KİMLİK KAVRAMI VE TEORİK YAKLAŞIMLAR
Kimlik sosyal bilimlerde en yaygın kullanılan kavramlardan biridir. Bununla birlikte aynı zamanda tanımlaması en zor ve belirsiz, tartışmalı kavramlarından biridir. Farklı teorik ve metodolojik yaklaşımlar, kavramı farklı içeriklerle tanımlamaktadırlar. Bu makalede farklı perspektiflere sahip sosyolojik ve sosyal psikolojik yaklaşımların kimliği nasıl tanımladıkları incelenmektedir. Kimlik üzerine yapılan çağdaş tartışmaların en önemli sorusu, kavramın teorik bir kategori olarak analitik kapasitesinin ne olduğudur. Bu tartışma ekseninde kimliğin hem terim hem kavram olarak belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Sosyal bilimlerin farklı alanlarında kullanılan içeriğindeki ortak temeller belirlenirken, farklı teorik ve bilimsel yaklaşımların kimlik kavramına dair önermeleri değerlendirilmektedir. Kavramın özellikle sosyolojideki gelişimine ve farklı tanımlarına yer verilerek okullara göre bir sınıflandırma yapılmıştır
The Concept of Identity and Theoretical Approaches
Identity is one of the concepts which is used most common in social sciences. But it is also the controversial one which is the most difficult and ambiguous to define. Different theoretical and methodological approaches define the concept in different contexts. This article examines that how different sociological and social psychological approaches define the identity concept. The most significant question of contemporary debates on identity is what the analytical capacity of the concept is, as a theoretical category. It is aimed to determine identity conceptually with respect to this debate. The suggestions of different theoretical and scholarly approaches to identity are evaluated while determining common traits in various usages of identity in social sciences. The identity concept has been classified with reference to different schools and development of the concept in sociology have been examined
___
- Bamberg, M. / De Fina, A. / Schiffrin (2011), “Discourse and Identity Construction” Vignoles, L. Vivian/ Schwartz, Seth C./ Luyckx, Koen (Ed.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (London: Springer): 177-199. Barth, F. (2001), Etnik Gruplar ve Sınırları, (İstanbul: Bağlam) (Çev: Ayhan Kaya/Seda Gürkan).
- Brubaker, R. (2004), Ethnicity Without Groups, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
- Cerulo, Karen A. (1997), “Identity Construction: New Issues New Directions” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 385-409.
- Cornell, S. /Hartmann, D. (1994), Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World (London: Sage Publications).
- Deaux, K. (2000), “Theoretical Perspectives: Models, Meanings and Motivations” Capozza, Dora/ Brown, Rupert (Ed.), Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research (London: Sage Publications): 1-14.
- Erikson, Erik H.(1987), Childhood and Society (London: Paladin, reprinted). Foote, Nelson N. (1951), “Identification as the Basis for a Theory of Motivation” American Sociological Review 16: 14-21.
- Gleason, P. (1983), “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History” The Journal of American History Vol.69 No.4: 910-931
- Hogg, Michael A./ Abrams, D. (1998), Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (New York: Routledge).
- Hutchinson, J./ Smith, A.D (Ed.) (1996), Ethnicity (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
- Isaacs, H. (1975), Idols of Tribe (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
- Jenkins, R. (2008), Social Identity (London: Routledge, third edition).
- Malesevic, S. (2002), “Identity: Conceptual, Operational and Historical Critique”, Malesevic, Sinisa/Haugaard, Mark (Ed.), Making Sense of Collectivity: Ethnicity, Nationalism and Globalisation (London: Pluto Press): 195-215.
- Malesevic, S. (2004), The Sociology of Ethnicity (London: Sage Publications).
- Martin, Denis-C. (1995), “The Choices of Identity” Social Identities Vol.1 Issue 1: 1-16.
- McAdams, Dan P. (2011), “Narrative Identity” Vignoles, L. Vivian/ Schwartz, Seth C./ Luyckx, Koen (Ed.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (London: Springer): 99-115.
- Morris, Charles W. (Ed.) (1972), Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist George H. Mead, (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
- Ricoeur, P. (2008), “Anlamlı Eylemi Bir Metin Gibi Görmek” Rabinow, Paul/ Sullivan, William (Ed.), Toplumbilimlerinde Yorumcu Yaklaşım (İstanbul: Deniz Yay.) (Çev: Taha Parla, ikinci baskı): 63-99.
- Rabinow, P. / Sullivan, W. (2008), “Yorumcu Eğilim: Bir Yaklaşımın Doğuşu” Rabinow, Paul/ Sullivan, William (Ed.), Toplumbilimlerinde Yorumcu Yaklaşım (İstanbul: Deniz Yay.) (Çev: Taha Parla, ikinci baskı): 9-36.
- Serpe, Richard T./ Stryker, S. (2011), “The Symbolic Interactionist Perspective and Identity Theory” Vignoles, L. Vivian/ Schwartz, Seth C./ Luyckx, Koen (Ed.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (London: Springer): 225-248.
- Spears, R. (2011), “Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective” Vignoles, L. Vivian/ Schwartz, Seth C./ Luyckx, Koen (Ed.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (London: Springer): 201-224.
- Stryker, S. (1977), “Developments in Two Social Psychologies: Toward an Appreciation of Mutual Relevance” Sociometry 40: 145-160.
- Tajfel, H. (1972b), “Some Developments in European Social Psychology” European Journal of Social Psychology 2: 307-322.
- Thoits, Peggy A./Virshup, Lauren K. (1997), “Me’s and We’s: Forms and Functions of Social Identities” Ashmore, Richard D./ Jussim, Lee (Ed.), Self and Identity: Fundamental Issues (New York: Oxford University Press): 106-133.
- Vignoles, L. Vivian/ Schwartz, Seth C./ Luyckx, Koen (2011), “Introduction: Toward an Integrative View of Identity” Vignoles, L. Vivian/ Schwartz, Seth C./ Luyckx, Koen (Ed.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (London: Springer): 1-27.
- Weber, M. (1978), “Ethnic Groups”, Roth, Guenther/ Wittich, Claus (Ed.), Economy and Society, (California: University of California Press): 385- 398.
- Woodward, K. (2002), Understanding Identity, (London: Oxford University Press).
- ISSN: 1303-9202
- Başlangıç: 2003
- Yayıncı: EĞİTİM VE BİLİM EMEKÇİLERİ SENDİKASI