Liberal demokratik barış kuramı: Eleştirel bir değerlendirme

Liberal Demokratik Barış Kuramı, demokratik devletlerin birbirlerine karşı savaşmayacakları tezini ileri sürmektedir. Bu tez, demokratik egemenlik biçiminin doğası gereği barışçıl olduğukabulü ile temellendirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada söz konusu iddialar ele alınıp irdelenmiş; ileri sürülenbu iddiaların geçerli olup olmadığı tartışılmıştır. Liberal Demokratik Barış Kuramı, Uluslararasıİlişkiler disiplininde önemli kuramsal katkılardan biri olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çalışmadaöncelikle kuramın gelişimi, pratik sonuçları ele alınacak ve daha sonra yeni kuramsal katkı vemodeller tartışılacaktır. Bu şekilde kuramın güçlü ve zayıf tarafları tespit edilmeye ve demokratikbarış kuramının Uluslararası İlişkiler teorisi açısından önemi belirlenmeye çalışılacaktır. Çalışma, sonuç bölümünde genel bir değerlendirme yapılarak tamamlanacaktır

Liberal democratic peace theory: A critical reappraisal

Liberal Democratic Peace Theory asserts the argument that democratic states do not make awar upon each other. This argument grounded on the theory that claims democratic structure ofpolitical system helps to establish a peaceful foreign policy. Hence, it can be said that democraticstates do not wage war, unless they are attacked or provoked by none-democratic or authoritarian states. This paper contents the democratic peace theory with its basic components and proposals,and then discusses whether this theory provides us a better explanatory frame work for understanding its complexity of international relations. Although this theory is well known among theAmerican scholars, in Turkey, there are not sufficient studies explaining this approach. In thiscontext, it is the aim of this study to make a proper contribution in clarifying the vague in the areastudied

PDF

___

BABST, Dean V.; (1964), Elective Governments - A Force for Peace, The Wisconsin Sociologist, 3(1), pp. 9-14.
CHOJNACKİ, Sven; (2003), Demokratien und Krieg: Das Konfliktverhalten demokratischer Staaten, 1946-2001, WZB Discussion Papers P 2003-304, Internet Address: http://www.bundesstiftungfriedensforschung.de/ index.php/component/content/article/17-detailsfoerderprofil/65-eberwein, Date of Access: 03. 03. 2013.
CHOJNACKİ, Sven; (2003a), Schnelle Siege bei geringen Kosten? Demokratien und Kriege, WZB-Mitteilungen Heft, 100, ss. 18-22.
DAASE, Christopher; (2004), Demokratischer Frieden - Demokratischer Krieg. Drei Gründe für die Unfriedlichkeit von Demokratien, in Björn
AUST und Peter SCHLOTTER (Hg), Demokratien im Krieg, Christine Schweitzer, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verl.-Ges, ss. 53-71.
DALACOURA, Katerina; (2005), US Democracy Promotion in The Arab Middle East Since 11 September 2001: A Critique, International Affairs, 81 (5), pp. 963-79.
ERALP, Atilla; (2006), Devlet ve Ötesi: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Kavramlar, Birinci Baskı, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
GEIS, Anna; (2001), Diagnose: Doppelbefund - Ursache ungeklärt? Die Kontroverse um den demokratischen Frieden, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42 (2), ss. 282-298.
HASENCLEVER, Andreas; (2002), The Democratic Peace Meets International Institutions.Überlegungen zur internationalen Organisation des demokratischen Friedens, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 9(1), ss. 75-112.
HASENCLEVER, Andreas; (2003), Liberale Ansätze zum demokratischen Frieden, in Siegfried SCHIEDER und Manuela SPINDLER (Hg.), Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen, Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich UTB, ss. 199-225.
HERMANN, Margaret G. and Charles KEGLEY Jr.; (1995), Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology, International Studies Quarterly, 39(4), pp. 511- 533.
KAHL, Colin; (1998-99), Constructing a Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity and Democratic Peace, Security Studies 8(2/3), pp. 94-144.
KANT, Immanuel; (1984), Zum Ewigen Frieden, Stuttgart: Reclam Verlag.
KEGLEY, Charles W. and Margaret G. HERMANN;(1995), The Political Psychology of Peace through Democratization, Cooperation and Conflict, 30(1), pp. 5 - 30.
KİELMANNSEGG, Peter Graf; (2004, 22 Dezember), Drei Regeln für den Frieden, Politik Essay, Die Zeit, 53, s. 3.
KRAUSE, Joachim (2003), Vom ewigen Frieden zum demokratischen Frieden? Die Aussagekraft von Theorien des demokratischen Friedens, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 13(2), ss. 693-716.
LAYNE, Christopher; (1994), Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace, International Security, 19 (2), pp. 5 - 49.
LEVY, Jack; (1988), Domestic Politics and War, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18, pp. 653673.
MANSFIELD, Edward D. and Jack SNYDER; (1995), Democratization and the Danger of War, International Security, 1, pp. 5-38.
NAVARİ, Cornelia; (2011),The English School and the Emerging Democracy Norm in International Society, WISC Third International Conference, 17-20 August, Porto, Portugal: World International Studies Committee, pp. 1-12, Internet Address: http://www.wiscnetwork.org/ report_on_porto.php, Date of Access: 05.03.2013.
ONEAL, John R. and Bruce RUSSETT; (1999), The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885 1992, World Politics. A Quarterly Journal of International Relations, 52 (1), pp. 1-37.
OREN, Ido; (1995), The Subjectivity of the Democratic Peace. Changing U.S. Perceptions of Imperial Germany, International Security, 20(2), pp. 147-184.
OWEN, John M.; (1994), How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace, International Security, 19 (2), pp. 87-125.
ÖZCAN, Ufuk; (1997), Wilson Prensipleri Üzerine, İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 4, ss. 37-48.
PECENY, Mark; (1997), A Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Peace: The Ambiguous Case of the Spanish-American War, Journal of Peace Research, 34 (4), pp. 415 - 430.
QUACKENBUSH, Stephen L. and Michael RUDY; (2006), Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace, Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 20-23 April, Chicago-Illinois: Midwest Political Science Association, pp. 1-33, Internet Address: http://www.mpsanet.org/ Conference/ConferenceSections/ WorkingGroups/ tabid/794/Default.aspx, Date of Access: 05.03.2013.
RAUCH, Carsten; (2005), Die Theorie des Demokratischen Friedens. Grenzen und Perspektiven, Erste Auflage, Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag Gmbh.
RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas; (1995), Democratic Peace Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument, European Journal of International Relations, 1(4), pp. 491-517.
ROBINSON, William I.; (1996), Globalization, The World System, and Democracy Promotion, Theory and Society, 25 (5), pp. 615-665.
ROSATO, Sebastian; (2003), The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory, American Political Science Review, 97 (4), pp. 585 602.
ROUSSEAU, David, L. Christopher GELPİ, Dan REITER and Paul K. HUTH; (1996), Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918- 88, The American Political Science Review, 90(3), pp. 512-533.
RUMMEL, Rudolph J.; (1975-1981), Understanding Confl ict and War, Vol. 1 5, New York: Sage Publications.
RUMMEL, Rudolph J.; (1983), Libertarianism and International Violence, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, pp. 27-71.
RUSSETT, Bruce; (1993), Grasping the Democratic Peace -Principles for a Post-Cold War World, First Edition, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
SCHEEL, Constanze; (2007), Die liberale Theorie des Demokratischen Friedens Frieden durch weltweite Demokratisierung?, Sicherheit und Frieden, 25(4), ss. 208-213.
SCHRADER, Lutz; (2003), Frieden und Demokratie, Erste Auflage, Hagen: Fernuniversität Gesamthochschule.
SINGER, J. David and Melvin SMALL; (1972), The Wages of War, 1816- 1965: A Statistical Handbook, First Edition, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
SMALL, Melvin and J. David SİNGER; (1976), The War Proneness of Democratic Regimes, Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 4, pp. 50-69.
SPIRO, David E.; (1994), The Insignificance of the Liberal Peace, International Security, 19 (2), pp. 50 86.
TEUSCH, Ulrich und Martin KAHL; (2001), Ein Theorem mit Verfallsdatum? Der Demokratische Frieden im Kontext der Globalisierung, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2, ss. 287-320.
THRONTVEİT, Trygve; (2010), Wilson, Past and Present, Democracy Journal, 16, pp. 99-106.
WRIGHT, Quincy; (1942), A Study of War, First Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
YALVAÇ, Faruk; (2006), "Savaş ve Barış", iç Atila ERALP (Ed.), Devlet ve Ötesi: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Kavramlar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, ss. 251-285.