Exploring Relations between Pre-Service English Teachers' Psychological and Social Well-Being and their Perceptions of Positive Classroom Environment

This paper reports on findings of a research study that sought to investigate the relationship between classroom environment and candidate teachers' social and psychological wellbeing. Dimensions of psychological and social well-being models include constructs such as personal growth, positive relations with others, and social contribution. Such constructs have impacts on teachers' creating a positive classroom environment, which is a predictor of students' academic achievement. Therefore, this study aims at exploring whether and how psychological and social well-being shape candidate teachers' perceptions of positive classroom environment. To address the focus of this study, the data were collected from 157 senior students at the English Language Teaching department through three questionnaires. The questionnaires measured mainly three variables: Participants' perceptions of positive classroom environment and their psychological and social well-being. The relationships between these variables were tested through Structural Equation Model (SEM) using AMOS (22.0). The results of the study revealed some significant relationships between some of the dimensions only, which may indicate that the participant pre-service teachers are expected to promote positive classroom environment in some aspects, but not all. Regarding this, the study provides valuable suggestions to be included in teacher development programs.

___

  • Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57- 64. http://doi.org/c76979
  • Bandura, S. A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Barraclough, R.A., Christophel, D.M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1988). Willingness to communicate: A cross‐cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 187-192. http://doi.org/crrzxn
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 5(1), 1-40. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23361533
  • Brown, E. L. (2004). The relationship of self-concepts to changes in cultural diversity awareness: Implications for urban teacher educators. The Urban View, 36(2), 119-145. http://doi.org/fr4ms2
  • Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson.
  • Burden, R. L. (2012). Handbook to the myself-as-a-learner-scale (MALS). Exeter: Exeter Cognitive Education Centre.
  • Byram, M. (1997) ‘Culture awareness’ as vocabulary learning. Language Learning Journal, 16, 51–57. http://doi.org/d5rn8s
  • Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 427-456. http://doi.org/bk3qkw
  • Canagarajah, A. (1999). Interrogating the “native speaker fallacy”: Non-linguistic roots, nonpedagogical results. In Braine, G. (1999) (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Chen, G.M., & Starosta, W. J. (1999). A review of the concept of intercultural awareness. Human Communication, 2, 27-54.
  • Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of contexts, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209. http://doi.org/b5t6nn
  • Csizer, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal 89(1), 19-36. http://doi.org/ch8w8z
  • Csizer, K., & Lukacs, G. (2010). The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38, 1–13. http://doi.org/bvdjn9
  • De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 132–150. http://doi.org/dx6cv4
  • Demir-Ayaz, A. (2016). The relationship between foreign language learners’ future second language (L2) self-guides, language learning motivation and achievement. Unpublished master’s thesis. Hacettepe University, Turkey.
  • De Saint Leger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269-285. http://doi.org/c3wx74
  • Deardorff, D.K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241-266. http://doi.org/bbc3tt
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivation in second language learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 518-531). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia, PA.
  • Erten, İ. H., & Burden, R. L. (2014). The relationship between academic self-concept, attributions, and L2 achievement. System, 42, 391-401. http://doi.org/brhd
  • Gu, M. M., & Cheung, D. S. (2016). Ideal L2 self, acculturation, and Chinese language learning among South Asian students in Hong Kong: A structural equation modeling analysis. System, 57, 14-24. http://doi.org/brhf
  • Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29-70.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94 (3), 319-340. http://doi.org/bscmc3
  • Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49 (5), 505-528. http://doi.org/dx34d7
  • Huang, H.T., Hsu, C.C., & Chen, S.W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51, 28-38. http://doi.org/brhg
  • Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8-28. http://doi.org/b57br4
  • Jonkmann, K., Becker, M., Marsh, H. W. Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Personality traits moderate the Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect of academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 736-746. http://doi.org/brhh
  • Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lanvers, U. (2016). Lots of selves, some rebellious: Developing the self-discrepancy model for language learners. System, 60, 79-92. http://doi.org/brhj
  • Liddicoat, A. (2002). Static and dynamic views of culture and intercultural language acquisition. Babel, 36(3), 4-11. [This paper was originally delivered as the inaugural Keitrh Horwood Lecture at the AFMLTA National Conference (2001: Canberra). Retrived from
  • Linder, R. (2010). Introducing a micro-skills approach to intercultural approach to intercultural learning to an English for specific purposes course for students of sociology. Scripta Mament, 5(1-2), 9-24. Retrieved from http://www.sdutsj.edus.si/ScriptaManent/2 010_5_1,2/Lindner.pdf
  • Liu, W. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2005). Academic self-concept: A cross-sectional study of grade and gender differences in a Singapore secondary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 20-27. http://doi.org/bckx62
  • MacIntyre, P. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135-142. http://doi.org/dns76f
  • MacIntyre, P. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(iv), 564-576. http://doi.org/cp7vbz
  • MacIntyre, P., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 3-26. http://doi.org/b3xstm
  • MacIntyre, P., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388.
  • MacIntyre, P., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537-564. http://doi.org/d8f75q
  • MacIntyre, P., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545-562. http://doi.org/bk63vg
  • Markus, H.R. & Nurius, P. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969. http://doi.org/dsg7rt
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Kong, C.K. (2002). Multilevel casual ordering of academic selfconcept and achievement: Influence of language of instruction (English compared with Chinese) for Hong Kong students. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 727-763. http://doi.org/dctzjt
  • Marsh, H.W. and Craven, R.G. (2006).Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133-163. http://doi.org/czcpj7
  • McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25. http://doi.org/c9dsfz
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Denwer, Co, USA.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In J. C. McCroskey and J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129-156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: a cognitive view. In M. Both-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition and anxiety (pp. 19–44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Mirzaei A., & Forouzandeh, F. (2013). Relationship between intercultural communicative competence and L2- learning motivation of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42, 300-318. http://doi.org/brhk
  • Nieto, S. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
  • Öz, H. (2015). Ideal L2 self as a predictor of intercultural communicative competence. Anthropologist, 19(1), 41-53. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/JovU3r
  • Öz, H. (2016). Role of the ideal L2 self in predicting willingness to communicate of EFL students. In İ. H. Mirici, İ. H. Erten, H. Öz, & I. Vodopija-Krstanovic (Eds.), Research papers as an Additional Language (pp. 163-182). Rijeka: Faculty of Humanities and Social Research.
  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. New York: Open University Press.
  • Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467–479. http://doi.org/dfs8t4
  • Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1-9. http://doi.org/brhm
  • Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an Intensive English Language Program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 2, 33-59. Retrieved from http://faculty.edfac.usyd.edu.au/projects/usp_i n_tesol/pdf/volume02/article02.pdf
  • Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
  • Roach, K. D., & Olaniran, B. A. (2001). Intercultural willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in international teaching assistants. Communication Research Reports, 18(1), 26-35. http://doi.org/fdxr47
  • Ryan, S. & Dörnyei, Z. (2013). The long-term evolution of language motivation and the L2 self. In A. Berndt (Ed.), Fremdsprachen in der perspektive lebenslangen lernens (pp. 89-100). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  • Ryan, S. (2006). Language learning motivation within the context of globalisation: An L2 self within an imagined global community. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3(1), 23-45. http://doi.org/c8sgtd
  • Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170010
  • Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 80(1), 55-66. http://doi.org/bh4g2f
  • Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L and Shimuzi, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152. http://doi.org/ff3mf4