Üniversite Öğrencileri Arasında Yüksek ve Düşük İstatitik Kaygısının Ayrıştırıcıları

Bu çalışmada, istatistik derslerinde öğrenciler üzerinde gözlemlenen istatistik kaygısının bilişsel olmayan faktörlerinin yüksek ve düşük kaygılı öğrencileri ayırt etmesi amacıyla Ayrıştırıcı Fonksiyonlar Analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nin Texas Eyaleti'nde bir devlet üniversitesinde istatistiğe giriş dersini almakta olan 246 lisans ve yüksek lisans öğrencisi oluşturmuştur. Öğrenciler istatistik Kaygısı Derecelendirme Ölçeği ve istatistiğe Karşı Tutumlar Ölçeği'ni yanıtlamışlar ve ayrıca geçmiş matematik tecrübelerini, kendilerinin istatistik yeteneklerini ve aldıktan istatistik dersindeki doyum düzeylerini öznel olarak derecelendirmişlerdir. Araştırma bulguları ayrıştırıcı modelin gruplar arası varyansın % 63'ünü açıkladığını ve modelin % 88 genel doğruluk düzeyinde olduğunu göstermiştir

Discriminants of the Low-and-High Statistics Anxiety Among College Students

Discriminant function analysis was used to determine important non-cognitive factors that differentiated between low-and-high anxiety students in statistics. The participants were 246 college students enrolled ion introductory statistics courses at a state university in Texas. Students responded to two scales: the Statistical Anxiety Rating Scale and Attitudes Toward Statistics. They also indicated their previous mathematics experiences, perceived statistical abilities, and satisfaction with their current statistics course. Findings showed that the discriminant model accounted for 63% of the between-group variance and discriminated with 88% overall accuracy. Perceived statistical ability was the most influential variable that separated the groups.

___

  • Auzmendi, E. (1991, April). Factors related to attitudes toward statistics: A study with a Spanish sample. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED333049)
  • Baloğlu, M. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 855-865.
  • Baloğlu, M. (2002). Psychometric properties of the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 90, 315-325.
  • Baloğlu, M. (2001). An application of structural equation modeling techniques in the prediction of statistics anxiety among college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University-Commerce.
  • Blalock, H. M. (1987). Some general goals in teaching statistics. Teaching Sociology, 15, 164-172.
  • Connor-Greene, P. A. (1993). From the laboratory to the headlines: Teaching critical evaluation of press reports of research. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 167-169.
  • Cruise, R. J., Cash, R. W. & Bolton, D. L. (1985, August). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association Statistics Education Section. Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • Feinberg, L. B., & Halperin, S. (1978). Affective and cognitive correlates of course performance in introductory statistics. Journal of Experimental Education, 46, 11-18.
  • Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitude Scale: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. JAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 31.
  • Fenster, M. J. (1992). Statistics courses and adult learners: Assessing potential problems. Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 14,11-22.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1993). The interaction of statistics test anxiety and examination condition in statistics achievement of post-baccalaureate non-statistics majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of South Carolina.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1995). Statistics test anxiety and female students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 413-418.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1998). The dimensions of statistics anxiety: A comparison of prevalence rates among mid-southern university students. Louisiana Educational Research Journal, 23, 23-40.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., DaRos, D. & Ryan, J. M. (1997). The components of statistics anxiety: A phenomenological study. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19, 11-35.
  • Royse, D. & Rompf, E. L. (1992). Math anxiety: A comparison of socialwork and non-social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 270-277.
  • Shultz, K. S. & Koshino, H. (1998). Evidence of reliability and validity for Wise's Attitude Toward Statistics Scale. Psychological Reports, 82, 27-31.
  • Swanson, J. C., Meinert, D. B. & Swanson, N. E. (1994). Business communications: A highly valued core course in business administration. Journal of Education for Business, 69, 235-239.
  • Waters, L. K., Martelli, T. A., Zakrajsek, T. & Popovich, P. M. (1988). Attitudes toward statistics: An evaluation of multiple measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 513-516.
  • Wise, S. L. (1985). The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 401-405.
  • Woehlke, P. L., & Leitner, S. W. (1980). Gender differences in performance on variables related to achievement in graduate level educational statistics. Psychological Reports, 41, 1119-1125.
  • Zanakis, S. H., & Valenzi, E. R. (1997). Student anxiety and attitudes in business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 10-16.
  • Zeidner, M. (1991). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social students: Some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 319-328.