A Survey of Turkish Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Attitudes Toward the Environment

Problem Statement: Increasing global population and unrestrained consumption of natural resources has resulted in increasing pollution, poor air and water quality and the extinction of animal and plant species. Today, environmental problems are experienced worldwide and threatening the continuity of human life. For the sake of human beings, environmental problems need to be solved in the near future. Solving environmental problems is only possible with citizens who are knowledgeable about environmental issues, aware of environmental problems, and motivated to work to solve these problems. Environmental education is the most effective way to educate children about these issues. Teachers are the key actors who shape children’s interest in and attitudes toward environmental issues. Thus, for environmental education researchers, it is always worth studying in-service and pre-service teachers’ environmental attitudes. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to investigate Turkish pre-service science teachers’ attitudes toward the environment. In addition, it aims to investigate how pre-service science teachers’ environmental attitudes change with grade level and gender. Method: A total of 2015 pre-service teachers enrolled at elementary school science education departments at 13 different universities in Turkey participated in the study. A 45-item Likert-type questionnaire consisting of four dimensions, namely, awareness of environmental problems, general attitudes toward solutions, awareness of individual responsibility, and awareness of national environmental problems, was used to measure pre-service teachers’ environmental attitudes. Descriptive statistics; frequency distributions and percentages, and inferential statistics; independent samples t-test and analysis of variance, were used to determine pre-service teachers’ environmental attitudes. Findings and Results: The results of the study showed that pre-service science teachers have a high level of environmental attitudes (M = 149.67, SD = 12.10). The results also revealed that there is a statistically significant mean difference (t (2006) = 2.861, p = .004) between males and females in favour of females with a small effect size (η2= .004). The results also showed that there are no significant differences (F (3, 2011) = 2.466, p = .061) between pre-service teachers enrolling to different grades with respect to their environmental attitudes. Conclusions and Recommendations: Overall, the results of the study indicated that today’s pre-service science teachers have positive attitudes toward the environment. Additionally, it was found that females have more positive attitudes toward the environment than males. The gender difference in favour of females may be due to the cultural roles of males and females. In traditional views of gender roles, females are responsible for looking after their children and males are usually responsible for providing the economic wellbeing of the family. As a result of these gender roles, males become more competitive and females become more protective, and thus may show more positive attitudes toward the environment. Based on these results, it is suggested that environmental education provided through all steps of formal education take gender differences into account

PDF

___

Arcury, T. A. (1990). Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human Organization, 49(4), 300-304.
Bord, R.J. & O’Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 830-840.
Borg, W.R., Gall, J. P. & Gall, M.D. (1993). Applying Educational Research: A Practival Guide. 3rd edition. Longman.
Bögeholz, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: Recent German empirical contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 65-84.
Caro, T. M. , Pelkey, N., & Grigione, M. (1994) Effects of conservation biology education on attitudes toward nature. Conservation Biology, 8, 846-852.
Davidson, D. & Freudenburg, W. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302-339.
Derksen, L. & Gartrell, J. (1993). The social context of recycling. AmSociological Rev, 58, 434-442.
Eagles, P.F.J.& Demare, R. (1999). Factor’s influencing children’s environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4).
Engel, U. & Potschke, M. (1998). Willingness to pay for the environment: Social structure, value orientations and environmental behaviour in a multilevel perspective. Innovation:European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 315-332.
Ewert, A., Place, G. & Sibthorp, J. (2005). Early-life outdoor experiences and an individual’s environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27(3), 225-239.
Gardos, V. & Dodd, D. (1995). An immediate response to environmentally disturbing news and the environmental attitudes of college students. Psychological Reports, 77. 1121-1122.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, US.
Goldman, D., Yavetz, B. & Pe’er, S. (2006). Environmental literacy in teacher training in Israel: Environmental behavior of new students. Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 3-22.
Gore, A. (1992). Earth in balance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hes-Quinbita, G. & Pavel, M. (1996). Assessing an environmental attitude development model: Factors influencing the environmental attitudes of college students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394438.
Hodgkinson, S. P. & Innes, J. M. (2001). The attitudinal influence of career orientation in 1st-year university students: Environmental attitudes as a function of degree choice. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(3), 37.
Hughes, M. & Saunders, A. M. (2005). Interpretation, activity participation, and environmental attitudes of visitors to penguin island, Western Austalia. Society & Natural Resources, 18(7), 611-624.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Sci Politics, 28, 57-72.
Kellert, S. R. & Berry, J. K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledge and behaviours towards wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15, 363-371.
Ma, X. & Bateson, D. J. (1999). A multivariate analysis of the relationship between attitude toward science and attitude toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 27-32.
Malkus, A. J. & Musser, L. M. (1997). Environmental concern in school-age children. Elementary and Childhood Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407099.
Musser, L. M. & Diamond, K. E. (1999). The children’s attitudes toward the environment scale for preschool children. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 23-30.
Oerke, B. & Bogner, F. X. (2010), Gender, age and subject matter: Impact on teachers’ ecological values. Environmentalist, 30, 111-122.
Orr, D. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island.
Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and transition to a postmodern world.New York: State University of New York Press.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual.McGraw-Hill Education, Berkshire, England.
Said, A.M., Ahmadun, F., Paim, L.H. & Masud, J. (2003). Environmental concerns, knowledge and practices gap among Malaysian teachers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4, 305-313.
Stapp, W.B. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 1(1), 30-31.
Şama, E. (2003). Ogretmen adaylarının cevre sorunlarina yonelik tutumlari. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 23(2), 99-110.
Taylor, N., Doff, T., Jenkins, K. & Kennelly, J. (2007). Environmental knowledge and attitudes among a cohort of pre-service primary school teachers in Fiji. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(4), 367- 379.
Tikka, P. M., Kuitunen, M. T. & Tynys, S. M. (2000). Effects of educational background on students’ activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 12-20.
Tuncer, G., Ertepınar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2005). Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: Effects of school type and gender. Environmental Education Research, 11(2), 215-223.
UNESCO. (1977). Tbilisi Declaration. Paper presented at the Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education Tbilisi, USSR.
UNESCO. (1975). The Belgrade Charter.(Belgrade, United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization with UNEP).
Wojtewicz, G. G. (1995). Health and environmental protection: A survey of student attitudes. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386447