EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL AND MENTAL FATIGUE IN AN ASSEMBLY LINE

This study focuses on operator-based ergonomics analysis of the work performed in different stations. This study was carried out at a car seat production assembly line in automotive industry. The workloads of the employees cannot be uniform ergonomically, however the same relaxation allowance was given for all types of work. The relaxation allowance is 6% at MTM (Methods Time Measurement). In this study, fatigue rate is studied under two headings as physical and mental, contrary to the usual physical fatigue only approach. Body moves for lower arm, upper arm, wrist, neck, legs are analysed with MURI and REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) Mental demand, physical demand, effort, performance, temporal demand and frustration were studied with NASA-TLX (NASA Task Load Index) to assess mental fatigue. Physical and mental fatigue were calculated with weights using the AHP method. New resting time coefficients were calculated for each different working type.

___

  • Ayan, B. (2015). Montaj Hattında Ergonomik Risk Unsurlarının İncelenmesi: Otomotiv Sektörüne Yönelik Bir Uygulama [Ergonomic Risk Factors Investigation in Assembly Line: An Application in the Automotive Industry]. Ankara: Ministry of Labour and Social Security, Centre for Labour and Social Security Training and Research. Retrieved from https://www.ailevecalisma.gov.tr/media/3222/montaj_dosya-39-6335.pdf
  • Babalık, F.C. (2016). Ergonomics for engineers, Bursa: Dora Publishing.
  • Becker, A. B., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Hancock, P. A. (1995). Effects of jet engine noise and performance feedback on perceived workload in a monitoring task. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0501_4
  • Delice, E. K. (2016). Acil servis hekimlerinin NASA-RTLX yöntemi ile zihinsel iş yüklerinin değelendirilmesi: Bir uygulama çalışması [Evaluation of emergency service doctors’ mental workload through NASA-RTLX method: An application study]. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 30(3).
  • Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P. & Marras, W. S. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55(4), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
  • Ekinci, E.B.M., & Can, G.F. (2018). Algılanan iş yükü ve çalışma duruşları dikkate alınarak operatörlerin ergonomik risk düzeylerinin çok kriterli karar verme yaklaşımı ile değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of workers’ ergonomic risk levels considering working postures and perceived workload with multi-criteria decision making approach]. Ergonomi, 1(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.478732
  • Felekoglu, B. & Tasan, S.O. (2017). Ergonomic risk assessment for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic reactive / proactive integrated approach. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32(3), 777-793. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.337625
  • Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
  • Hignett,S. (1998). Ergonomics. In J. Pitt-Brooke, H. Reid, J. Lockwood, K. Kerr (Ed.), Rehabilitation of Movement. Theoretical Basis of Clinical Practice (480-486). London: W.B Saunders Company.
  • Lee, Y. H. & Liu, B. S. (2003). Inflight workload assessment: Comparison of subjective and physiological measurements. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 74(10), 1078-1084.
  • Matthews, R., Legg, S. & Charlton, S. (2003). The effect of cell phone type on drivers subjective workload during concurrent driving and conversing, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(4), 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00023-4
  • McAtamney, L. & Hignett, S. (1995). REBA: A rapid entire body assessment method for investigating work related musculoskeletal disorders. Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society of Australia, 45-51, Adelaide.
  • Niebel, Benjamin W. & Freivalds, A. (2003). Methods standards and work design. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ohno, T. (1998). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Portland, OR, USA: Productivity Press.
  • Saaty T.L. (1988). What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process? In: G. Mitra, H. J. Greenberg, F.A. Lootsma, M. J. Rijkaert, H. J. Zimmermann (Ed.) Mathematical Models for Decision Support. Berlin, Heidelberg: NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5
  • Tubbs-Cooley, H.L., Mara, C.A., Carle, A.C., & Gurses, A. (2018). The NASA Task Load Index as a measure of overall workload among neonatal, paediatric and adult intensive care nurses. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 46, 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2018.01.004
  • Xu, Z., Ko, J., Cochran, D. J., & Jung, M. C. (2012). Design of assembly lines with the concurrent consideration of productivity and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders using linear models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(2), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.008
Endüstri Mühendisliği-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3410
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1989
  • Yayıncı: TMMOB MAKİNA MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

BLOKZİNCİR TEKNOLOJİSİ İLE MERKEZİ VE DAĞITIK VERİ TABANININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Selma YAPICI, Nursena ORAL, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN

YEDEK PARÇA ENVANTER MALİYETİNİ DÜŞÜRMEK İÇİN TAHMİN YÖNTEMLERİNİN BİR ŞİRKETTE UYGULANMASI

Alper Sadık TAVUKÇU, Bahar SENNAROGLU

YALIN DÖNÜŞÜMÜN MUHASEBE FONKSİYONLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ: BİR ÖRNEK ÇALIŞMA

Ülfet AYDEMİR, Müberra Gül SOLAK, Oğuz ÖZKAVUKCU, Mehmet Bülent DURMUŞOĞLU

MAKİNE ÖĞRENME ALGORİTMALARI İLE BİR TELEKOMUNİKASYON ŞİRKETİNDE MÜŞTERİ KAYIP TAHMİNİ ANALİZİ

Zeynep UYAR ERDEM, Banu ÇALIŞ, Seniye Ümit FIRAT

EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL AND MENTAL FATIGUE IN AN ASSEMBLY LINE

Aslı KAHYA, Ayça RECAL, Yasemin SEVİNCER, Tülin GÜNDÜZ, Seda ÖZMUTLU

İŞ BULMA SÜRECİNDE MÜHENDİSLİK DALLARININ PROMETHEE YÖNTEMİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Eda BALKAYA, Selen AVCI, Zerrin ALADAĞ

TÜRKİYE’DE İLLERİN DEPREM HASAR GÖREBİLİRLİK SIRALAMASINDA ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME TEKNİKLERİNİN BAŞARISININ COPELAND YÖNTEMİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ezgi GÜLER, Selen AVCI, Zerrin ALADAĞ

YALIN DÖNÜŞÜM MUHASEBE BÖLÜMÜNÜ NASIL ETKİLER: BİR ÖRNEK UYGULAMA

Ülfet AYDEMİR, Müberra SOLAK, Oğuz ÖZKAVUKCU, Mehmet Bülent DURMUŞOĞLU

TÜRKİYE’DE İLLERİN DEPREM HASAR GÖREBİLİRLİK SIRALAMASINDA PROMETHEE, VIKOR, TOPSIS YÖNTEMLERİNİN BAŞARILARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ezgi GÜLER, Selen AVCI, Zerrin ALADAĞ

BİR MONTAJ HATTINDA FİZİKSEL VE MENTAL YORGUNLUĞUN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Aslı KAHYA, Ayça RECAL, Yasemin SEVİNCER, Tülin GÜNDÜZ, Seda ÖZMUTLU