___

• Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64. doi: 10.1093/elt/56.1.57
• Bandura, S. A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Barraclough, R.A., Christophel, D.M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1988). Willingness to communicate: A cross‐cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 187-192.
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 5(1), 1-40.
• Brown, E. L. (2004). The relationship of self-concepts to changes in cultural diversity awareness: Implications for urban teacher educators. The Urban View, 36(2), 119-145.
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson.
• Burden, R. L. (2012). Handbook to the myself-as-a-learner-scale (MALS). Exeter: Exeter Cognitive Education Centre.
• Byram, M. (1997) ‘Culture awareness’ as vocabulary learning. Language Learning Journal, 16, 51–57.
• Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 427-456.
• Canagarajah, A. (1999). Interrogating the “native speaker fallacy”: Non-linguistic roots, non-pedagogical results. In Braine, G. (1999) (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
• Chen, G.M., & Starosta, W. J. (1999). A review of the concept of intercultural awareness. Human Communication, 2, 27-54.
• Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of contexts, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209.
• Csizer, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal 89(1), 19-36.
• Csizer, K., & Lukacs, G. (2010). The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38, 1–13.
• De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 132–150.
• Demir-Ayaz, A. (2016). The relationship between foreign language learners' future second language (L2) self-guides, language learning motivation and achievement. Unpublished master's thesis. Hacettepe University, Turkey.
• De Saint Leger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269-285.
• Deardorff, D.K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241-266.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivation in second language learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 518-531). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
• Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia, PA.
• Erten, İ. H., & Burden, R. L. (2014). The relationship between academic self-concept, attributions, and L2 achievement. System, 42, 391-401.
• Gu, M. M., & Cheung, D. S. (2016). Ideal L2 self, acculturation, and Chinese language learning among South Asian students in Hong Kong: A structural equation modeling analysis. System, 57, 14-24.
• Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29-70.
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94 (3), 319-340.
• Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49 (5), 505-528.
• Huang, H.T., Hsu, C.C., & Chen, S.W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51, 28-38.
• Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8-28.
• Jonkmann, K., Becker, M., Marsh, H. W. Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Personality traits moderate the Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect of academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 736-746.
• Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lanvers, U. (2016). Lots of selves, some rebellious: Developing the self-discrepancy model for language learners. System, 60, 79-92.
• Liddicoat, A. (2002). Static and dynamic views of culture and intercultural language acquisition. Babel, 36(3), 4-11.
• Linder, R. (2010). Introducing a micro-skills approach to intercultural approach to intercultural learning to an English for specific purposes course for students of sociology. Scripta Mament, 5(1-2), 9-24.
• Liu, W. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2005). Academic self-concept: A cross-sectional study of grade and gender differences in a Singapore secondary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 20-27.
• MacIntyre, P. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135-142.
• MacIntyre, P. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(iv), 564-576.
• MacIntyre, P., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 3-26.
• MacIntyre, P., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388.
• MacIntyre, P., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537-564.
• MacIntyre, P., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545-562.
• Markus, H.R. & Nurius, P. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. and Kong, C.K. (2002). Multilevel casual ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Influence of language of instruction (English compared with Chinese) for Hong Kong students. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 727-763.
• Marsh, H.W. and Craven, R.G. (2006).Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133-163.
• McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16-25.
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Denwer, Co, USA.
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In J. C. McCroskey and J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129-156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: a cognitive view. In M. Both-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition and anxiety (pp. 19–44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Mirzaei A., & Forouzandeh, F. (2013). Relationship between intercultural communicative competence and L2- learning motivation of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42, 300-318.
• Nieto, S. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
• Öz, H. (2015). Ideal L2 self as a predictor of intercultural communicative competence. Anthropologist, 19(1), 41-53.
• Öz, H. (2016). Role of the ideal L2 self in predicting willingness to communicate of EFL students. In İ. H. Mirici, İ. H. Erten, H. Öz, & I. Vodopija-Krstanovic (Eds.), Research papers as an Additional Language (pp. 163-182). Rijeka: Faculty of Humanities and Social Research.
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. New York: Open University Press.
• Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467–479.
• Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1-9.
• Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an Intensive English Language Program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 2, 33-59.
• Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
• Roach, K. D., & Olaniran, B. A. (2001). Intercultural willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in international teaching assistants. Communication Research Reports, 18(1), 26-35.
• Ryan, S. & Dörnyei, Z. (2013). The long-term evolution of language motivation and the L2 self. In A. Berndt (Ed.), Fremdsprachen in der perspektive lebenslangen lernens (pp. 89-100). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Ryan, S. (2006). Language learning motivation within the context of globalisation: An L2 self within an imagined global community. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3(1), 23-45.
• Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441.
• Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 80(1), 55-66.
• Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L and Shimuzi, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152.