Türkiye’nin FATIH Projesine İlişkin Sosyal Medyada Yer Alan Görüşler Üzerine Bir Söylem Analizi
Türkiye'nin Eğitimde FATİH projesi, eğitimde eşitliği sağlamayı ve okullarda teknolojik altyapıyı geliştirmeyi amaçlayan dünyanın en geniş çaplı eğitim teknolojisi projelerinden biridir. Türkiye'nin en popüler sosyal medya platformlarından biri olan Ekşi Sözlük, bilgiyi yeni bir kamusal alan olarak yorumlamada ve yeniden üretmede önemli bir etken olmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Ekşi Sözlük FATİH projesi ile ilgili olarak yer alan söylemler içerisindeki konu başlıklarını söylem analizi yöntemiyle incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. 2010 ve 2017 arasında yayımlanan toplam 307 gönderi, söylem analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, FATİH projesinin, eğitimsel boyuttan ziyade teknolojik, politik-ideolojik ve proje tasarım boyutları açısından kamusal alanda tartışıldığını göstermiştir.
A Discourse Analysis of Social Media Voices on Turkey’s FATIH Project
FATIH project of Turkey is one of the largest educationaltechnology projects in the world that aims to ensure equality ineducation and to improve technological infrastructure atschools. Ekşi Sözlük, one of the most popular social mediaplatforms in Turkey, has been an important agent in interpreting and reproducing information as a new public sphere. Thisstudy aims to explore the topics presented within the discourses in Ekşi Sözlük regarding FATIH project. A total of 307 entriesposted between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed using themethod of discourse analysis. The results showed that FATIHproject has been discussed in public sphere in terms of technological, political-ideological and project design dimensionsrather than the educational dimension.
___
- Akgül, M. (2013). FATIH Project: Problems, Risks and Concerns [FATIH Projesi: Sorunlar, Riskler ve
Endişeler]. http://dergi.bmo.org.tr/egitim/FATIH-projesi-sorunlar-riskler-ve-endiseler
Accessed on May 5, 2017.
- Akgün, E., Yılmaz, E.O., and Seferoğlu, S.S. (2011). Vision 2023 strategy document and the
movement to increase opportunities and improve technology (FATİH) project: A comparative
review [Vizyon 2023 strateji belgesi ve fırsatları artırma ve teknolojiyi iyileştirme hareketi
(FATİH) projesi: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme].Akademik Bilişim, 2(4), 115-122.
- Atabek, Ü. (2005). New Communication Technologies and Media [Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri ve
Medya]. İstanbul: IPS İletişim Vakfı Yayınları
- Armağan, A. and Deniz, Ş. (2012). Representation of child abuse on social networking platforms:
presentation of children staying in Pozanti juvenile hall on ekşi sözlük. The Journal of Academic
Social Science Studies, 5(7).
- Alexa (2018) http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eksisozluk.com, Web, accessed in February 15, 2018.
- Ayvacı, H.Ş., Bakırcı, H., and Başak, M.H. (2014). The evaluation of problems emerging during the
implementation process of fatih project by administrators, teachers and students. YYU J. Educ.
Faculty, 9, 21-47.
- Bozkurt, A. (2014).Network society and knowledge. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(4), 510-525.
- Coruk, A., and Tutkun, T. (2018). Teacher Concerns towards the Fatih Project in Education. Turkish
Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(4), 42-53.
- Çelik, H. and Ekşi, H. (2008). Discourse analysis. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, (27),
99-117.
- Çiftçi, S., Musa Taşkaya, S., and Alemdar, M. (2013). The opinions of classroom teachers about
Fatih Project. Ilkogretim Online, 12(1).
- Demir, F. (2011). The role of negotiation in public policy making process and the democratization
of public policy process [Kamu politikası oluşturma sürecinde “müzakere” nin rolü ve kamu
politikası sürecinin demokratikleştirilmesi], (Ed. Alican Kaptı) Kamu Politika Süreci. Seçkin,
Ankara.
- Doğan, D., Çınar, M. and Seferoğlu, S.S. (2016). “One Laptop per Child” projects and FATIH
project: A comparative examination. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 1-26.
- Donmuş Kaya, V., & Pepeler, E. (2018). An investigation of some variables in terms of teacher’s
competencies about using interactive whiteboard. Firat University Journal of Social
Sciences, 28(2).
- Dursun, Ö.Ö., Kuzu, A., Kurt, A.A., Güllüpınar, F., and Gültekin, M. (2013). Views of school
administrators’ on Fatih projects pilot implementation process. Trakya University Journal of
Education, 3(1), 100-113.
- Ekici, S. and Yılmaz, B. (2013).An evaluation on Fatih project. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 317-339.
- Elliott, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: exploring action, function and conflict in social texts.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 14, 6, 65.
- García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2016, September). A brief introduction to TACCLE 3—coding European
project. In Computers in Education (SIIE), 2016 International Symposium on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
- Gökmen, Ö.F., Duman, İ., and Akgün, Ö.E. (2018). Teachers' Views about the Use of Tablet
Computers Distributed in Schools as Part of the Fatih Project. Malaysian Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 6(2), 21-37.
- Friedland, L.A., Hove, T., & Rojas, H., (2006). The Networked Public Sphere. Javnost-The
Public/European Institute for Communication & Culture, 13(4), 5-26.
- Forester, J. (2010). Theories of Mass Communication [Kitle İletişim Kuramları] (Ed. Mutlu). Ankara:
Ütopya.
- Information Society Strategy and Action Plan (2006–2010),
http://www.edevlet.gov.tr/2015/10/13/2006-2010-bilgi-toplumu-stratejisi-ve-eylem-plani/
Web, accessed on April 12, 2018.
- Kirbas, A. (2018). Student Views on Using Smart Boards in Turkish Education.Universal Journal of
Educational Research, 6(5), 1040-1049.
- Ministry of Development Information Society Department. (2015, March). 2015 - 2018
Information Society Strategy and Action Plan. Information Society Strategy Project and
Participation Portal:
http://www.bilgitoplumustratejisi.org/tr/doc/8a9481984680deca014bea4232490005
Website, accessed on November 4, 2017.
- Ministry of Development (2013). Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018)
http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Pages/KalkinmaPlanlari.aspx accessed in May 5, 2017.
- Ministry of Education, (2015) 2015-2019 Strategic Plan, MNE Strategy Development Unit, Ankara.
(T. C. Ministry of Development Information Society Department, 2015)
- Ministry of Education (2017) About FATIH Project in Education.
http://FATIHprojesi.meb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda/ accessed on May 5, 2017.
- Öçal, M.F. and Şimşek, M. (2017). Mathematics teacher candidates' views on FATIH project and
the use of technology in mathematics education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative
Inquiry, 8(1), 91-121.
- Pamuk, S., Cakir, R., Ergun, M., Yilmaz, H.B., and Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet PC and
interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of the FATİH
Project. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822.
- Postman, N. (2004). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business.
Penguin.
- Sözen, E. (1999). Discourse: uncertainty, exchange, knowledge, power and reflexivity [Söylem:
belirsizlik, mübadele, bilgi, güç ve refleksivite]. İstanbul: Paradigma.
- Taşdemir, B. and Çevik, R. (2013). Dominant Design and Sourtimes Dictionary: Understanding the
Transformation of Internet. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 1(37).
- Timisi, N. (2003). New Communication Technologies and Democracy [Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri ve
Demokrasi]. Ankara: Dost.
- Turkish Statistical Institute (2016), "Youth in Statistics"
http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24648 accessed in May 12, 2017.
- Uçkan, Ö. (2003). E-government, e-democracy and Turkey [E-Devlet, E-Demokrasi ve Türkiye].
İstanbul: Literatür.
- Van Dijk, T. (Ed.) (1997). Discourse as structure and process(Vol. 1). London: Sage.
- Van Dijk, T. (2005). Söylemin yapıları ve iktidarın yapıları.Der: Mehmet Küçük, Medya İktidar
İdeoloji, Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat
- Van Dijk, T. (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects Of New Media. London: Sage Publications.
- Volkmer, I. (2003). The Global Network Society and Global PublicSphere, Society for International
Development: Thematic Section, 46(1), 9-16.
- Yaşaroğlu, C. (2018). The investigation of teachers’ expectations and recommendations on Fatih
project.Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(15), 147-159
- Yengin, D. (2012). Critical Review of New Media, New Media and … [Yeni Medyaya Eleştirel Bakış,
Yeni Medya ve…], İstanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar.
- Yolcu, H., and Bayram, A. (2016). Usage of technology in education: a critical view on the Fatih
project. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 2111-2143.
- Yükselbaba, Ü. (2008). Public sphere models and context of these models. İstanbul Üniversitesi
Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66(2), 227-271.