The Role of Vocabulary vs. Syntactic Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension
The Role of Vocabulary vs. Syntactic Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension
Research in literature reports the importance of L2 vocabulary and syntactic knowledge on the learners’reading comprehension. In this regard, the current study investigated the role of vocabulary knowledgethat is disunited into depth and breadth dimensions and syntactic knowledge in the readingcomprehension scores of an advanced cohort of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Inparticular, this study examined the relationship of vocabulary knowledge (with its two dimensions) andsyntactic knowledge with reading comprehension scores of 30 Turkish EFL learners and the extent towhich these knowledge types explain the variance in reading comprehension scores. Measures ofvocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, syntactic knowledge and reading comprehension were used. Thedata analysis procedure included the descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlations andmultiple regression analysis. The results showed that the depth of vocabulary knowledge predicts the L2reading comprehension the best when the effect of vocabulary size and syntactic knowledge is controlled.These findings are discussed at the end of the study with future research suggestions and limitations.© 2019 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
___
- Barnett, M. A. (1986). Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading:
Importance and interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 343-349.
- Brantmeier, C. (2003). Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in
second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(1), 1-27.
- Bossers, B. H. (1992). Reading in two languages: A study of reading comprehension in Dutch as
a second language and in Turkish as a first language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Free University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. M. (2007). Instruction of
metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of
third-grade students. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.1.7
- Chen, K. Y. (2009). An Explanatory Mixed Methods Study of EFL College Students' Vocabulary
Knowledge, Syntactic Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. Retrieved from ProQuest
Dissertations Publishing. (Dissertation number: 3363973; ProQuest document ID:
305149263)
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson.
- Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative
contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can
depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277-299.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
- Demir, E., Saatçioğlu, Ö., & İmrol, F. (2016). Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan eğitim
araştırmalarının normallik varsayımları açısından incelenmesi. Current Research in
Education, 2(3), 130-148.
- Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York,
NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
- Goulder, R., Nation, P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied
Linguistics, 11(4), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.4.341
- Kaivanpanah, S., & Zandi, H. (2009). The role of depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading
comprehension in EFL context. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 698-706.
- Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: words you don’t know, words
you think you know and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second
Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, (20-52), Cambridge University
Press.
- Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: do we need both to
measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, 21(2), 202-226.
https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt277oa
- Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL
students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language learning, 57(1),
87-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x
- McGraw, H., (2009). The official guide to the TOEFL test (3rd ed.). New York, USA:
Educational Testing Service.
- Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?. Canadian
Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
- Peretz, A. S., & Shoham, M. (1990). Testing reading comprehension in LSP: Does topic
familiarity affect assessed difficulty and actual performance. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 7(1), 447-455.
- Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in
reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282-308.
https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282
- Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and
academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513–
536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
- Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language
Testing, 10(3), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000308
- Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two
new version of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88.
https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103
- Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J. H., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language-specific
knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study
among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1), 71-106.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00033
- Sellers, V. D. (2000). Anxiety and reading comprehension in Spanish as a foreign
language. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 512-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-
9720.2000.tb01995.x
- Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (Complete
samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.
- Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and
vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language
Testing, 24(1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal.2011.028
- Urguhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and
practice. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
- Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., &
Stevenson, M. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive
knowledge in first-and second-language reading comprehension: A componential
analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
0663.96.1.19
- Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific
Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0404_4
- Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the
amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.3.420
- Zhang, D. (2012). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading
comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language
Journal, 96(4), 558-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01398.x
- Zimmerman, C. (1996). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J.
Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for
Pedagogy (5-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524643.003