The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties among Turkish University Students

The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties among Turkish University Students

Problem statement: Today, it is widely accepted that empathy is a multidimensional factor that facilitates human relations. The common idea that empathy comprises more than one component has created diversity in the assessment of the said factor; many researchers have developed empathy scales that include different dimensions. However, unidimensional assessments minimize differences between assessments and develop an accepted core assessment tool. Purpose of Study: The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) is a selfreport style, uni-dimensional, 16-item, five-point Likert type scale developed to assess the empathy levels of individuals. The objective of this study is to adapt the TEQ into Turkish and to analyze its psychometric properties in a sample of Turkish university students. Methods: Study participants included 698 university students from Ege and Sakarya University. In the research, the Emphatic Tendency Scale and the Basic Empathy Scale were used as data collection tools along with the TEQ. In the adaptation of the questionnaire, a linguistic equivalence study was performed first. The psychometric properties of the TEQ were analyzed through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor

___

  • Aron, A. & Aron, E. N. (2002). Statistiscs for behavioral social sciences. A brief course.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175.
  • Bayam, G., Şimşek, E. U., & Dilbaz, N. (1995). Üç farklı meslek grubunda empatikbeceri düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparision emphatic ability levelbetween three differents profession groups]. Kriz Dergisi, 3(1-2), 205-207.
  • Bora, E. & Baysan, L. (2009). Empati Ölçeği-Türkçe Formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde psikometrik özellikleri [Psychometric features of Turkish version of empathy quotient in university students]. Klinik PsikofarmakolojiBülteni, 19(1), 39-47.
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. İstatistiki araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Statistical research design SPSS applications and interpretation]. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. London: Continuum International Pub.
  • Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment Reseach & Evaluation, 10(7).
  • Dadds, M. R. et al. (2008). A measure of cognitive and affective empathy in children using parent ratings. Child Psychiatry & Human Devolopment, 39, 111–122.
  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.
  • Deniz, K. Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama [The adaptation of psychological scales]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16.
  • Dökmen, Ü. (1987). Empati kurma becerisi ile sosyometrik statü arasındaki ilişki [The relation between empathy ability and sociometric statutes]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakülte Dergisi, 20(1-2), 183-207.
  • Dökmen, Ü. (1988). Empatinin yeni bir modele dayanılarak ölçülmesi ve psikodrama ile geliştirilmesi [Empathy measures based on new methods and its development via psychodrama]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1-2), 155-190.
  • Dökmen, Ü. (2000). İletişim çatışmaları ve empati [Communication conflict and empathy]. İstanbul: Sistem Yayınları.
  • Elliott, R., Filipovich, H., Harrigan, L., Gaynor, J., Reimschuessel, C., & Zapadka, J. K. (1982). Measuring response empathy: The development of a multicomponent rating scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(4), 379-87.
  • Engeler, A. & Yargıç, L. İ. (2007). Kişiler arası tepkisellik indeksi: Empatinin çok boyutlu ölçümü [Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Measurement of Empathy Multidimensionally]. New Symposium Journal, 45(3), 119-127.
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Londra: Sage Publications.
  • Gallup, G. G. J. & Platek, S. M. (2002). Cognitive empathy presupposes selfawareness: Evidence from phylogeny, ontogeny, neuropsychology and mental illness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25(1), 36–37.
  • Gravetter, F.J. & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. (7th Edition). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
  • Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 304-312.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76-83.
  • Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 33, 307–316.
  • İkiz, F. E. (2006). Danışma becerileri eğitiminin danışmanların empatik eğilim, empatikbeceri ve tükenmişlik düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisi [The effect of counseling skillstraining on counselors’ empathic tendency, empathic skill and burnout levels]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Dokuz Eylül University, Instituteof Education Science, İzmir.
  • Jolliffe, D. & Farrington D.P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589–611.
  • Jöreskog, K.G. ve Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, In
  • Kaya, A. & Siyez D. M. (2010). KA-Sİ Çocuk ve ergenler için empatik eğilim ölçeği: Geliştirilmesi geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Child and adolescent KA-Sİ empathic tendecy scale: Development, validity and reliability study]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 110-125.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of Structural Equations Modeling. New York:Guilford.
  • Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004).Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient.Psychological Medicine, 34, 911-924.
  • Marcia, J. (1990). Empathy and psychotherapy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.). Empaty and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mehrabian, A. & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543.
  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research. design and interpretation. California: Sage Publication Inc.
  • Muncer, S. J. & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the empathy quotient (EQ) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1111-1119.
  • Osborne, J. W. & Overbay, A. (2008). Best practices in data cleaning. How outliers and "fringeliers" can increase error rates and decrease the quality and precision of your results. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.). Best practices in quantitative methods. California: Sage Publications.
  • Özbay, Y. & Şahin, M. (2000). Empatik Sınıf Atmosferi Tutum Ölçeği (ESATÖ): Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Validity and reliability of Intraclassroom Empathic Attitude Scale (IEAS)]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 104-113.
  • Pecukonis, E. V. (1990). A cognitive/affective empathy training program as a function of ego development in aggressive adolescent females. Adolescence, 25(97), 59-76.
  • Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Rogers, C. R. (1983). Empatik olmak değeri anlaşılmamış bir varoluş şeklidir[Empathic: An unappreciated way of being]. (Trans. F. Akkoyun). AnkaraÜniversitesitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 103-124.
  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
  • Schwab, J. (2005a). Principal component analysis [Lecturer Notes]. Retrieved 03.03.2010 onhttp://www.utexas.edu/courses/schwab/sw388r7/SolvingProblems/SolvingHomeworkProblems.htm
  • Schwab, J. (2005b). Principal component analysis: Validation, outliers, and reliability [Lecturer Notes]. Retrieved 03.03.2010 on http://www.utexas.edu/courses/schwab/ sw388r7/SolvingProblems/SolvingHomeworkProblems.htm
  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R. D., Goldsher, B., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J.(2004). Impairment in cognitive and affective empathy in patients with brainlesions: Anatomical and cognitive correlates. Journal of Clinical & ExperimentalNeuropsychology, 26, 1113–1127
  • SPSS (2009). PAWS Statistics 18 core system user’s guide. Illinois: SPSS Inc.
  • Spreng, R., N., Kinnon, C. M., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto EmpathyQuestionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analyticsolution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1),62-71.
  • Stephan, W. G. & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729-743.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Topçu, Ç., Baker, Ö. E. ve Aydın, Y. Ç. (2009). Turkish adaptation of Basic Empathy Scale (BES). The First International Congreess of Educational Research. 1- 3.May.2009, Çanakkale, Turkey. Retrieved 03.03.2010 on http://oc.eab.org.tr/egtconf/pdfkitap/ pdf/388.pdf
  • Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in practice. Getting started with a SIMPLIS approach. New York: Springer.
  • Wakabayashi, A. et al. (2006). Development of shorts forms of the empathy quotient(EQ-short) and the systemizing quotient (SQ-short). Personality & IndividualDifferences, 41(5), 929-940.
  • Wispé, L. (1990). History of the concept of empathy. In N. Eisenberg ve J. Strayer (Eds.). Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yüksel, A. (2004). Empati eğitim programının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin empatikbecerilerine etkisi [Empathy education program effects of empathic ability onelementary school student]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2),341-354.