Algılanan Özerklik ve Etki İle Psikolojik Sahiplenme Arasındaki İlişkide Kontrol Algısının Aracılık Etkisi: Banka Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma
Psikolojik sahiplenme, yasal düzlemde sahiplikleri olmamasına rağmen işgörenlerin iş ve örgütlerine yönelik sahiplenme hissedebileceğini ifade etmektedir. İşini ve örgütünü psikolojik bağlamda sahiplenen işgörenlerin olumlu duygu, tutum ve davranışlar sergiledikleri araştırmalara sıklıkla konu olmaktadır. Ancak psikolojik sahiplenme olgusuna ilişkin bir teorinin oluştuğunu söylemek güçtür ve daha fazla ampirik araştırmanın kuramsal çalışmaları doğrulaması gerekmektedir. Özellikle de psikolojik sahiplenme olgusunu ortaya çıkaran öncüllerin neler olduğu ve olguyu ne şekilde etkilediğinin araştırılması önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı algılanan özerklik ve etki ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve bu ilişkide kontrol algısının aracılık etkisinin olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Veriler, anket aracılığıyla Bitlis ve Bitlis bağlı Tatvan ilçesinde bankacılık sektöründeki örgütlerde çalışan 158 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda özerlik algısı ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişkide karar kontrolün tam aracılık etkisi olduğu bulgulanmıştır
In Relationship Among Perceived Autonomy-Impact and Psychological Ownership The Mediating Effect Of Perceived Control: A Research on Banking Employees
Psychological ownership, although there is no in the legal context ownership, express that employees can feel ownership for their work and organizations. It is subjected in various researches that Employees who feel ownership towards their work and organization have frequently exhibited positive emotions, attitudes and behaviors. However, it is difficult to say that a theory about phenomenon of psychological ownership is formed and the theoretical studies should be verified by more empirical research. Especially, it is important to study which antecedents revealed the psychological ownership phenomenon and how they affected the phenomenon. The purpose of this study is both to examine the relationship between perceived autonomy and impact, and psychological ownership and to determine whether there is mediation effect of perceived control on this relationship. The data is collected from 158 employees who work banking sector in Bitlis and Tatvan. The findings of analysis indicated that control decision fully mediates the relationship beetwen perceived autonomy and psychological ownership
___
- Asatryan, V. S., ve Oh, H. (2008) “Psychological Ownership
Theory: An Exploratory Application in The Restaurant
İndustry”, Journal of Hospitality&TourismResearch, 32:
363-386.
- Atalay, C. G. and Özler, D. E. (2013) “A Research to
Determine the Relationship between Organizational
Justice and Psychological Ownership among Nonfamily
Employees in a Family Business”, Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 247-256.
- Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., ve Luthans, F (2009).
“Psychologicalownership: Theoretical Extensions,
Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes”, Journal
of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
- Avey, J. B.,Wernsing, T. S., ve Palanski, M. E. (2012)
“Exploringtheprocess of Ethicalleadership: The
mediating Role Of Employee Voice and psychological
ownership”, Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1): 21-34.
- Baron RM, ve Kenny D. A. (1986) “The ModeratorMediator
Variable Distinction in Social Psychological
Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical
Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 51:1173–1182.
- Bayram, N. (2013) “Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş
Amos Uygulamaları” Ezi Kitapevi: Bursa.
- Bernhard, F., ve O'Driscoll, M. P. (2011) “Psychological
Ownership in Small Family-Owned Businesses:
Leadership Style and Non Family-Employees’ Work
Attitudes and Behaviors”, Group & Organization
Management, 36(3): 345-384.
- Brashear, T. G., Manolis, C., ve Brooks, C. M. (2005) “The
Effects of Control, Trust, and Justice on Salesperson
Turnover”, Journal of Business Research, 58(3): 241-249.
- Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., ve Robinson, S. L.
(2005) “Territoriality in Organizations”, Academy of
Management Review, 30(3): 577-594.
- Chi, N. W., ve Han, T. S. (2008) “Exploring The
Linkages Between Formal Ownership and
Psychological Ownership for The Organization: The
Mediating Role of Organizational Justice”, Journal
of OccupationalandOrganizationalPsychology, 81(4):
691-711.
- Doğan, H., ve Ali, C. A. N. (2009) “Örgütlerde Mesleki
Özerklik Sorunu ve Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Sağlık Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi’nde Ampirik Bir
Çalışma”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Dergisi, 18(1): 133-148.
- Ergeneli, A., ve Arı, G. S. (2005) “Krizde İşten Çıkarılmaların
Banka Yöneticileri Üzerine Etkileri: Örgütsel Bağlılık,
Güven ve Güçlendirme Algıları”, Ankara Üniversitesi
SBF Dergisi, 60(01): 121-148.
- Etzioni, A. (1991) “The Socio-Economics of Property. In
F. W. Rudmin (Ed.), To Have Possessions: A Hand Book
on Ownership and Property”, Special Issue, Journal of
Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 465-468.
- Florkowski, G. W. (1987) “The Organizational Impact of
Profit Sharing”, Academy of management Review, 12(4):
622-636.
- Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Khan, M. A., ve Hijazi, S.
T. (2011) “Transformational Leadership, Employee
Engagement and Performance: Mediating Effect of
Psychological Ownership”, Africanjournal of business
management, 5(17): 7391-7403.
- Giacobbe -Miller, J., (1995) “A Test of The Group Values
and Control Models of Procedural Justice From The
Competing Perspectives of Labor and Management”,
Personal Psychology, 48(1):115–42.
- Gillon R. (1995), Philosophical Medical Ethics, Wiley
Medical, London.
- Han, T. S.,Chiang, H. H., ve Chang, A. (2010) “Employee
Participation in Decision Making, Psychological
- Ownership and Knowledge Sharing: Mediating Role
of Organizational Commitment in Taiwanese HighTechorganizations”,
The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 21(12): 2218-2233.
- Kaur, D., Sambasivan, M., ve Kumar, N. (2013) “Effect
of Spiritual İntelligence, Emotional İntelligence,
Psychological Ownership and Burnout on Caring
Behaviour of Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional study”, Journal
of Clinical Nursing, 22(21-22): 3192-3202.
- Lee, Y., ve Chen, A. N. (2011) “Usability Design and
psychological Ownership of A Virtual World”, Journal
of Management Information Systems, 28(3): 269-308.
- Liu, J.,Wang, H., Hui, C., ve Lee, C. (2012) “Psychological
Ownership: How Having Control Matters”, Journal of
Management Studies, 49(5): 869-895.
- Mayhew, M. G.,Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., ve Gardner,
J. (2007) “A study of the antecedents and consequences
of psychological ownership in organizational
settings”, TheJournal of social psychology, 147(5), 477-
500.
- Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015) “Yapısal Eşitlik
Modellemesi Amos Uygulamaları”, Detay Yayıncılık:
Ankara.
- Miller, M. L., (1989) “Process and Decision Control
in the Work Place: Separate Effects, independence
From Distributive Justice, and Tests of Explanatory
Mechanisms”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology,10(4):
337-354.
- O’driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., ve Coghlan, A. M. (2006)
“The Psychology of Ownership Work Environment
Structure, Organizational Commitment, and Citizenship
Behaviors”, Group & Organization Management, 31(3):
388-416.
- Olckers, C.,ve DuPlessis, Y. (2012) “Psychological
Ownership: A Managerial Construct for Talent Retention
and Organisational Effectiveness”, African Journal of
Business Management, 6(7): 2585-2596.
- Ötken, A. B. (2015) “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve
Psikolojik Sahiplenme Arasındaki İlişki ve Bu İlişkide
Örgütsel Adaletin Rolü”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi
Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2): 113-140.
- Özler, H., Yılmaz, A. and Özler, D. (2008) “Psychological
Ownership: An Empirical Study on Its Antecedents and
Impacts upon Organizational Behaviors”, Problems and
Perspectives in Management, 6(3), 38-47.
- Paré, G., Sicotte, C., ve Jacques, H. (2006) “The Effects
of Creating Psychological Ownership on Physicians'
Acceptance of Clinical İnformation Systems” Journal
of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2):
197-205.
- Pierce, J. L., ve Furo, C. A. (1991) “Employee Ownership:
Implications for Management”, Organizational
Dynamics, 18(3): 32-43.
- Pierce, J. L.,ve Jussila, I. (2010) “Collective Psychological
Ownership Within The Work and Organizational Context:
Construct Introduction and Elaboration”, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 31(6): 810-834.
- Pierce, J. L., ve Rodgers, L. (2004) “The Psychology of
Ownership and Worker-Owner Productivity”, Group &
Organization Management, 29(5). 588-613.
- Pierce, J. L.,Jussila, I., ve Cummings, A. (2009)
“Psychological Ownership Within The Job Design
Context: Revision of The Job Characteristics Model”,
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4): 477-496.
- Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., ve Dirks, K. T. (2003) “The State of
Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending A
Century of Research”, Review of general psychology, 7(1):
84.
- Pierce, J. L.,Kostova, T., ve Dirks, K. T. (2001)
“Toward A Theory of Psychological Ownership in
Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 26(2):
298-310.
- Pierce, J. L.,O'driscoll, M. P., ve Coghlan, A. M. (2004)
“Work Environment Structure And Psychological
Ownership: The Mediating Effects Of Control”, The
Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5): 507-534.
- Pierce, J. L.,Rubenfeld, S. A., ve Morgan, S. (1991)
“Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process
and Effects”, Academy of Management Review, 16(1):
121-144.
- Ryan, R. M., ve Deci, E. L. (2006) “Self Regulation and
the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology
Need Choice, Self Determination, and Will?”, Journal of
Personality, 74(6): 1557-1586.
- Sieger, P.,Zellweger, T., ve Aquino, K. (2013) “Turning
Agentsinto Psychological Principals: Aligning
Interests of Non Owners through Psychological
Ownership”, Journal of Management Studies, 50(3):
361-388.
- Spreitzer, G. M. (1995) “Psychological Empowerment
in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and
Validation”, Academy of management Journal, 38(5):
1442-1465.
- Tolay, E., Sürgevil, O., ve Topoyan, M. (2012) “Akademik
Çalısma Ortamında Yapısal ve Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin
Duygusal Bağlılık ve İs Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkileri”, Ege
Akademik Bakış, 12(4): 449-465.
- Turunç, Ö., ve Çelik, M. (2010) “Örgütsel Özdeşleşme
Ve Kontrol Algılamalarının, Çalışanların İşten Ayrılma
Niyeti Ve İş Performansına Etkileri”, Atatürk Üniversitesi
İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(3): 163-181.
- Tyler, T. R. (1989) “The Psychology of Procedural Justice:
A Test of The Group-Value Model”, Journal of Personality
And Social Psychology, 57(5): 830-838.
- Uçar, Z. (2015) “Kontrol algısı-psikolojik sahiplenme
ilişkisi üzerinde algılanan aşırı vasıflılığın düzenleyicilik
etkisi”, International Journal of Applied Business and
Management Studies; Vol. 1, No.1: 40-58.
- Van Dyne, L.,ve Pierce, J. L. (2004) “Psychological
Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three
Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and
Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 25(4): 439-459.
- Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., ve Kostova, T. (1995)
“Psychological Ownership: An Empirical examination
of Its Consequences”, Group & Organization
Management, 20(2): 210-226.
- Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L., ve Parks, J.M., (1995)
“Extra-Role Behaviors: In Pursuit of Construct and
Definitional Clarity” (A bridge over muddied waters).
In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research
in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215-285).
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Wagner, S. H.,Parker, C. P., ve Christiansen, N. D. (2003)
“Employees That Think and Act Like Owners: Effects
of Ownership Beliefs and Behaviors on Organizational
Effectiveness”Personnel Psychology, 56(4): 847-871.
- Yeşil, Ü., Bancar, A., ve Budak, G. (2015) “Psikolojik Sahiplik
Kavramına İlişkin Bir Literatür İncelemesi”, Eskişehir
Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2):
59-82.
- Yildiz B., Yildiz H. (2015) "The Effect of Servant Leadership
on Psychological Ownership: The Moderator Role of
Perceived Organizational Support", Journal Of Global
Strategıc Management, Sayı: 9, 65-77.
- Yildiz B., Alpkan L., Ateş H., Sezen B. (2015) "Determinants
of Constructive Deviance: The Mediator Role of
Psychological Ownership", Internatıonal Busıness
Research, Sayı:8, 107-121.
- Zhu, H.,Chen, C. C., Li, X., & Zhou, Y. (2013) “From
Personal Relationship to Psychological Ownership: The
Importance of Manager–Owner Relationship Closeness
in Family Businesses”, Management and Organization
Review, 9(2): 295-318.