Using Humor in Language Classrooms: Greasing the Wheels or Putting a Spanner in the Works? A Study on Humor Styles of Turkish EFL Instructors
Using Humor in Language Classrooms: Greasing the Wheels or Putting a Spanner in the Works? A Study on Humor Styles of Turkish EFL Instructors
Humor has often been seen as an important element in the learning process, facilitating both teachingand learning. Nevertheless, the utilization of humor in the educational setting has had its opponents. Inrecent years, many attempts have been made to conceptualize the various forms of humor implementedin the practice of education. Despite a myriad of studies aimed at linking humor with personality traits,there seem a dearth number of research studies addressing the multifaceted humor styles of EFLinstructors while interacting with the students in the classroom. There have been a number of scalesthought-up in order to best assess the humor styles of the individual. However, the one identified byMartin et al. (2003) attempts to deal with the functions of humor, rather than particular personalities itmay or may not represent. The four specific humor styles identified in this scale encompass two benign(affiliative and self-enhancing), and two injurious (aggressive and self-defeating) humor styles. Thepresent study seeks to examine the humor styles adopted by English language instructors in Turkey byinvestigating (1) whether there is a difference between male and female instructors with regard toemploying humor, (2) whether the educational level of the participants influences their tendency to usehumor while interacting with the students in the classroom, and (3) whether the age of the instructors isan influential factor in adopting various styles of humor. A total of 64 English language instructorsworking at private and state universities in Turkey completed a standardized form of the Humor StylesQuestionnaire (HSQ) online. Results indicated no significant difference between male and femaleinstructors with regard to adopting humor styles in the classroom. Nor were there any differencesbetween instructors of varying educational level in terms of the use of humor styles. In addition, nodifferences were seen according to age.© 2019 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
___
- Abraham, R. R., Hande, V., Sharma, M. E. J., Wohlrath, S. K., Keet, C. C., & Ravi, S. (2014).
Use of humour in classroom teaching: Students’ perspectives. Thrita, 3(2), 1–4.
- Agcam, R. (2017). Investigating instructors’ perceptions on the use of humour in higher
education. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(2), 238–248.
- Altinkurt, Y., & Yilmaz, K. (2011). Humor styles of primary school teachers. Pegem Journal of
Education and Instruction, 1(2), 1–8.
- Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of humor in the language classroom: Humor as a pedagogical tool
in theory and practice. Arizona Working Papers in SLAT, 12, 45–61.
- Aydin, A. (2015). Identifying the relationship of teacher candidates’ humor styles with anxiety
and self-compassion levels. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1–16.
- Berk, R. (1998). Professors are from mars, students are from snickers: How to write and deliver
humor in the classroom and in professional presentations. Madison, WI: Magna
Publications.
- Bilge, F., & Saltuk, S. (2007). Humor Styles, Subjective Well-beings, Trait Anger and Anxiety
among University Students in Turkey. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(5), 464–469.
- Cecen, R. (2007). Humor styles in predicting loneliness among Turkish university students.
Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(6), 835–844.
- Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
- Dyck, K. T., & Holtzman, S. (2013). Understanding humor styles and well-being: The
importance of social relationships and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55,
53–58.
- Ford, T. E., McCreight, K. A., & Richardson, K. (2014). Affective style, humor styles, and
happiness. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10, 451–463.
- Garner, R. (2003). Which came first, the chicken or the egg? A foul metaphor for teaching.
Radical Pedagogy, 5(2), 205–212.
- Garner, R. (2005). Humor, Analogy, and Metaphor: H.A.M. it up in Teaching. Radical
Pedagogy, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy /Humor,_
Analogy,_and_Metaphor__H.A.M._it_up_in_Teaching.html
- Garner, R. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha! College Teaching, 54(1),
177–180.
- Gonzalez, G. (2014). Ten ways to sabotage your classroom management. Retrieved from
https://www.middleweb.com /19037/10-ways-sabotage-classroom-management/
- Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. (4th ed.). Essex: Longman.
- Huy Hoang, P., & Petraki, E. (2016). Do Asian EFL teachers use humour in the classroom? A
case study of Vietnamese EFL university teachers. System, 61, 98–109.
- Janes, L. M., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Jeer pressure: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule
of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 474–485.
- Kilic, Y. (2016). The views of Turkish teachers on the use of humor in secondary schools.
Educational Research and Reviews, 11(9), 945–956.
- Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A., & Dance, K. (1992). Sense of humor and enhanced quality of life.
Personality and Individual Differences, 13(12), 1273–1283.
- Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1993). Coping humour, stress, and cognitive
appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 81–96.
- Martin, R. A., Lastuk, J. M., Jeffery, J., Vernon, P. A., & Veselka, L. (2012). Relationships
between the dark triad and humor styles: A replication and extension. Personality and
Individual Differences, 52, 178–182.
- Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1984). The situational humor response questionnaire:
Quantitative measure of sense of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,
145–155.
- Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences
in the uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the
humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.
- Martin, R. A. (1996). The situational humor response questionnaire (SHRQ) and coping humor
scale (CHS): A decade of research findings. Humor, 9, 251–272.
- McNamara, T. (2004). Language Testing. In A. Davies, & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of
applied linguistics (p. 763–783). Blackwell.
- Overholser, J. S. (1992). Sense of humor when coping with life stress. Personality and
Individual Differences, 13(7), 799–804.
- Oxford, R. L. (1999). Anxiety and the language learner: new insights. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect
in language learning (pp. 58–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ozyesil, Z. (2012). The prediction level of self-esteem on humor style and positive-negative
affection. Psychology, 3(8), 638–641.
- Schermer, J.A., Martin, R. A., Martin, N. G., Lynskey, M., & Vernon, P. A. (2013). The general
factor of personality and humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 890–893.
- Steele, K. E. (1998). The positive and negative effects of the use of humor in the classroom
setting (Unpublished MA thesis). Salem, Teikyo University.
Sudol, D. (1981). Dangers of classroom humour. English Journal, 70(6), 26–28.
- Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a multidimensional
sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 13–23.
- Thorson, J. A., Powell, F. C., Sarmany-Schuller, I., & Hampes, W. P. (1997). Psychological
health and sense of humor. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 605–619.
- Traş, Z., Arslan, C., & Mentiş Taş, A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarında mizah tarzları, problem
çözme ve benlik saygısının incelenmesi [Analysis of humor styles, problem solving and selfesteem of prospective teachers]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2), 716–732.
- Tucker, R. P., Wingate, L. R., O’Keefe, V. M., Slish, M. L., Judah, M. R., & Rhoades-Kerswill,
S. (2013). The moderating effect of humor style on the relationship between interpersonal
predictors of suicide and suicidal ideation. Personality and Individual Differences,
54, 610–615.
- Tumkaya, S. (2011). Humor styles and socio-demographic variables as predictors of subjective
well-being of Turkish university students. Education and Science, 36(160), 158–170.
- Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Martin, R. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). Relations between humor
styles and the dark triad traits of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48,
772–774.
- Vrabel, J. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Shango, R. (2016). Spitefulness and humor styles. Personality
and Individual Differences, 105, 238–243.
- Yerlikaya, E. (2003). A study on the adaptation of humor styles questionnaire (Unpublished
master dissertation). Institute of Social Sciences, Adana: Cukurova University.
- Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of
Experimental Education, 57(1), 5–15.