Sixth grade students’ performance on length, area, and volume measurement

Bu çalışmanın amacı, altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin uzunluk, alan ve hacim ölçüleri konularındaki kavramsal ve işlemsel bilgilerini ve sözel problem çözme becerilerini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın verileri, Ankara İli'ndeki devlet ilköğretim okullarında öğrenim gören 445 altıncı sınıf öğrencisinden Kavramsal Bilgi Testi, İşlemsel Bilgi Testi ve Sözel Problem Testi yoluyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular, ölçüler konusunun temelini oluşturan kavramların anlamlandırılması ve koordinasyonunu gerektiren sorulara göre, öğrencilerin işlemsel bilgiye dayalı sorularda daha başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bunun yanı sıra, öğrencilerin hem testlerdeki başarısı arasında hem de ölçüler konusunun alt boyutları (uzunluk, alan ve hacim) arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin testlerde gösterdikleri genel başarı, önceki döneme ait matematik dersi genel başarı notuna göre anlamlı olarak farklılaşırken, cinsiyet açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunamamıştır.

Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin uzunluk, alan ve hacim ölçülerindeki performansları

The purpose of this study was to investigate sixth grade students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and word problem solving skills in the domain of length, area, and volume measurement. Through Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge, and Word- Problem Tests, data was collected from 445 sixth-grade students attending public primary schools in Ankara, Turkey. The findings revealed that the students were more successful in computational tasks than tasks requiring acquisition and coordination of underpinnings of measurement. A significant relationship not only between the tests, but also between the domains of measurement was observed. The overall performances of the students on the tests significantly differed according to previous mathematics achievement, but no gender difference was observed.

___

  • Alkhateeb, H. M. (2001). Gender differences in mathematics achievement among high school students in the United Arab Emirates, 1991-2000. School Science & Mathematics, 101(1), 5-10.
  • Albayrak, M., Isik, C., & Ipek, A. S., (2006). Elementary school children’ performance on measurement. Paper presented at the 7th National Congress on Science and Mathematics Education, September 6-8, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131.
  • Baroody, A. J., & Coslick, R. T. (1998). Fostering children’s mathematical power: An investigative approach to K-8 mathematics instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Battista, M. T. (2003). Understanding students’ thinking about area and volume measurement. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 Yearbook (pp. 122–142). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Bragg, P., & Outhred, L. (2000). What is taught versus what is learnt: The case of linear measurement. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Japan: Program Committee.
  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499-531.
  • Emekli, A. (2001). Diagnosing the misconceptions in teaching measurement and reqired measures. Unpublished master’s thesis, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (3rd ed.). London: Sage publications.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2001). Educational research: A guide to the process. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Grant, T. J., & Kline, K. (2003). Developing building blocks of measurement with young children. In D.H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 Yearbook (pp. 46-56), Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Hart, K. M. (1981). Measurement. In K. M. Hart, (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11- 16 (pp. 9-22). Newcastle upon Tyne: John Murray.
  • Hart, K. M. (1984). Which comes first – Length, area, or volume? Arithmetic Teacher, 31(9), 16-27.
  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Kabiri, M., & Kiamanesh, A. R. (2004). The Role of Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Attitudes and Previous Math Achievement in Students’ Math Performance. Proceedings of the 3rd International Biennial SELF Research Conference, Self-Concept, Motivation and Identity: Where to from here? Berlin.
  • Kamii, C. & Clark, F. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 116-121.
  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Kloosterman, P., Warfield, J., Wearne, D., Koc, Y., Martin, W. G., & Strutchens, M. (2004). Fourth-grade students’ knowledge of mathematics and perceptions of mathematics. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 71–103). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Kordaki, M., & Portani, D. (1998). Children’s approaches to area measurement through different contexts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(3), 303–316.
  • Lehrer, R. (2003). Developing understanding of measurement. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. E. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics. (pp.179-192). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Lubienski, S. (2003). Is our teaching measuring up? Race-, SES-, and gender-related gaps in measurement achievement, In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 Yearbook (pp. 282–292). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Martin, G. W., & Strutchens, M. E. (2000). Geometry and measurement. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 193-234). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  • Olkun, S. (2003). When does the volume formula make sense to students? Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 160-165.
  • Pope, L. (1994). Teaching measurement. In J. Neyland (Ed.), Mathematics education: A handbook for teachers (pp.88-105). New Zeland: The Wellington College of Education.
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346-362.
  • Sahin, A. (2004). Qualitative Assessment of the Quality of Turkish Elementary Schools. Paper commissioned for the Turkey ESS. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Silver, E., A. (1986). Using conceptual and procedural knowledge: A focus on relationships. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp.181-198). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Star, J. R. (2002). Re-conceptualizing procedural knowledge: The emergence of “intelligent” performances among equation solvers. In Mewborn, D., Sztajn, P., White, D., Wiegel, H., Bryant, R., & Nooney, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 999- 1007). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
  • Stephan, M. & Clements, D. H. (2003). Linear and area measurement in prekindergarten to grade 2. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 Yearbook (pp. 3–16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Stephan, M., & Mendiola, J. (2003). Introduction. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 Yearbook (pp. 1-2). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Tan-Sisman, G., & Aksu, M. (2009). Seventh grade students success on the topics of area and premeter. Elementary Education Online. 8 (1), 243 - 253
  • Tan-Sisman, G., & Aksu, M. (2012). The length measurement in the Turkish mathematics curriculum: Its potential to contribute to students’ learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 10 (2), 363 - 385
  • Van de Walle, J. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.