Alternative Dispute Resolution in Educational Settings: A Conceptual Analysis

Bu çalışmanın amacı, uyuşmazlık çözümünde kullanılan alternatif çatışma yönetimi tekniklerinin teorik temellerini açıklamaktır. Bu nedenle, ilkönce geleneksel çatışma ve uyuşmazlık yönetimi tekniklerinin sınırlılıkları tartışılmış ve daha sonra da alternatif çatışma yönetiminin temel ilkeleri açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu ve benzeri çalışmaların son yıllarda okullarda ve eğitim sendikalarının şiddet ve çatışma içeren eylem ve söylemlerini anlamada yardımcı olabileceği ümit edilmektedir.

Eğitim Kurumlarında Alternatif Çatışma Yöntemi: Kavramsal Bir İnceleme

The purpose of this paper is to examine alternative dispute resolution processes and their fundamental principles as well as its applicability in educational settings. First of all, the concept of conflict was explained. Second, the limitations of traditional conflict resolution processes were analyzed. Finally, discussing alternative dispute resolution processes, the paper concluded with implications for educational settings and recommendations.

___

  • American Bar Association. (1989). Altemative dispııte resolulion: An ADR priıner. NVaslıington, D.C: American Bar Association.
  • Bingham, G. (1986). Resolving enviroııınental disputes: A decade of e.vperience. NVaslıington, D.C: The Coııservatioıı Foundation.
  • Breslin, J. W. & Rııbin, J. Z. (Eds.). (1995). Negotialioıı theoıy and praclice. Caıııbridge, MA: The Program oıı Negotialioıı at Harvaıd Lavv Sclıool.
  • Carpenter, S. L. & Kennedy, W. J. D. (1988). Managı’ng pııblic disputes: A practical gııide to handling coııflict and reaching agreenıenls. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Coser, L.A. (1956). The fımctions ofsocial conflict. Nev York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Curcio, J. L. & First, P. F. (1993). Violence in the schools: How ta proacıively prevenl and defııse il. Newbııry Park, CA: Corwin Press.
  • DeJong, W. (1994). School-bascd violence prevention: Froııı the pcaceable school to the pcaceable ııeighborhood. NIDR Fonun, 25, 8-14.
  • Fisher, R., Ury, W. & Palton, B. (1991). Getting lo yes: Negotiating agreemenl ıvithout giving in. New York, NY: Pcngııin Books.
  • Girard, K. & Koch, S. J. (1996). Conflict resolution in the schools: A manıtal for edıtcators. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
  • Goldberg, S. B., Sander F. E. A. & Rogers, N. H. (1992). Dispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation, and other processes. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown and Company.
  • Hall, L. (Ed.). (1993). Negotiation: Strategies for ınutual gaiıı. Ncvbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Himes, J. S. (1980). Conflict and conflict management. Atlıcns, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
  • Ide, W., III. (1993). ADR: A giant step tovard future. Dispute Resolution Journal, R (4), 20-24.
  • Katz, N. H. & Lawyer, I. W. (1993). Conflict resolution: Building bridges. Newbury Park, CA: Convin Press.
  • Katz, N. H. & Lawyer, J. W. (1994). Preventing and ınanaging conflict in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin Press.
  • Kulınert, K. W. (1993). Leadership theory in postmodemist organizations. In R. T. Goleıııbievvski (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. New York: Marcel Dckker.
  • Lantieri, L. & Patti, J. (1996). IVagiııg peace in oıtr schools. Boston, MA: Beacotı Press.
  • McComıick, M. M. (1988). Mediation in the schools: An evaluation of the Wakefıeld pilot peer-mediation program in Tucson, Arizona. (n.p.): American Bar Association.
  • McCucn, G. E. (1995). Clıildren of violence in America: Ideas in conflict. Hudson, VI: Gary McCtıen Pııblications.
  • McDermott, E. P. & Berkelcy, A. E. (1996). Alternative dispute resolution in the svorkplace: Concepts and technicptes fo r hıtman resource e.vecutives and their counsel. Vestport, CT: Quorıım Books.
  • Mediation in the Schools. (1985). A report/directoıy/ bibliography. Vashington, D.C: National Association for Mediation in Education, National Iııstitute for Dispute Resolution, & American Bar Association Special Committee on Dispute Resolution Public Services Division.
  • Mills, M. K. (Ed.). (1991). Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector. Chicago, IL: Nclsoıı-Hall.
  • Moore, C. W. (1986). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolviııg conflict. San Francisco, CA: Josscy- Bass.
  • Moore, P. & Batise, D. (1994). Preventing youth violence: Prejııdice elimination and conflict resolution programs. NİDR Forum, 25, 15-19.
  • Morsc, P. S. & Ivey, A. E. (1996). Face to face: communication and conflict resolution in the schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin Press.
  • Munoz, S. & Tan, N. (1994). Organizing police-youth- comınunity dialogucs to prevent violence. NIDR Forum, 24, 20-24.
  • Sandole, D. J. D. & Menve, H. (1993). Conflict resolution theoıy and practice: hıtegration and applicatioıı. Manclıester, UK: Manchestcr University Press.
  • Schellenberg, J. A. (1996). Conflict resolution: Theoıy, research, and practice. New York, NY: State University of Ne w York Press.
  • Scimecca, J. A. (1993). Theory and alternative dispute resolution: A contradiction in tenııs. Itı D. J. D. Sandole, H. van der Men'c (Eds), Conflict Resolution Theoıy and Practice: hıtegration and Application. Manclıester, UK: Manclıester University Press.
  • Sherman, R. F. (1994). Dispute resolution: Providing for positive youth developıııent and prevention of violence. NIDR Forum, 25, 1-7.
  • Stephenson, M. O. & Pops, G. M. (1991). Public administrators and conflict resolution: Democratic theory, adıııinistrative capacity, and the case of ııegotiated rule- nıaking, Itı M. K. Mills, (Ed.) Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Public Sector. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Sasskind, L. & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolviııg public dispııtes. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Wilburn, K. O. & Bates, L. (1997). Conflict resolution in Aıııerica’s schools. Dispute Resolution Journal, 52 (I), 87-71.