Entropy Tabanlı Bütünleşik ÇKKV Yaklaşımı ile Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Performans Ölçümü
Sürdürülebilir kalkınma kavramının işletme düzeyindeki karşılığı olan kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik, çok boyutlu bir kavramdır ve ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal olmak üzere üç boyutu bulunmaktadır. Bu üç boyutun tek bir boyuta indirgenmesinde sorunlar ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri (ÇKKV), bu değişkenlerin birlikte değerlendirilmesi için kullanışlı bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik performansının değerlendirilmesinde ÇKKV yöntemlerinin melez kullanımına dayalı bir algoritma önerilmiştir. Entropy yöntemi kriterlerin ağırlığını belirlemek için kullanılırken, Topsis ve Gri İlişkisel Analiz (GİA) yöntemleri ise alternatiflerin performans sıralamalarını belirlemek için kullanılmıştır. Önerilen metodoloji, Türkiye’de beyaz eşya sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir firmanın kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik performansını değerlendirmek üzere kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca, kriterlerin ağırlıkları değiştirilerek duyarlılık analizi gerçekleştirilmiş ve bu yolla sonuçların hassasiyeti test edilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda, önerilen yaklaşımın sürdürülebilirlik performans ölçümünde etkili bir şekilde kullanılabileceği tespit edilmiştir.
Entropy Based Hybrid MCDM Approach for Measuring the Corporate Sustainability Performance
Sustainability as the business definition of the concept of sustainable development is a multidimensional concept which has three categories including economic, environmental, and social. Problems arise as we try to reduce the number of categories from three to one. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods provide a suitable framework where these variables can be used collectively. In this study, we suggest an algorithm based on a hybrid multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) model to measure corporate sustainability performance. The Entropy method was used to find out criteria weightings, and Topsis and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) methods were used to define performance ranking of alternatives. The suggested methodology was used to measure the corporate sustainability performance of a company from the white goods industry in Turkey. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis by changing criteria weightings, and therefore, tested the sensitivity of the results. It was concluded that the suggested approach could be used effectively in measuring sustainability performance.
___
- Acar, E., Kilic, M. ve Güner, M.(2015) “Measurement of Sustainability
Performance in Textile Industry By Using A Multi-Criteria
Decision Making Method” Journal Of Textile and Apparel, 25 (1):
3-9.
- Adaoğlu, C. (1999) “Yasal Düzenlemelerin İstanbul Menkul
Kıymetler Borsası (İMKB) Şirketlerinin Temettü Politikalarına
Etkisi” İMKB Dergisi, 3(11): 1-15.
- Akgüç, Ö. (1995) “Mali Tablolar Analizi” Avcıol Yayın, İstanbul,
1995.
- Aktan, B. ve Bodur, B. (2006) “Oranlar Aracılığı ile Finansal Durumunuzu
Nasıl Çözümlersiniz?” Journal Of Yaşar University, 1(1):
49-67.
- Aktaş, R., Doğanay, M., Atılım, M. ve Başcı, E. S. (2005) “Finansal
Yönetim” Saüsem Yayınları, Sakarya.
- Aktin, T. ve Gergin, Z. (2016) “Mathematical Modelling Of Sustainable
Procurement Strategies: Three Case Studies” Journal
Of Cleaner Production, 113: 767-780.
- Alpman, D. (2008) “Uluslararası Finansal Raporlama Standartlarına
Genel Bir Bakış ve Bir Uygulama Örneği”, Deloitte Türkiye,
1-63, http://www.denetimnet.net/UserFiles/Documents/
- UFRS%20Genel%20Bak%C4%B1%C5%9F.pdf (10.10.2016).
Anonymous (2004) “Su Kirliliği Kontrolü Yönetmeliği Tebliği”.
- Ankara: Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı. http://www.resmigazete.
gov.tr/eskiler/2004/12/20041231.htm, (13.10.2016).
- Arçelik sürdürülebilirlik raporu, http://www.arcelikas.com/
sayfa/204/Surdurulebilirlik_Raporu, (15.10.2016).
- Athawale, V.M. ve Chakraborty, S. (2011) “Application of Grey
Relational Analysis Method in Solving Supplier Selection Problems”
The Iup Journal of Operations Management, 10(1): 18-28.
- Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Saen, R. F. ve Mirhedayatian, S. M.
(2015) “A New Fuzzy DEA Model For Evaluation Of Efficiency
And Effectiveness Of Suppliers in Sustainable Supply Chain
Management Context” Computers & Operations Research, 54:
274-285.
- Balteiro, D. L., González, V. R. ve Romero, C. (2011) “Making
Sustainability Rankings Using Compromise Programming. An
Application to European Paper Industry” Silva Fennica, 45(4):
761-773.
- Baumgartner, R.J. ve Ebner. D. (2010) “Corporate Sustainability
Strategies: Sustainability Profiles And Maturity Levels” Sustainable
Development, 18 (2): 76–89.
- Blau, G. (1989) “Testing The Generalizability Of A Career Commitment
Measure And Its Impact On Employee Turnover” Journal
Of Vocational Behavior, 35(1): 88-103.
- Chaharsooghi, S. K. ve Ashrafi, M. (2014) “Sustainable Supplier
Performance Evaluation and Selection with Neofuzzy Topsis
Method” International Scholarly Research Notices, 1-10.
- Chan, J. W. Ve Tong, T. K. (2007) “Multi-criteria material selections
and end-of-life product strategy: Grey relational analysis
approach” Materials & Design, 28(5): 1539-1546.
- Chiou, C. Y., Hsu, C. W. ve Chen, H. C. (2011) “Using Dematel
To Explore A Casual And Effect Model Of Sustainable Supplier
Selection” In Business Innovationand Technology Management
(APBITM), Dalian, China, 240-244.
- Chithambaranathan, P., Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A. ve
Palaniappan, P. K. (2015) “Service Supply Chain Environmental
Performance Evaluation Using Grey Based Hybrid Mcdm
- Approach” International Journal Of Production Economics, 166:
163-176.
- Dadzie, A. A., Dadzie, A. E. Ve Turkson, C. A. (2016) “Topsis
Extension Framework For Re-Conceptualizing Sustainability
Measurement” Kybernetes, 45(1): 70-86.
- Dyllick, T. Ve Hockerts, K. (2002) “Beyond The Business Case
For Corporate Sustainability” Business Strategy and the Environment,
11(2): 130-141.
- Ebner D. ve Baumgartner, R. J. (2007) “The Relationship
Between Sustainable Development and Corporate Social
Responsibility” Corporate Responsibility Research Conference,
17 Eylül, Dublin.
- Erol, I., Sencer, S. ve Sari, R. (2011) “A New Fuzzy Multi-Criteria
Framework For Measuring Sustainability Performance Of A
Supply Chain” Ecological Economics, 70(6): 1088-1100.
- Ghasemi, A. ve Nadiri, M. (2016) “Performance Assessment Of
Iranian Petrochemical Companies Using Sustainable Excellence
Model” Safety Science, 87: 280-291.
- Giannarakis, G. ve Theotokas, I. (2011) “The Effect of Financial
Crisis in Corporate Social Responsibility Performance” International
Journal Of Marketing Studies, 3(1): 2-10.
- Godfrey, M. ve Manikas, A. (2014) “Integrating Sustainability
into a Goal Programming Exercise” Business Education and
Accreditation, 6(1): 45-54.
- González, M. F., García-Á. L. F., Salomon, V. A. P., Gómez, M. J. ve
Hernández, C. T. (2016) “Sustainability Performance Measurement
With Analytic Network Process And Balanced Scorecard:
Cuban Practical Case” Production, 26(3): 527-539.
- Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. ve Jafarian, A. (2013) “A Fuzzy Multi
Criteria Approach For Measuring Sustainability Performance
Of A Supplier Based On Triple Bottom Line Approach” Journal
Of Cleaner Production, 47: 345-354.
- Goyal, P., Rahman, Z. ve Kazmi, A. A. (2013) “Corporate Sustainability
Performance And Firm Performance Research:
Literature Review And Future Research Agenda” Management
Decision, 51(2): 361-379.
- Goyal, P., Rahman, Z. ve Kazmi, A. A.(2015) “Identification
And Prioritization Of Corporate Sustainability Practices Using
Analytical Hierarchy Process” Journal Of Modelling İn Management,
10(1): 23-49.
- GRI, Global Reporting Initiative, Environmental indicator
protocols, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/
Turkish-G3-Environment-Indicator-Protocols.pdf (09.09.2016).
- GRI, Global Reporting Initiative, http://www.globalreporting.
org/resourcelibrary/Turkish-G4-Part-One.pdf, (09.09.2016).
- GRI, Global Reporting Initiative, Economic Indicator Protocols,
https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Turkish-
G3-Economic-Indicator Protocols.pdf, (15.10.2016).
- Gürsoy, B. (1975) “Kamu Maliyesi, Giriş- Masraflar” Ankara
Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
- Hassan, M. F., Saman, M. Z. M., Sharif, S. ve Omar, B. (2016)
“Sustainability Evaluation Of Alternative Part Configurations In
Product Design: Weighted Decision Matrix And Artificial Neural
Network Approach” Clean Technologies And Environmental
Policy, 18(1): 63-79.
- Hernández, C. T., Marins, F. A. S., Rocha, P. M. (2009) “Using AHP
And ANP To Evaluate The Relation Between Reverse Logistics
And Corporate Performance in Brazilian Automotive Industry”.
In Proceeding Of Proceedings Of The 10th International Symposium
On The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Multi-Criteria
Decision Making Held At Pennsylvania, USA.
- Herzig, C. ve Schaltegger, S. (2006) “Reporting External
Accounting Frameworks and Benchmarking: Corporate Sustainability
Reporting. An Overwiev, Sustainability Accounting
and Reporting” Schaltegger, S., Bennetand, M., Burrit, R. (eds)
Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 301-324..
- Hughey, A. W. ve Mussnug, K. J. (1997) “Designing Effective Employee
Training Programmes” Training For Quality, 5(2): 52-57.
- Hwang, C. L. ve Yoon, K. (1981) “Lecture Notes in Economics
and Mathematical Systems: Multiple Attribute Decision
Making: Methods And Appllication” Springer, Verlag, Berlin,
Heidelberg, New York, 1-222.
- Jauhar, S. K. ve Pant, M. (2016) “Using Differential Evolution
To Develop A Carbon-Integrated Model For Performance
Evaluation And Selection Of Sustainable Suppliers in Indian
Automobile Supply Chain” In Proceedings Of Fifth International
Conference On Soft Computing For Problem Solving,
515-528, Springer, Singapore, 2.
- Juan, Y. K., Gao, P. ve Wang, J. (2010) “A Hybrid Decision Support
System For Sustainable Office Building Renovation And Energy
Performance Improvement” Energy and Buildings, 42(3): 290-
297.
- Kanber, R., Baştuğ, R., Büyüktaş, D., Ünlü, M. Ve Kapur, B. (2010)
“Küresel iklim değişikliğinin su kaynakları ve tarımsal sulamaya
etkileri.” Türkiye ziraat mühendisliği VII. Teknik kongresi, 83-
118, 11-15 Ocak, Ankara.
- Lombard, L. P., Ortiz, J. ve Pout, C. (2008) “A Review On Buildings
Energy Consumption Information” Energy and Buildings, 40(3):
394-398.
- Makdisi, R. S. (1991) “Tannery Wastes Definition, Risk Assessment
And Cleanup Options”, Berkeley, California. Journal Of
Hazardous Materials, 29(1): 79-96.
- Mazurkiewicz, P. (2004) “Corporate Environmental Responsibility:
Is A Common. CSR Framework Possible” World Bank, 2,
1-18.
- Monjezi, M., Amiri, H., Farrokhi, A. ve Goshtasbi, K. (2010) “Prediction
Of Rock Fragmentation Due To Blasting in Sarcheshmeh
Copper Mine Using Artificial Neural Networks” Geotechnique
And Geology Engineering, 28(4): 423–430.
- Ness, B., Urbel, P. E., Anderberg, S. ve Olsson, L. (2007) “Categorising
Tools For Sustainability Assessment” Ecological
Economics, 60(3): 498–508.
- Rad, S. ve Yarşı, G. (2005) “Silifke İlçesi’nde Serada Domates
Yetiştiren İşletmelerin Ekonomik Performansları ve Birim Ürün
Maliyetleri”. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1): 26-33.
- Rajak, S. ve Vinodh, S. (2015) “Application Of Fuzzy Logic For
Social Sustainability Performance Evaluation: A Case Study Of
An Indian Automotive Component Manufacturing Organization”
Journal Of Cleaner Production, 108: 1184-1192.
- Sandıkcıoğlu, A. (2005) “Kurumsal Yönetim Uyum Derecelendirmesi”,
Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu Ortaklıklar Finansmanı
Dairesi, Yeterlik Etüdü, Ankara.
- Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K. ve Dikshit, A.K. (2007) “Development
Of Composite Sustainability Performance Index For
Steel Industry” Ecological Indicators, 7: 565–588.
- Singh, S., Olugu, E. U., Musa, S. N. ve Mahat, A. B. (2015) “Fuzzy-
Based Sustainability Evaluation Method For Manufacturing
SMEs Using Balanced Scorecard Framework” Journal Of Intelligent
Manufacturing, 1-18.
- Sürmeli, F. (2003) “Genel Muhasebe”, 1341, Anadolu Universitesi.
Tavana, M., Shabanpour, H., Yousefi, S. ve Saen, R. F. (2016) “A
Hybrid Goal Programming And Dynamic Data Envelopment
Analysis Framework For Sustainable Supplier Evaluation” Neural
Computing And Applications, 1-14.
- Tilt, C. A. (2009) “Corporate Responsibility, Accounting And
Accounts”, Idowu, S.; Filho, O. W. L. (eds) Professionals’ Perspectives
of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer- Verlag, Berlin
Heidelberg.
- Tong, C. C. ve Lin, T. Y. (2008) “Applying Grey Relational Method
To Determine The Carbon Black Ranking of Rubber Samples”
Journal Of Grey System, 11(1): 27-34.