Mustafa TÜYSÜZ

Deniz ticareti Hukukunda hazırlık ihbarı

Hazırlık ihbarı, geminin, yükleme veya boşaltma yerine vardığının taşı-yan tarafından taşıtanlara bildirilmesidir. Hazırlık ihbarı, gemin vardığı ve yükleme/boşaltmaya (yüke, denize elverişlilik gibi) tüm açılardan hazır ol-duğu anlamına gelir. Hazırlık ihbarı, çarter partilerde aksine bir hüküm yoksa, sözlü olarak verilir. Öte yandan, hazırlık ihbarı starya süresinin baş-laması için gereklidir. Hazırlık ihbarı verilebilmesi için geminin çarter par-tide belirlenen rıhtıma yanaşmış olması ve bazı formalitelerin yerine getiril-miş olması gerekir. Bununla birlikte, çarter partilere konan klozlarla bunun aksine düzenleme yapılabilir. Bu klozlar arasında wipon (gemi limanda ol-sun olması), wibon (gemi rıhtıma yanaşsın yanaşması), time lost (rıhtım beklenirken kaybolan zamanın staryadan sayılması) veya serbest pratika alınsın alınmasın gibi klozlar yer almaktadır. Bu klozlar gereği, geçerli bir hazırlık ihbarında bulunabilmek için geminin rıhtıma yanaşması veya bazı formalitelerin yerine getirilmesi aranmamıştır

Notice of readiness in the maritime trade law

Once the vessel has arrived at the place for loading and is ready to load, notice of readiness can and must be given to the charterer This notice informs the charterer that the ship has arrived at the port and is ready in all respects to load or discharge. Unless the charter party provides otherwise, notice of readiness may be oral. The notice of readiness is required for the initiation of laytime. For the notice to be effective, the vessel must actually be prepared to receive or to discharge cargo. The charter party may contain a wibon (whether in berth or not) or time lost (time lost in waiting for berth to count as loading/discharging time) or whether free partique or not claus İf the loading/discharging berth is not available on the vessel’s arrival at or off the port of loading/discharging, the vessel shal be entitled to give notice of readiness on arrival there.

PDF

___

Andrewartha, Jane, “English Maritime Law Update: 2007”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 2008, s. 389-433.
Andrewartha, Jane/Borrowdale, Kate, “English Maitime Law Update: 2002”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 2003, s. 413-450.
Andrewartha, Jane/Hayhurst, Penny, “English Maritime Law Update: 1998”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 1999, s. 457-487.
Andrewartha, Jane/Norris, Riley, English Maritime Law Update: 2001”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 2002, s. 329-370.
Aspragkathou, Despoina, “Review of The Gencon Charter Clauses for the Commencement of Laytime: Analysis of The "Time Lost in Waitıng for a Berth yo Count as Laytime or Time on Demurrage" Clause”, Jourmal of Maritime Law Commerce, October, 2007 (Review of The Gencon Charter), s. 603-616.
Aspragkathou, Despoina, “The Happy Day and Issues of the Invalidity of a Notice Of Readiness under English Law”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 2007, s.192 (Notice of Readiness), s. 191-214.
Atamer, Kerim, “Bir Navlun Sözleşmesinde Yer Alan Whether In Bert Or Not Klozunun Uygulama Alanı ve Davada İleri Sürülmesi”, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi, Yıl: 1991, S.1, C.65, s. 60-94.
Bulow, Lucienne Carasso, “Charter Party Consequences of Maritime Security Initiatives: Potential Disputes and Responsive Clauses”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, January, 2006, s. 79-112.
Burke, Raymond, J., “Admiralty Law Institute: Symposium on Charter Parties: Voyage Charters -- Special Problems”, Tulane Law Review, May, 1975, s. 937-956.
Bush, Philip, “Charter Party Symposium: Delay and Detention”, 25 Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Summer, 2001, s. 441-468.
Cromwell, A. Anderson, “Admiralty Law Institute: Symposium on Charter Parties: Time and Voyage Charters: Proceeding to Loading Port, Loading, and Related Problems” Tulane Law Review, May, 1975, s. 880-899.
Çağa, Tahir/Kender, Rayegân, Deniz Ticaret Hukuku, C. 2, 8. Baskı, İstanbul, 2006.
Demir-Araz, Yeliz, “GENCON (94) Sefer Çarteri Sözleşmesinde Sürastarya Klozu”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Yıl, 2004, C. 3, S. 5, s. 85-118.
Felsted, Andrea, “Legal Focus: Good news from Appeal Court – but caution is stil”, Lloyd‟s List, 3 June, 1998.
Gaisford, Robert, E., “Cancellation of Voyage Charterparties: A Comparison of Chinese and English Law”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 1996, s. 293-304.
Hobbs, Chris, “Legal Focus: When NOR decisions support different views: When is a Notice of Readiness valid”, Lloyd‟s List, 29 April, 1998.
Howard, Tim/Davenport, Brian, “English Maritime Law Update 1994/1995”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 1996, s. 427-452.
Karakadılar, Nejat, “Deniz Ticaret Hukukunda Yükleme ve Boşaltma Müddeti (Starya Süresi)”, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi, S.1, Yıl: 1986, s. 27-62.
Kender, Rayegân/Çetingil, Ergon, Deniz Ticareti Hukuku (Takip Hukuku ve Deniz Sigortaları ile Birlikte) Temel Bilgiler, 9. Baskı, İstanbul, 2007.
Kumar, Selva, “Laytime does not begin if no valid notice is given: English court”, The Business Times Singapore, 13 July, 2001.
Kumar, Selva, “Notice of readiness hangs on truthfulness, not time or place”, Business Times -Singapore, 31 July, 1998.
Kumar, Selva, “Notice of readiness linked to start of laytime”, The Business Times Singapore, 4 August, 2006.
Kumar, Selva, “When notice of readiness tendered outside specified period is valid”, Business Times-Singapore, 25 April, 1997.
Kumar, Selva, Charterer has absolute duty to provide cargo: court, The Business Times Singapore, 19 December, 2003.
Mabane, Richard, “Mass Glory shows need for masters to tender valid notices of readiness”, Lloyd‟s List, 20 February, 2002.
Macauley, Thomas, G., “Comments: Laytime And Time On Demurrage: Should Their Exceptions Be Coextensive?”, Tulane Law Review, January, 1994, s. 627-655.
McIntoshn, Alex, “Laytime decision unpopular”, Lloyd‟s List, 7 February 2001.
Moore, Ann, “Accurate notice of readine not a „nullity‟…”, Llyod‟s List, 7 December, 1996.
Moore, Ann, “Law: Award should be remitted to arbitrator for further con-sideration – Is a notice of readiness to load valid even if the ship is not ac-tually ready to load “, Lloyd‟s List, 2 July, 1993.
Moore, Ann, “Law: Charterer appeals in „Antclizo‟ case”, Lloyd‟s List, 25 January, 1992.
Okay, Sami, Deniz Ticaret Hukuku II, 2. Baskı, İstanbul, 1971.
Pearson, Roger, “High Court ruling in Front Commander case gives laytime guidance: Tidebrook and Vitol dispute could prove useful to others”, Lloyd‟s List, 23, November, 2005.
Shaw, Nick/Galloway, Diane, “Shipping: An İll Wind Blows”, Legal Week, 1 December 2005 http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/news/1166756/shipping-an-ill-wind-blows (1.8.2011).
Summerskill, Michael, B., Laytime, Fouth Edition, London, 1989.
Tetley, William, “Good Faith in Contract: Particularly in the Contracts of Arbitration and Chartering”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, Octo-ber, 2004, s. 561-617.
Textor, James, “OilVoy Clauses - Vessel Late Arrival at Load Port: Recovery of Commercial Damages”, Tulane Maritime Law journal, Summer, 2003, s. 467-497.
Ülgener, Fehmi, GENCON 94 Çarter Partisine Genel Bir Bakış, Deniz Hu-kuku Dergisi, Yıl:1, Sayı:1, s. 23-24 (Gencon).
Ülgener, M. Fehmi, “Bekleme Sürelerinin Başlangıcına Dair Bazı Hukuki Sorunlar”, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, C.16, S.2, Yıl.1991, s. 122 vd. (Bekleme Süreleri).
Vandeventer, Braden, “Admiralty Law Institute: Symposium on Charter Parties: Analysis of Basic Provisions of Voyage and Time Charter Parties”, Tulane Law Review, May, 1975, s. 806-845.
Weale, John, “The NYPE Off-Hire Clause and Third Party Intervention: Can an Efficient Vessel be Placed Off-Hire?”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 2002, s. 133-178.
Woo, Nicholas, “Comlying strictly with notice of vessel‟s readines”, New Straits Times Malaysia, 7 May, 2001. Wood, Michael, “Law (Legal Eye): Notice of readiness –not a „delayed action device‟, Lloyd‟s List, 7 December 1990.
------------ “Early loading triggers earlier laytime”, The Times London, 4 August, 2006.
------------ “Law Report: Bad weather no bar to notice of readiness”, The Times London, 20 May, 1987.
------------ “Law: Owners to bear expense of delay in loading at berth”, Lloyd‟s List, 8 july, 1994.
------------ “Law: Notice of readiness held valid –Casebook: Mavis D‟Souza, Barrister”, Lloyd‟s List 26 November, 1993.
------------ “Litigator's view; Imogen Rumbold on notices of readiness in shipping law. Imogen Rumbold is a partner at Lawrence Graham, The Lawyer, April 21, 1998, Section: Litigation:Analysis”; p. 14 (http://www.thelawyer.com/imogen-rumbold-on-notices-of-readiness-in-shipping-law-imogen-rumbold-is-a-partner-at-lawrence-graham/77851.article) (1.8.2011).
------------ “Ocean Pride wins $450,000 demurrage case”, Lloyd‟s List, 5 December, 2007.
----------- “Meaning of 'whether in berth or not'; Bulk Trans-port Group Shipping Co Ltd v Seacrystal Shipping Ltd (The Kyzikos); Law report”, The Times London, 24 October, 1988.
----------- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 27 June, 1990, Trade and Development Board Committee on Shipping Working Group on International Shipping Legislation Twelfth Session Geneva, 22 October, 1990, http://r0.unctad.org/ttl/docs-legal/Reports%20and%20Documents/Charter%20PartiesA%20Comparative %20Analysis.pdf [20.8.2011].
http://www.thelawyer.com/imogen-rumbold-on-notices-of-readiness-in shipping-law-imogen-rumbold-is-a-partner-at-lawrence graham/77851article [1.8.2011].
https://www.bimco.org/~/media/Documents/Document_Samples/Voyage_Charter_Parties/Sample_Copy_GRAINCON.ashx) [14.8.2011].
https://www.bimco.org/en/Chartering/BIMCO%20Clauses/Waiting_for_Berth_Clause.aspx. [15.8.2011].