Bulanık AHP ile belediyelerin toplu taşıma araç seçimi

Sosyal, çevresel, yapısal, politik v.b. soyut faktörlerin olduğu ve kısıtlı bütçenin en iyi şekilde kullanılmasının zorunlu olduğu kamu hizmet sektöründe ihtiyaca göre seçim yapılmasıproblemiyle sık sık karşılaşılır. Çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinden, Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi(AHP), birden çok kriter içeren bu tür problemlerin çözümünde kullanılan bir karar verme yöntemidir. Bu çalışmada belediyelerin toplu taşıma araç seçim problemi ele alınarak ikili karşılaştırmayargılarındaki sözel belirsizliği daha iyi ifade etmek amacıyla Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesitekniklerinden biri olan Changin Mertebe Analiz Yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulanık sayıları sıralamak için ise Kareli Ortalama ve Kwong-Bai yöntemi kullanılarak alternatifler arasında sıralamayapılmıştır

Municipalities public transport vehicle selection using fuzzy AHP

Social, environmental, structural, political etc. intangible factors, and the best way is theuse of a limited budget is necessary to choose according to need with the problem of public sectorservices are often encountered. Multi-criteria decision-making techniques, Analytical HierarchyProcess (AHP), is used to solve these kinds of problems with multiple criteria decision-makingmethod. In this study, by considering the problem of selection of the municipalities of publictransport vehicles, in order to state accurately the linguistic uncertainty in the pairwise comparison judgments of the alternatives, the Chang s Extent Analysis Method which is one of the FuzzyAnalytic Hierarchy Process techniques, has been used as a prioritization method. Ranking amongalternatives is made by using Quadratic Mean and the Kwong-Bai technique to rank fuzzy numbers.

___

  • ABDEL-KADER, Magdy and David DUGDALE; (2001), “Evaluating Investments in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Fuzzy set Theory Approach.” British Accounding Rewiev, 33, pp. 455-489.
  • ARSLAN, Turan and Jotin KHIRSTY; (2006), “A Rational Approach to Handling Fuzzy Perceptions in Route Choice”, Europen Journal of Operational Research, 168(29), pp. 571-583.
  • BAAS, Sejoerd M. and Huibert KWAKERNAAK; (1977), “Rating and Ranking of Multiple Aspect Alternatives Using Fuzzy Sets”, Automatica, 13, pp. 47-58.
  • BAŞKAYA, Zehra; (2011), Bulanık Doğrusal Programlama, Birinci Baskı, Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi.
  • BAYKAL, Nazife ve Timur BEYAN; (2004), Bulanık Mantık İlke Ve Temelleri, Birinci Baskı, Ankara: Bıçaklar Kitabevi.
  • BORTOLAN, Giovanni and Rossana DEGANI; (1985), “A Review of Some Methods for Ranking Fuzzy Numbers”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, pp. 1-19.
  • BUCKLEY, James J.; (1985), "Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), pp. 233-247.
  • CHANG, Da-Yong; (1996), “Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), pp. 649-655.
  • CHEN, Shu-Jen; Ching-Lai HWANG and Frank P. HWANG; (1992), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, First Edition, Berlin- Verlag: Springer.
  • CHE, ZhengHua; HerShing WANG and Chih-Ling CHUANG; (2010), “A Fuzzy AHP and DEA Approach for Making Bank Loan Decisions For Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), pp. 7189-7199.
  • CHOOBINEH, Fred and Li HUISHEN; (1993), " An Index for Ordering Fuzzy Numbers", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 54(3), pp. 287-294.
  • ERTUĞRUL, İrfan; (2007), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Bir Tekstil İşletmesinde Makine Seçim Problemine Uygulanması”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 25(1), ss. 171-192.
  • EZZATI, Rosli; Tofigh ALLAHVIRANLOO; Solmaz KHEZERLOO and Mesiam KHEZERLOO; (2012), “An Approach for Ranking of Fuzzy Numbers”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, pp. 690-695.
  • GASIMOV, Rafail N.; (2004), Karar Analizi, Osman Gazi Üniversitesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Ders Notları.
  • GÖKSU, Ali ve İbrahim GÜNGÖR; (2008), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşik Proses ve Üniversite Tercih Sıralamasında Uygulanması” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi,13(3), ss. 1-26.
  • GÜNDEN, Cihat ve Bülent MİRAN; (2008), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Kullanarak Çiftçi Kararlarının Analizi”, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(3), ss. 195-204.
  • GÜNGÖR, İbrahim ve İŞLER Büyüker Didar; (2005), “Analitik Hiyerarşik Yaklaşım İle Otomobil Seçimi”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), ss. 21-33.
  • HASGÜL, Servet; (2010), "Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci", Karar Verme Ders Notları, İnternet Adresi, “http://rd.spring.com/article/10.1007/s19845- 011-0560-2#.” Erişim Tarihi:16.07.2012.
  • IBRAHIM, Ahmed and Bilal M. AYYUB; (1992), “Multi-Criteria Ranking of Components According to Their Priority for Inspection”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 48, pp. 1-14.
  • JAIN, Ramesh; (1976), “Decision Making in the Presence of Fuzzy Variable”, IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernet SMC, 6, pp. 698-703.
  • KAPTANOĞLU, Dilek ve Ahmet Fahri ÖZOK; (2006), “Akademik Performans Değerlendirilmesi İçin Bir Bulanık Model” İTÜ Dergisi/d Mü- hendislik, 5(1), ss. 193-204.
  • KRISHNENDU, Shaw; Shankar RAVİ; S. Yadav SURENDRA and S. Thakurr
  • LAKSHMAN; (2012), “Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Multi-Objective Linear Programming for Developing low Carbon Supply Chain”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), pp. 8182-8192.
  • KWONG, C.K. and Hoglei BAI; (2003), “Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach” IEE Transactions, 35(7), pp. 619-626.
  • LAARHOVEN, Van P.M.J. and Witold PEDRYCZ; (19839, "A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(11), pp. 229-241.
  • LEE, Seong Kon; Gento MOGI; Zhuolin LI; K.S. HUI; Sang Kon LEE; K.N.
  • HUI; Sang Yong PARK; Young Jin HA and Jong Wook KIM; (2010), “Econometric Analysis of the R&D Performance in the National Hygrogen Energy Technology Development for Measuring Relative Efficiency: The fuzzy AHP/DEA Integrated Model Approach”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(6), pp. 2236-2246
  • LIN, Hsiu-Fen; (2010), “An Application of Fuzzy AHP for Evaluating EourseWebsite Quality”, Computers & Education, 54(4), pp. 877-888.
  • LIOU, Tian-Shy and Mao-Juin J. WANG; (1992), “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Integral Value” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), pp. 247-255.
  • ORLANDO, Duran; (2011), “Computer-aided Maintenance Management Systems Selection Based on a Fuzzy AHP Approach” Advances in Engineering Software, 42(10), pp. 821-829.
  • ÖZKAN, M. Mustafa; (2003), Bulanık Hedef Programlama, Birinci Baskı, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi.
  • PAKSOY, Turan; Nimet Yapıcı PEHLİVAN, ve Cengiz KAHRAMAN; (2012), “Organizational Strategy Development in Distribution Channel Management using Fuzzy AHP and Hierarchical Fuzzy TOPSİS”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), pp. 2822-2841.
  • SAATY, Thomas L. and G. Luis VARGAS; (2001), Model, Methods,Concepts& Applications of The Analytic Hierarcy Process, First Edition, Denmark: Kluwer’s International Series.
  • SAATY, Thomas L. and Luis G. VARGAS; (2001), Model, Methods,Concepts& Applications of The Analytic Hierarcy Process, First Edition, Denmark: Kluwer’s International Series.
  • TAHA, Zahari and Sarkawt ROSTAM; (2011), “A Hibrid Fuzzy AHPPROMETHEE Decision Support System for Machine Tool Selection in Flexible Manufacturing cell.”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), pp. 2137-3149, Internet Address, (http://rd.springer.com- /article/10.1007/s10845-011-0560-2#). Date of Access: 07.08.2012
  • TOKSARI, Murat and M. Duran TOKSARI; (2003), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerar- şi Prosesi (AHP) Yaklaşımı Kullanılarak Hedef Pazarların Belirlenmesi”,
  • ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 38, ss. 51-57.
  • UZOKA, Faith Michael Emeka; Okure OBOT; Ken BARKER and Joseph
  • OSUJI; (2011), “An Experimental Comparison of Fuzzy Logic and AHP for Medical Decision Support Systems”, Computer Methods and Programs Biomedicine,103(1), pp. 10-27.
  • VARGAS, G.Luis; (1990), “An Overview of The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp. 2-8.
  • YALÇIN, Seçme N. ve Ali İhsan ÖZDEMİR; (2008), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ile Çok Kriterli Stratejik Tedarikçi Seçimi: Türkiye Örne- ği” Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), ss. 175-190.
  • ZADEH, Lotfi A. (1965), “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control, 8, pp. 338- 353.