approach was employed as the main research approach in order to describe and interpret the experiences and perceptions of the pre-service teachers. The study was conducted with eight (two males and six females) students. The purposeful sampling methods were used to select participants for this study. The researchers conducted three individual interviews with each participant. In order to analyze the data collected from multiple interviews, the constant comparative method was employed. Findings and Results: Analysis of the data for this study suggested that cross-cultural experiences of pre-service teachers helped them to improve their professional skills and contributed to their individual development. Findings of the study also indicated that diverse field experiences assisted the participants to understand the importance of infusing multicultural approach in their classrooms. During their experience in the university, they also became aware of various instructional methods and different teacher-student relationships. Pre-service teachers also stated that this experience helped them to improve their knowledge of different cultures, increase their self-confidence, change their world view, and become more open-minded individuals. Conclusions and Recommendations: The experiences that the participants encountered during their cross-cultural schooling and daily life in Turkey influenced their development of professional skills and their individual development as teachers of the future in global society. The study has implications for teacher education programs, policies, and pre-service teachers.

___

  • Boeije, H. (2002). purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality Quantity, 36, 391-409.
  • Causey, V. E., Thomas C. D., Armento, B. ]. (2000). Cultural diversity is basically foreign term to me: The challenges of diversity for preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 33-45.
  • Carano, K. T. (2008). Becoming globally literate: Teaching cross-cultural awareness through the use of social networking sites. EABR&TLC Conferences Proceedings.
  • Cruz, B. C., Patterson, ]. M. (2005). Cross-cultural simulations in teacher education: Developing empathy and understanding. Multicultural Perspectives, 7, 40—47.
  • Dooly, M. Villanueva, M. (2006) Internationalisation: key dimension to teacher education. European journal of Teacher Education, 29, 223-240.
  • European Commission. (2001). Eduaction and training 2010 diverse systems, shared goal.
  • Available from http: ec.europa.eu/ education/ policies 2010/ et2010en.html Gay, G., Kirkland, K. N. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and selfreflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42, 181-187.
  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. ]., Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-443.
  • Hanvey, R. G. (1976). An Attainable Global Perspective. New York: The American Forum for Global Education.
  • Kelo, M., Teichler, U., Wachter, B. (2006). Toward improved data on student mobility in Europe: Findings and concepts of the eurodata study. ]ournal of Studies in International Education, 10, 194-223.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Lee, T. M. L. (2005). Intercultural teaching in higher education. Intercultural Education, 16, 201—215.
  • Mahon, j., Cushner, K. (2002). The overseas student teaching experience: Creating optimal culture learning. Multicultural Perspectives, 4, 3—8.
  • Malewski, E. Phillion, ]. (2009). International field experiences: The impact of class, gender and race on the perceptions and experiences of preservice teachers. Teaching anal Teacher Education, 25, 52-60.
  • Marshall, C., Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
  • McMillan, ]. H. (2004). Educational research fundamentals for the consumer. (Fourth Edition). Boston: Pearson.
  • Papatsiba, V. (2006). Making higher education more European through student mobility? Revisiting EU initiatives in the context of the Bologna Process. Comparative Education, 42, 93-111.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Robertson, j. M.. Webber, C. F. (2000). Cross-cultural leadership development. International journal of Leadership in Education, 3, 315-330.
  • Şahin, M. (2008). Cross-cultural experience in preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1777-1790.
  • Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Sleeter, C. E. (1995). White preservice teachers and multicultural education coursework. In ]. M. Larkin, C. E. Sleeter, Developing multicultural teacher education curricula (pp.17-29). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • SPO. (2000). Long-term strategy and eight five year development plan 2001 2005. Ankara: T.R. Prime Ministry State Planning Organization Publications. Available from http: ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ plan/ plan8.pdf
  • Stronkhorst, R. (2005). Learning outcomes of international mobility at two Dutch institutions of higher education. ]ournal of Studies in International Education, 9, 292-315.
  • Teichler, U. (2005). Research on higher education in Europe. European journal of Education, 40, 447-459.
  • Ünver, S. (2007). Intercultural preparatory training for Turkish Erasmus exchange students. Hacettepe University journal of Education, 33, 219-228.
  • Turkish National Agency. (2008). 2004/05, 2005 06, 2006/2007 akademik ylllarmda Erasmus programından faydalanan öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı sayıları.
  • [Numbers of incoming and outgoing students and faculty between 2004 and 2007] Available from http:/ /ua.gov.tr/ uploads erasmus Willard-Holt, C. (2001). The impact of short-term international experience for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 505—517.