___

• Abrutyn, S. and Turner, J. H.(2011). The old institutionalism meets the new institutionalism. Sociological Perspectives, 54(3), 283–306. doi:10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.283
• Aldrich, H. and Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review 19(4), 645–670.
• Aytemiz Seymen, . (2014). Koşul bağımlılık kuramı kapsamında örgüt büyüklüğü-örgüt yapısı ilişkisinin yazınsal açıdan eleştirel bir değerlendirmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (2) , 135-165 . DOI: 10.24889/ifede.268173
• Battilana, J. and Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, pp. 1419–1440.
• Berger, P. and Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York:Doubleday. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710424
• Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review. 36. 151-179, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
• Boxenbaum, E. and Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling, in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (ed. R. Greenwood,C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby), SAGE, London, pp. 78– 98.
• Broom, L. and Selznick, P. (1955). Sociology: a text with adapted readings. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson
• Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 6486.00083
• Chimezie A. B. and Osigweh, Y. (1989). Concept fallibility in organizational science. The Academy of Management Review,14(4), 579-594. Retrieved May 29, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/258560, http://doi.org/10.2307/258560
• Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology: toward an explanatory science. Academic Press.
• Croucher, G and Woelert, P. (2018). Institutional isomorphism. In Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (2nd Ed). Wiley Black Publishing. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1127
• Çakar, M. and Danışman A. (2012). Örgüt kuramları: kurumsal kuram (Ed: C. Sözen, . Basım). İstanbul: Beta. s.241-271.
• Deephouse, D. and Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. GreenwoodC. Oliver and R. Suddaby The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). London: SAGE Publications Ltd., http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n2
• Della Fave, L. R. (1986). Toward an explanation of the legitimation process. Soc. Forc. 65:476-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/65.2.476
• D ez-Mart n, F., Prado-Roman, C., and Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.
• DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell and P.
• J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pp. 1-40.
• DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160., https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
• Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational complexity, International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, M. Warner (ed.), London: Thompson Learning, p. 5013- 5022.
• Dornbusch, S. D. and Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review. 18: 122-136, https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
• Elbardan H., Kholeif A.O. (2017). The legitimacy of internal auditing practice. In: Enterprise Resource Planning, Corporate Governance and Internal Auditing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
• Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. W. W. Powell ve P. J. DiMaggio (Ed.). The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (232–266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Galliers, R.D. and Currie, W. (2011). The Oxford handbook of management information systems: critical perspectives and new directions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Gall.
• Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4),603-625. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310825
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. and Sahlin, K. (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational ınstitutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781849200387
• Greenwood, R.; Raynard, M.;Kodeih, F.;Micelotta, E., and Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. In J. P. Walsh and A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management annals, vol. 5. Essex, UK: Routledge.
• Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press. Hatch, M. J., and Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory (3. ed. ed.). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
• Hybels, R. C. (1995). On legitimacy, legitimation and organizations: a critical review and integrative theoretical model. Academy of Management Journal (Special Volume), 241–256, https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1995.17536509
• Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 143–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Johansson, A.C. and Sell, J. (2004). Sources of legitimation and their effects on group routines: a theoretical analysis. Pp. 89–116 in Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Legitimacy Processes in Organizations, edited by C. Johnson. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
• Johnson, C. (2004). Introduction:legitimacy processes in organizations, Johnson, C. (Ed.) Legitimacy Processes in Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(04)22010-9
• Johnson, C.; Dowd, T. J., and Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 53–78, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101
• Kalemci A. and Kalemci Tüzün İ. (2008). Örgütsel alanda meşruiyet kavramının açılımı: kurumsal ve stratejik meşruiyet. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2):403-413.
• Kang, K. H. and Lee, S. (2014). The moderating role of brand diversification on the relationship between geographic diversification and firm performance in the us lodging industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 38, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.01.001
• Kauffman, S., Keskinen, A., Aaltonen, M., Kaufmann, S., and Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Organisational complexity foreword. Keskin, H. Akgün, A. E. and Koçoğlu, İ. (2016). Örgüt Teorisi, Nobel.
• Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64–81., https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1580441
• Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, I. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1-47.
• Lenski, G. (1966). Power and Privilege. McGraw-Hill.
• Massey, J.E. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: communication strategies for organizations in crisis. The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 153-183.
• Maurer, J.G. (1971). Readings in organization theory: open-system approaches. New York Random House.
• Mazza, C. (1999). Claim, intent, and persuasion: organizational legitimacy and the rhetoric of corporate mission statements. Boston: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5061-7
• McAuley, J., Johnson, P. and Duberley, J. (2007). Organization theory: challenges and perspectives. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education
• Meyer, J. W. and Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments. ritual and Rationality. BeverlyHills: Sage., https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050030417
• Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. Retrieved February 13, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/2778293
• Mintzberg, H., Waters, J.A., (1982). Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm. Academy of Management Journal 25 (3), 465–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/256075
• Murtha, T., and Lenway, S. (1994). Country capabilities and the strategic state: how national political institutions affect multinational corporations' strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 113-129. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/2486879
• Ossewaarde, R., Nijhof, A., and Heyse, L. (2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: how organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.472
• Pache, A.C. and Santos, F. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing ınstitutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, pp. 972–1001.
• Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations-i. Administrative Science Quarterly,1(1), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390840
• Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL. Free Press.
• Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
• Pillay,S., Reddy, P. S. and Morgan, D. (2016). Institutional isomorphism and whistle-blowing intentions in public sector institutions. Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1178322
• Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds.) (1991). The new ınstitutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Powell, W.W. (1988). Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance. In L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, pp.115–36. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
• Ruef, M., and Scott, W.R.(1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (4): 877–904., https://doi.org/10.2307/2393619
• Rutherford, M. (1995). The old and the new institutionalism: can bridges be built? Journal of Economic Issues, 29(2), 443-451. Retrieved May 30, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/4226959
• Scott, R.W. (1995/2001/2014). Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Scott, R.W. (2003). Organizations rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, N.J Prentice Hall
• Scott, W. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30. 1-21. 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644.
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism ‗old‘ and ‗new.‘ Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 270–277.
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Singh, J.;Tucker, D. and House, R. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171-193. doi:10.2307/2392787
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 571- 610., https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
• Suddaby, Roy, Alex Bitektine and Patrick Haack. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals 11: 451–78, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
• Sundaram, A. K., and Black, J. S. (1992). The environment and internal organization of multinational enterprises. Academy of Management Beview, 17: 729-757. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279065 Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hil
• Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory [Electronic version]. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175-190). London: SAGE.
• Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L.G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly 28:22–39.
• Tost, L. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0227
• Walker, H. (2004). Beyond power and domination: legitimacy and formal organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 22. 239-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(04)22008-0
• Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. G. Roth and C. Wittich (Eds). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Wright, E. O. (1985). Practical strategies for transforming concepts. In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Classes: 292-302. London, UK: Verso.
• Yüncü, V. and Fidan,Ü. (2019). Integrating organizational reputation mechanism to decision-making processes: the facebook case. Journal of Administrative Sciences Cilt/Volume 17, Sayı/ : 34 ss.pp.: 301-322. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.425271
• Yüncü,V. and Koparal, C. (2017). Fundamental paradigms for corporate reputation. "Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 60-65.
• Zelditch, M. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In: J. Jost and B. Major (Eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zimmerman, M. A., and Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414.
• Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464. Retrieved May 30, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/2083256