İbrahim YILDIRIM, Türkan DOĞAN, Jane E. MYERS

Adaptation of the Wellness Evaluation of Lifestyle Scale to Turkish

Problem Statement: Studies show that wellness is closely associated with individual life style. Thus, any efforts toward improving wellness should target aspects of a person's life style. A means of assessing holistic wellness is needed to design programs that increase individuals'/clients' health and wellness and to develop psychological counseling approaches. In other words, a valid and reliable measurement instrument is required. Recent years have witnessed the development of a great number of models of wellness and of a variety of measurement instruments. In Turkey, however, there are few studies on this subject. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study was to adapt the Wellness Evaluation of Lifestyle (WEL) scale to Turkish. The WEL-TJ form of the scale was applied. Methods: The study sample consisted of 425 students (232 female; 193 male) from a university in Ankara, aged between 18 and 29 years x ( examine both the construct validity and factor structure of the WEL. Principle component analysis (PCA) rotation and concurrent validity tests were also performed. The reliability of the WEL was also subject to testretest and internal consistency testing. Findings and Results: Varimax rotation was used to analyze factors and items, and it was observed that, with the exception of items in the "Work" subscale, similar items gathered under the same factor. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from .38 to .84 for the WEL subscales. Total test-retest reliability was .67. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for the overall scale was .92. Conclusions and Recommendations: The findings of this study indicate that the Turkish version of the WEL scale is suitable for measuring wellness levels among university students in Turkey; however, we also recommend that validity and reliability studies be conducted with a larger group of varied ages.

PDF

___

Akın, A. (2008). The scales of psychological well-being: A study of validity and reliability. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8 (3), 741-750.
Ardell, D. B. (1998). The history of wellness. Ardell Wellness Report, 50, 3-11.
Ardell, D. B. (2001). Wellness models. Ardell Wellness Report, 59 (6), 4.
Bree, V. M. B., Passchier, M. J., & Emmen, H. H. (1990). Influence of quality of life and stress coping behavior on headaches in adolescent male students: An explorative study. Headache, 30 (3), 165-168.
Cagle, B. (2000). A survey of status of the life a time wellness course in Tennessee. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, DA. Middle Tennessee State University.
Cenkseven, F. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinde öznel ve psikolojik iyi olmanın yordayıcılarının incelenmesi ?Examining the predictors of subjective and psychological well-being of university students?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Çukuroava Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
Cheng, S. K. & Lam, D. J. (1997). Relationships among life stress, problem solving, self-esteem, and dysphoria in Hong Kong adolescents: test of a model. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16 (3), 343-355.
Cramer, S. R., Nieman, D. C., & Lee, J. W. (1991). The effects of moderate exercise training on psychological well-being and mood state in women. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 35 (4-5), 437-449.
Degges-White, S., Myers, J. E., Adelman, J. U., & Pastoor, D. D. (2003). Examining counseling needs of headache patients: An exploratory study of wellness and perceived stress. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 25 (4), 271-290.
Diener, E. (1994). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 542-575.
Donaghy, K. B. (1995). Beyond survival: Applying wellness interventions in battered women's shelters. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 17 (1), 3-17.
Fişek, N. (1985). Halk sağlığına giriş, Ankara: H.Ü. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü Hizmet Araştırma ve Araştırıcı Yetiştirme Merkezi Yayını No. 2.
Granello, P. F. (1999). College students' wellnes as function of social support and empatnic ability. Journal of College Counseling, 2 (2), 110-120.
Güneri-Yerin, O. (2003). Wellness Inventory. Unpublished manuscript.
Hattie, J. A., Myers, J. E., & Sweeney, T. J. (2004). A factor structure of wellness: theory, assessment, analysis, practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 354-364.
Hermon, D. A. & R. J. Hazler. (1999). Adherence to a wellness model and perceptions of psychological well-being. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77 (3), 339-343.
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Rutledge. Myers, J. E., Sweeney, T. J., & Witmer, J. M. (2000). The wheel of wellness counseling for wellness: A holistic model for treatment planning. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78 (3), 251-266.
Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analiz. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitapevi. 2. Baskı.
Palombi, B. J. (1991). Psychometric properties of wellness instruments. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71 (2), 221-225.
Rosenfeld, L. R. & Richman, J. M. (1998). Low social support among at-risk adolescents. Social Work in Education, 20 (4), 245-260.
Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
Sweeney, T. J. & Witmer, J. M. (1991). Beyond social interest: Striving toward optimum health and wellness. Individual Psychology, 47 (4), 527-540.
Şahin, N.H. ve Durak, A. (1994). Kısa Semptom Envanteri: Türk gençleri için uyarlaması. Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 44-56.
Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychology research. New York: Willey and Sons.
Travis, J. W. & Ryan, R. S. (1998). Wellness workbook (second ed.). California: Ten Speed. Press.
Tuzgöl-Dost, M. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluş düzeyleri ?Subjective well-being levels of university students?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Witmer, J.M., & Sweeney, T. J. (1992). A holistic model for wellness and prevention over life span. Journal of Counseling &, Development, 71(2), 140-148.