___

• Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 57-86). London: Equinox Press.
• Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in L2 French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of Proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. http://doi.org/cs3dz8
• Anani Sarab, M. R., & Gordani, Y. (2015). The role of private speech in cognitive regulation of learners: The case of English as a foreign language education. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1-10.
• Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42 (3), 576-598.
• Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214.
• Bitchener, J. Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.
• Butler, Y. (2002). Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (3), 451-480.
• Davin, K. J. (2011). Group dynamic assessment in an early foreign language learning program: Tracking movement through the zone of proximal development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://dscholarship.pitt.edu/7269/1/DAVINKJ_ETD.pdf
• De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 84 (1), 51-68. http://doi.org/bm2kk5
• DiCamilla, F., & Anton, M. (2004). Private speech: a study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(1), 36–69.
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (1), 1-11.
• Guk, I., & D. Kellogg. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11 (3), 281-299.
• Kao, Y. (2015). How interactive discussions support writing development: the application of Dynamic Assessment for learning Chinese rhetoric. Language Testing in Asia, 5(14), 1-16.
• Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Lantolf, J. (2012). Sociocultural Theory: A Dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass and A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57-72).
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 49-72.
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. London: Routledge.
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lantolf, J. P., & Yáñez-Prieto, C. (2003). Talking yourself into Spanish: Intrapersonal communication and second language learning. Hispania, 86 (1), 97-109.
• Lidz, C. (1987). Dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
• Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Mahwah, New Jersey London.
• Liu, D., & Gleason, J. I. (2002). Acquisition of the article the by nonnative speakers of English: An analysis of four nongeneric uses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 1-26.
• Master, P. (1995). Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In D. Belcher and G. Briane (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 183- 204). New York: Ablex.
• McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold.
• Moradian, M., & Baharvand, P. (2015). The effect of group dynamic assessment on raising young Iranian EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness and listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 67-86.
• Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective towards corrective feedback in L2: The Effect of random vs. negotiated help on the acquisition of English articles. Language Awareness, 9 (1), 34-51. http://doi.org/fbc2xk
• Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Petrovsky, A. V. (1985). Studies in psychology. The Collective and the individual. Moscow: Progress.
• Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91 (3), 323-340.
• Poehner, M.E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.
• Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43 (3), 471-491.
• Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P. (2016). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/tesq.308.
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9 (1), 1-33.
• Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. (2010). Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The Case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17 (4), 312-330.
• Poehner, M. E., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (2), 183-198.
• Rahimi, M., Kushki, A., & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and Developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(2), 185-208.
• Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283.
• Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2013). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Awareness, 64 (1), 103-131.
• Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10 (2), 29-46.
• Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Swain, M., Huang, L. S., Barkaoui, K., Brooks, L., & Lapkin, S. (2009). The speaking section of the TOEFL iBT™ (SSTiBT): Test-takers’ reported strategic behaviors (TOEFL iBT™ Research Series No. TOEFLiBT-10). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
• van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39–60.
• van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L., (2013). Group dynamics in language classroom: embodied participation as active reception in the collective Zone of Proximal Development. Classroom Discourse, 4(1), 1-21.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.