Cinsiyetin Sosyal Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Bu meta-analizi çalışmasının amacı, cinsiyetin sosyal bağlılık üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Sistematik sentezleme ile gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada önce alanyazın taraması yapılmış ve 261 çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmalardan araştırmacılar tarafından belirlenen ölçütleri karşılayan 19 bağımsız çalışmaya ait 20 etki büyüklüğü meta-analize dâhil edilmiştir (N = 15.171; 8.620 kadın ve 6.551 erkek). Meta-analiz sonucunda cinsiyetin sosyal bağlılık üzerinde kadınlar lehine düşük düzeyde anlamlı olduğu anlaşılmıştır (k = 20, d = .13, p < .001). Moderatörlük analizi sonucunda; yaş gruplarına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık görülmezken, kültür açısından anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu saptanmıştır. Bireyci kültürlerde etki büyüklüğü düşük düzeyde ve anlamlı ancak kolektif kültürlerde etki büyüklüğünün oldukça düşük ve anlamsız olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, ilgili alan yazın ışığında tartışılmış ve gelecek çalışmalara önerilerde bulunulmuştur

Gender Differences in Social Connectedness: A Meta-Analysis Study

This meta-analysis was conducted to examine gender differences in social connectedness. Systematic review and meta-analysis was reached 261 studies by literature search. With regards to inclusion criteria, 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis and 20 effect sizes were calculated from these studies (N = 15.171; 8.620 females and 6.551 males). Meta-analysis indicated that there is a significant slightly effect in favors of women (k = 20, d = .13, p < .001). In moderator analysis revealed that age did not moderate significantly the relationships between gender and social connectedness, whereas cultural differences moderate the relationships between them. Effect size was significant but, it was just a small for individual culture, not for collective culture. The findings were discussed in the light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made for future studies

___

  • Abubakar, A., van de Vijver, F. J., Mazrui, L., Murugami, M., & Arasa, J. (2014). Connectedness and psychological well-being among adolescents of immigrant background in Kenya. In Global perspectives on well-being in immigrant families (pp. 95-111). Springer New York.
  • Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14.
  • Adler, A. (1927). Understanding Human Nature. New York: Garden City Publishing Company, Inc. *Alam, A., Rafique, R., & Anjum, A. (2016). Narcissistic tendencies, forgiveness and empathy as predictors of social connectedness in students from universities of Lahore. Dialogue, 11(2), 136-157.
  • Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291-322.
  • *Armstrong, S., & Oomen-Early, J. (2009). Social connectedness, self-esteem, and depression symptomatology among collegiate athletes versus nonathletes. Journal of American College Health, 57(5), 521-526.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
  • Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179–226.
  • *Betancourt, T. S., Salhi, C., Buka, S., Leaning, J., Dunn, G., & Earls, F. (2012). Connectedness, social support and internalising emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents displaced by the Chechen conflict. Disasters, 36(4), 635-655.
  • Blackshaw, T., & Long, J. (2005). What’s the big idea? A critical exploration of the concept of social capital and its incorporation into leisure policy discourse. Leisure Studies, 24(3), 239-258.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to MetaAnalysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Separation: Anxiety and Anger (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books.
  • Can, G. (1989). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrencilere Yönelik Tutumları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayını.
  • Can, G. (1998). İlköğretimde rehberlik. İçinde A. Hakan (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimlerinde Yenilikler (ss. 109-123). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açık Öğretim Fakültesi Yayınları, No 559.
  • Chen, L. J., & Chung, S. K. (2007). Loneliness, social connectedness, and family income among undergraduate females and males in Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(10), 1353-1364.
  • *Christiansen, E. J., & Evans, W. P. (2005). Adolescent victimization testing models of resiliency by gender. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(3), 298-316.
  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  • Collaborative, E. (2004). Exercise training meta-analysis of trials in patients with chronic heart failure (ExTraMATCH). BMJ, 328(7433), 189, 1-7. doi:10.1136/bmj.37938.645220.EE Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O., & Schumm, L. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73, 185–203.
  • Crespo, C., Kielpikowski, M., Jose, P. E., & Pryor, J. (2010). Relationships between family connectedness and body satisfaction: A longitudinal study of adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(12), 1392-1401.
  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5-37.
  • Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and metaanalysis. New York: Routledge.
  • *Czyz, E. K., Liu, Z., & King, C. A. (2012). Social connectedness and one-year trajectories among suicidal adolescents following psychiatric hospitalization. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41(2), 214-226.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Demirtaş-Madran, H. A. (2012). Buss-Perry Saldırganlık Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 23, 1-6.
  • Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D. I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 67-82.
  • *DiDonato, M. D., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2013). Predictors and consequences of gender typicality: The mediating role of communality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(3), 429-436.
  • Duru, E. (2008a). Uyum zorluklarını yordamada yalnızlık, sosyal destek ve sosyal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin analizi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8(3), 833-856.
  • Duru, E. (2008b). Üniversiteye uyum sürecinde yalnızlığı yordamada sosyal destek ve sosyal bağlılığın doğrudan ve dolaylı rolleri. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(29), 13-24.
  • Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1977). Childhood and Society. London: Paladin Grafton Books.
  • Giummarra, M. J., Haralambous, B., Moore, K., & Nankervis, J. (2007). The concept of health in older age: Views of older people and health professionals. Australian Health Review, 31, 642–650.
  • Glover, T. D., & Hemingway, J. L. (2005). Locating leisure in the social capital literature. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(4), 387.
  • Hall, C. S., Lindzey, G., & Campbell, J. B. (1998). Theories of Personality. New York: John Wiley. *Hawkley, L. C., Gu, Y., Luo, Y. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). The mental representation of social connections: generalizability extended to Beijing adults. PloS one, 7(9), e44065.
  • Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj, 327(7414), 557-560.
  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). , Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2011). Social Psychology (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. Jose, P. E., & Lim, B. T. L. (2014). Social connectedness predicts lower loneliness and depressive symptoms over time in adolescents. Open Journal of Depression, 3, 154-163.
  • *Kaminski, J. W., Puddy, R. W., Hall, D. M., Cashman, S. Y., Crosby, A. E., & Ortega, L. A. (2010). The relative influence of different domains of social connectedness on self-directed violence in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(5), 460-473.
  • Karcher, M. J. (2016). The Hemingway: Measure of adolescent connectedness. 26.092016 tarihinde http://adolescentconnectedness.com/ adresinden alınmıştır.
  • *Krishnakumar, A., Narine, L., Soonthorndhada, A., & Thianlai, K. (2014). Family Stressors, Home Demands and Responsibilities, Coping Resources, Social Connectedness, and Thai Older Adult Health Problems Examining Gender Variations. Journal of Aging and Health, 27(2) 257–283.
  • *Kurtyılmaz, Y. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkisel saldırganlık ile benlik saygısı, sosyal bağlılık ve sosyal kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance Scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232-241.
  • Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338-345.
  • *Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (2000). Understanding social connectedness in college women and men. Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD, 78(4), 484.
  • *Lee, R. M., Keough, K. A., & Sexton, J. D. (2002). Social connectedness, social appraisal, and perceived stress in college women and men. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(3), 355-361.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Applied social research methods series; Vol. 49. Practical meta-analysis. SAGE Publications.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motıvation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
  • McWhirter, B.T. (1990). Loneliness: A review of current literature, with implications for counseling and research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 589-595.
  • *Mondisa, J. L., & McComb, S. A. (2014, January). Social Community: Understanding Students' Connectedness to Promote Student Success. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 920). Institute of Industrial Engineers-Publisher.
  • *Moore, TL (2006). Social connectedness and social support of doctoral students in counselor education. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Idaho State University, Pocatello.
  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
  • *Rew, L., Arheart, K. L., Johnson, K., & Spoden, M. (2015). Changes in Ethnic Identity and Competence in Middle Adolescents. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 26(3), 227-233.
  • Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67(2), 162-167.
  • Salimi, A. (2011). Social-emotional loneliness and life satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 292-295.
  • *Satıcı, S. A. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin affetme, intikam, sosyal bağlılık ve öznel iyi oluşları: Farklı yapısal modellerin denenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • *Satıcı, S. A., Uysal, R., & Deniz, M. E. (2016). Linking social connectedness to loneliness: The mediating role of subjective happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 306-310.
  • Schultz, N. R., & Moore, D. (1986). The loneliness experience of college students: Sex differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 111-119.
  • Sterne, J. A., Sutton, A.J., Ioannidis, J. P., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., … Moher, D., & Higgins, J. P. (2011).
  • Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in metaanalyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 343. d4002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4002
  • Thomson, R., & Murachver, T. (2001). Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 193-208.
  • Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: how could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people?. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 355-372.
  • Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of social psychology, 145(6), 673-685.
  • Townsend, K. C., & McWhirter, B. T. (2005). Connectedness: A review of the literature with implications for counseling, assessment, and research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(2), 191-201.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & Collectivism. Boulder, CO, US: Westview Press. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism‐collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924.
  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.
  • Üstün, U., & Eryılmaz, A. (2014). Etkili araştırma sentezleri yapabilmek için bir araştırma yöntemi: Meta-analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174), 1-32.
  • Wu, Y. J., Outley, C., Matarrita-Cascante, D., & Murphrey, T. P. (2016). A Systematic review of recent research on adolescent social connectedness and mental health with internet technology use. Adolescent Research Review, 1(2), 153-162.
  • *Yıldırım, S. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik başarı, akademik erteleme, kopya çekme ve devamsızlık durumlarının yordayıcısı olarak sosyal bağlılık. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gaziosman Paşa Üniversitesi, Tokat.
Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1999
  • Yayıncı: Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi