Achieving gender parity in primary school education in Turkey via the campaign called “haydi kızlar okula” (girls, let’s go to school)

İlköğretime katılımda cinsiyet eşitsizliği, Türkiye de dahil olmak üzere gelişmekte olan birçok ülkenin karşılaştığı en karmaşık eğitim sorunlarındandır. Türkiye’de ilköğretim çağındaki yaklaşık 640,000 çocuk okula gitmemektedir ve cinsiyet eşitsizliğinden dolayı okul dışındaki bu çocukların %60’ını kız çocukları oluşturmaktadır (UNESCO, 2010). Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de uygulanan en geniş ve etkili kampanyalardan birisi olan “Haydi Kızlar Okula” kampanyası üzerinden Türkiye’nin eğitimde cinsiyet eşitliğini sağlamadaki çabalarını analiz etmektedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları Türkiye’nin eğitimde cinsiyet eşitliğinin sağlanması konusunda son yıllarda büyük aşamalar katettiğini, ancak bu çabaların özellikle en çok ihtiyaç duyulan bölgelerde hız kaybetmeden devam ettirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu kapsamda, son yıllarda ulusal veya uluslararası kurumlarla işbirliği içerisinde gerçekleştirilen ve kız çocuklarının eğitime katılımlarının artırılmasını amaçlayan kampanyaların gerekli değişiklikler yapılarak devam ettirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Türkiye’ de “haydi kızlar okula” kampanyası yardımı ile ilköğretimde cinsiyet eşitliğinin sağlanması

Achieving gender parity in primary education is one of the most complex educational issues with which many developing countries, including Turkey, struggle. In 2007 alone, Turkey had approximately 640,000 children of primary school age who were out of school, and around 60% of those were girls (UNESCO, 2010). For this study, “Haydi Kızlar Okula”, which was one of the biggest and the most effective education campaigns implemented in Turkey, is analyzed to present a systematic evaluation of Turkey’s current efforts to increase gender parity in access to education via this campaign. The results of our analysis show that although Turkey is making strides toward closing the gender gap in primary school participation, it is important to extend this effort without losing momentum, especially in the areas where gender disparity in access to education is the highest. Hence, campaigns devoted to female education through collaboration between the Turkish government and national or international foundations in the last decade should continue with some necessary changes and modifications.

___

  • Bakis, O., Levent, H., Insel, A., & Polat, S. (2009). Türkiye’de Eğitime Erişimin Belirleyicileri. Istanbul: Eğitim Reformu Girişimi, Sabancı Üniversitesi.
  • Duman, A. (2010). Female education inequality in Turkey: Factors affecting girls› schooling decisions. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 1(3), 243–258.
  • Goksel, I. (2009). Determinants of school attainment in Turkey and the impact of the extension of compulsory education. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Irish Economic Association, Blarney, Co Cork.
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2004). Turkey demographic and health survey, 2003. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General
  • Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organization and European Union. Ankara, Turkey.
  • Lincove, J. A. (2006). Efficiency, equity and girls’ education. Public Administration & Development, 26, 339–357.
  • Lockheed, M. E., & others. (1990). Primary education: A world bank policy paper. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • MEB. (2010a). Haydi Kızlar Okula Kampanyası Uygulama Sonuçları, Retrieved February 2010 from http://haydikizlarokula.meb.gov.tr/uygulama_sonuclari_2003.php
  • MEB. (2010b). Haydi Kızlar Okula Projesi, Retrieved January 2010 from http://iogm.meb.gov.tr/pages. php?page=projects&id=05
  • MEB. (2010c). National education statistics formal education 2009–2010. Ankara: Ministry of National Education.
  • OECD. (2007). Reviews of national policies for education: Basic education in Turkey 2007. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). A further international update and implications. The Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 583–604.
  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. Elsevier, 22(9), 1325–1343.
  • Sayilan, T. (2006). Kadın eğitimi ve sosyal dışlanma. Kadın İstihdamı Zirvesi, İstanbul (10–11 Şubat 2006).
  • Smits, J., & Gunduz-Hosgor, A. (2006). Effects of family background characteristics on educational participation in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(5), 545–560.
  • Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors. Economics of Education Review, 21(5), 455–470.
  • Tietjen, K., & Prather, C. (1991). Educating girls: Strategies to ıncrease access, persistence, and achievement. Washington, DC: Office of Women in Development.
  • Todaro, M. P. (2000). Economic development. New York: Wesley Longman Inc. Tomul, E. (2008). The relative effects of family socio-economic characteristics on participation in education in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 30, 153–168.
  • Tomul, E. (2011). Educational inequality in Turkey: An evaluation by Gini Index. Education and Science, 160, 133–143.
  • Toprakci, E. (2010). The reality of primary schools and basic education in Turkey. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 1–17.
  • UNDP. (1996). Human development report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
  • UNESCO. (2008). Overcoming inequality: Why governance matters. EFA Global Monitoring Report.
  • Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • UNESCO. (2010). Reaching the marginalized. EFA Global Monitoring Report. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • UNICEF. (2003). A gender review in education, Turkey. Analysis of Results. Ankara: UNICEF.
  • UNICEF. (2006) haydi kızlar okula! Kızların eğitimi programı 2001–2005, Retrieved October 2009 from http://www.unicef.org/turkey/pr/_ge6.html
  • World Bank. (2001). Attacking poverty: Opportunity, Empowerment, and Security. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank. (2005). Sustainable pathways to an effective, equitable, and efficient education system for preschool through secondary school education. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.