KADINLARIN YÖNETİMDEKİ BECERİLERİNE İLİŞKİN GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE BEYİN ARAŞTIRMALARI: KADINLAR YÖNETİMDE HAK ETTİĞİ STATÜYE SAHİP Mİ?

Bu çalışma, tarih boyunca kadının toplumsal yapıdan dışlanmasında öne çıkan beyin araştırmalarını incelemeyi ve daha çok kadının yönetim koltuğuna oturması gereken durumlara açıklık getirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla öncelikle beyin araştırmalarında kadına yönelik ayrımcılık yapan ve kadınları aşağılayan tarihsel tanımlar, günümüz beyin araştırmalarındaki gelişmeler bağlamında kadın ve erkek beynindeki biyolojik farklılıklar ve kadın beyninin ortaklaşa şekillendirdiği kültürel etki-evrim analiz edilmiştir. Geçmişteki ve günümüzdeki beyin araştırmaları, evrimi ve gelişimi sağlayan süreçler, temel veri niteliğindedir. Alan yazından elde edilen veriler, geçmişte gözlemlenen süreçler ve olaylar ile sürecin nasıl şekillendirildiği araştırılarak dolaylı gözleme dayalı nitel çalışma yapılmıştır. Olaylar ve olgular bir bütün olarak yorumlanmış ve betimlenmiştir. Kadına karşı ayrımcılık yapan beyin çalışmaları, kadının evrimde ve gelişmede oynadığı biyolojik ve toplumsal rol ve kadının toplumun ve yönetimin merkezine yerleştirilmesi temel konulardır. Araştırma sonucunda kadınların yönetimde yeterlilik açısından nasıl ayrımcılığa maruz kaldığı, kadınların evrimsel rolleri ve beyin kapasiteleri nedeniyle toplumun ve yönetimin öncüleri oldukları ortaya çıkmıştır.

BRAIN RESEARCH FROM PAST TO PRESENT ON THE SKILLS OF WOMEN IN MANAGEMENT: ARE WOMEN IN DESERVED STATUS IN MANAGEMENT?

This study aims at to search prominent brain studies that externalised women from communal system and set forth the situations that more women should take the management chair. Firstly, historical definitions that discriminate women and haul them down in brain research, biological dissimilarities in brains according to gender in today's brain research, and the cultural effect shaped by the female brain in co-evolution are analyzed. Brain research in past and today, processes that provide evolution and development, are the basic data investigated. A qualitative study grounds on indirect observation was conducted by probing the data from literature, the continuums and incidents observed in history, and how the continuum was shaped. Events and facts were interpreted and described in their entirety. Brain studies that discriminate against women, the biological and communal act played by women in evolution, development and fitting women at the hub of community and management are the issues that provide clues in the analysis. It is seen how women have been subject to to discrimination with regard to competency in management as a result. As a result it appears that women are the precursor of society and management due to their evolution roles and brain capacity.

___

  • Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 371-386.
  • Allen, L. S., & Gorski, R. A. (1991). Sexual dimorphism of the anterior commissure and massa intermedia of the human brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 312 (1), 97-104.
  • Allen, L. S., M. F. Richey, Y. M. Chai, & R. A. Gorski. 1991. Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being. Journal of Neuroscience, 11 (4), 933–42.
  • Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton Univ Pr.
  • Bannò, M., Filippi, E., & Trento, S. (2023). Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of management and governance, 27 (1), 181-251.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). The essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism. Newyork: Basic Books.
  • Becker, A. K. (2023). When men lose their animals, women gain power: Women and change in East Pokot, Kenya (Unpublished Phd thesis). Universität zu Köln, Faculty of Philosophy, Köln.
  • Berker, E. A., Berker, A. H., & Smith, A. (1986). Translation of Broca's 1865 report: Localization of speech in the third left frontal convolution. Archives of neurology, 43 (10), 1065-1072.
  • Billington, J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S., (2007). Cognitive style predicts entryinto physical sciences and humanities: Questionnaire and performance tests ofempathy and systemizing. Learning and Individual Differences, 17 (3), 260-268.
  • Borkenau, P., McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2013). Do men vary more than women in personality? A study in 51 cultures. Journal of research in personality, 47 (2), 135-144.
  • Boughman, J. W. (2001). Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature, 411 (6840), 944-948.
  • Broca, P. (1861). Sur le volume et la forme du cerveau suivant les individus et suivant les races. Hennuyer.
  • Broca, P. 1873. Sur les cranes de la caverne de I'Homme-Mort (Lozere). Revue d'Anthropologic, 2, 1-53.
  • Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24 (4), 428-442.
  • Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47 (2), 448-474.
  • Collado, P., A. Guillamón, A. Valencia, & S. Segovia. (1990). Sexual dimorphism in the bed nucleus of the accessory olfactory tract in the rat. Developmental Brain Research 56 (2), 263–268.
  • Cummings, M. E., Larkins-Ford, J., Reilly, C. R., Wong, R. Y., Ramsey, M., & Hofmann, H. A. (2008). Sexual and social stimuli elicit rapid and contrasting genomic responses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275 (1633), 393-402.
  • Darlington, C. L. (2009). The female brain. London: CRC Press.
  • Darwin, C. (1981). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. New Jersey: Princetone University Press.
  • De Lacoste-Utamsing, C., & Holloway, R. L. (1982). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science, 216 (4553), 1431-1432.
  • De Vries, G. J., Z. Wang, N. A. Bullock, & S. Numan. (1994). Sex differences in the effects of testosterone and its metabolites on vasopressin messenger RNA levels in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 14 (3), 1789–1794.
  • Delevich, K., Piekarski, D., & Wilbrecht, L. (2019). Neuroscience: sex hormones at work in the Neocortex. Current Biology, 29 (4), R122-R125.
  • Desjardins, J. K., Klausner, J. Q., & Fernald, R. D. (2010). Female genomic response to mate information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (49), 21176-21180.
  • Diamond, A. (1988). Abilities and neural mechanisms underlying AB performance. Child Development, 59 (2), 523-527.
  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6 (3-4), 169-200.
  • Endler, J. A., & Basolo, A. L. (1998). Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology &Evolution, 13 (10), 415-420.
  • Escorial, S., Román, F. J., Martínez, K., Burgaleta, M., Karama, S., & Colom, R. (2015). Sex differences in neocortical structure and cognitive performance: a surface-based morphometry study. Neuroimage, 104, 355-365.
  • Fahey, J. (2009). How your brain tells time. Disponıvel em, https://www. forbes. com/2009/10/14/circadian-rhythm-math-technologybreakthroughs-brain. html. Acesso em, 7.
  • Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. New York: Crown Publishers.
  • Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing, American Psychologist, 43 (2), 95–103.
  • Frost, J., Binder, J., Springer, J., Hammeke, T., Bellgowan, P., Rao, S. & Cox, R.(1999), Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from MRI. Brain, 122 (2), 199–208.
  • Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H., Duffy, D., & Ball, G. F. (2001). Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female song birds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. Journal of Neurobiology, 46 (1), 48-58.
  • Goldenfeld, N., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S., (2005). Empathizing and systemizingin males, females, and autism. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 2 (6), 338–345.
  • Goldstein, J. M., Kennedy, D. N., & Caviness Jr, V. S. (1999). Brain development, XI: sexual dimorphism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156 (3), 352.
  • Goleman, D. (2009). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Goleman, D. (2011). The brain and emotional intelligence: New insights. Regional Business, 94-95.
  • Gorski, R. A., J. H. Gordon, J. E. Shryne, & A. M. Southam. (1978). Evidence for amorphological sex difference within the medial preoptic area of the rat. Brain Research, 148 (2), 333-346.
  • Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. New york: Norton & Company.
  • Grueschow, M., Stenz, N., Thörn, H., Ehlert, U., Breckwoldt, J., Brodmann Maeder, M., Exadaktylos, A., Bingisser, R., Ruff, C.,& Kleim, B. (2021). Real-world stress resilience is associated with the responsivity of the locus coeruleus. Nature Communications, 12 (1), 1-17.
  • Guillamon, A., M. R. de Blas, & S. Segovia. (1988). Effects of sex steroids on thedevelopment of the locus coeruleus in the rat. Brain Research, 468 (2), 306-310.
  • Guldner, F. H. (1982). Sexual dimorphisms of axo-spine synapses and postsynapticdensity material in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the rat. Neuroscience Letters, 28 (2), 145-150.
  • Hartup, W.W., French, D.C., Laursen, B., Johnston, M.K. & Ogawa, J.R. (1993). Conflict and friendship relations in middle childhood: behavior in aclosed-field situation, Child Development, 64 (2), 445–54.
  • Hines, M., Chiu, L., McAdams, L. A., Bentler, P. M., & Lipcamon, J. (1992). Cognition and the corpus callosum: verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106 (1), 3.
  • Hoke, K. L., Ryan, M. J., & Wilczynski, W. (2005). Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (30), 10712-10717.
  • Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373-398.
  • Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., Dobrean, A., & Clinciu, A. I. (2016). Sex differences in intelligence: A multi-measure approach using nationally representative samples from Romania. Intelligence, 58, 54-61.
  • Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews, 72 (2), 283-327.
  • Johanson, D.C. & Edey, M. (1981). Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Jones, A. G., & Ratterman, N. L. (2009). Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (Supplement 1), 10001-10008.
  • Juraska, J. M., Fitch, J. M., & Washburne, D. L. (1989). The dendritic morphology of pyramidal neurons in the rat hippocampal CA3 area. II. Effects of gender and the environment. Brain Research, 479 (1), 115-119.
  • King, D. R., & Brenner, A. (2023). Introduction to Psychiatry. In Atlas of Psychiatry (pp. 1-28). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Klenke, K., (2017). Women in leadership: Contextual dynamics and boundaries. London: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Kochanska, G., Murray, K., Jacques, T.Y., Koenig, A.L. & Vandegeest, K.A. (1996). Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization, Child Development, 67 (2), 490–507.
  • Lancaster, J. B. (1975). Primate behavior and the emergence of human culture. Newyork: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
  • Leakey, R. (2008). The origin of humankind. Newyork: Basic Books.
  • Le Bon, G. (1879). Anatomical and mathematical researches into the laws of variations of brain volume and their relation to intelligence. trans. Robert K. Stevenson, Revue d’Anthropologie, 2 (2), 45-6.
  • Lee, R.B. (1968) “What Hunters Do for a Living, or, How to Make Out on Scarce Resources,” in R.B. Lee and I.DeVore (eds) Man the Hunter, Chicago: Aldine, 30-48.
  • Lehrman, D. S., & Friedman, M. (1969). Auditory stimulation of ovarian activity in the ring dove (Streptopelia risoria). Animal Behaviour, 17 (3), 494-497.
  • Lenroot, R. K., & Giedd, J. N. (2010). Sex differences in the adolescent brain. Brain and Cognition, 72 (1), 46-55.
  • Lindenfors, P., Nunn, C. L., & Barton, R. A. (2007). Primate brain architecture and selection in relation to sex. BMC Biology, 5 (1), 1-9.
  • Lui, J. H., Hansen, D. V., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2011). Development and evolution of the human neocortex. Cell, 146 (1), 18-36.
  • Lynch, K. S., & Wilczynski, W. (2006). Social regulation of plasma estradiol concentration in a female anuran. Hormones and Behavior, 50 (1), 101-106.
  • Maan, M. E., & Seehausen, O. (2010). Mechanisms of species divergence through visual adaptation and sexual selection: perspectives from a cichlid model system. Current Zoology, 56 (3), 285-299.
  • Mack, C. M., G. W. Boehm, A. S. Berrebi, & V. H. Denenberg (1995). Sex differencesin the distribution of axon types within the genu of the rat corpus callosum. Brain Research, 697 (1-2), 152-156.
  • Madsen, S. R. (2007). Developing leadership: Exploring childhoods of women university presidents. Journal of Educational Administration, 45 (1), 99-118
  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1998). German Ideology. Newyork: Prometheus Books.
  • Mather, George, (2012). The Visual Cortex. Sussex: School of Life Sciences, Falmer: University of Sussex.
  • Mill, J. S. (1971). On Liberty, Representive Government, the Subjection of Women. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Mizukami, S., M. Nishizuka, & Y. Arai. (1983). Sexual difference in nuclear volüme and its ontogeny in the rat amygdala. Experimental Neurology, 79 (2), 569-575.
  • Morbeck, M. E., Galloway, A., & Zihlman, A. (Eds.). (1997). The evolving female: A life history perspective. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Morton, S. G., & Combe, G. (1839). Crania Americana; or, a comparative view of the skulls of various aboriginal nations of North and South America: to which is prefixed an essay on the varieties of the human species. Philadelphia: J. Dobson; London: Simpkin, Marshall.
  • Morton, S. G., (1844). Observations on Egyptian ethnography, derived from anatomy, history and the monuments [separately reprinted subsequently as Crania Aegyptiaca, with tide above as subtitle]. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 9 (1), 93-159.
  • Ovtscharoff, W., B. Eusterschulte, R. Zienecker, I. Reisert, & C. Pilgrim. (1992). Sexdifferences in densities of dopaminergic fibers and GABAergic neurons inthe prenatal rat striatum. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 323 (2), 299-304.
  • Plaza, M., Gatignol, P., Leroy, M., & Duffau, H. (2009). Speaking without Broca's area after tumor resection. Neurocase, 15 (4), 294-310.
  • Pugh, K.R., Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Fulbright, R.K., Byrd, D. & Skudlarski,P.(1996), Auditory selective attention: an MRI investigation, Neuroimage, 4 (3), 159-173.
  • Pugh, K.R., Fletcher, J.M., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R.K., Constable, R.T., Bronen,R.A., Lacadie, C. & Gore, J.C. (1997), Predicting reading performance from neuro imaging profiles: the cerebral basis of phonological effects in printedword identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23 (2), 299-318.
  • Reid, S. N., & J. M. Juraska. (1992). Sex differences in the gross size of the rat neocortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 321 (3), 442-447.
  • Rippon, G. (2019). The Gendered Brain: The new neuroscience that shatters the myth of the female brain. London: Random House.
  • Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., ... & Deary, I. J. (2018). Sex differences in the adult human brain: evidence from 5216 UK biobank participants. Cerebral Cortex, 28 (8), 2959-2975.
  • Rosca, E., Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2020). Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120067.
  • Ryan, M. J. (1980). Female mate choice in a neotropical frog. Science, 209 (4455), 523-525.
  • Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilczynski, W., & Rand, A. S. (1990). Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature, 343 (6253), 66-67.
  • Romanes, G. J. (1887). Mental differences of men and women. Popular Science Monthly, 31 (7), 383-401.
  • Roof, R. L. (1993). The dentate gyrus is sexually dimorphic in prepubescent rats:testosterone plays a significant role. Brain Research, 610 (1), 148-151.
  • Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S., Pugh, K., Constables, R., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R., Bronen, R., Fletcher, J., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L. & Gore, J. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language, Nature, 373 (6515), 607-609.
  • Simerly, R. B., L. W. Swanson, & R. A. Gorski. (1985). The distribution of monoaminergiccells and fibers in a periventricular preoptic nucleus involved in the control of gonadotropin release: immunohistochemical evidence for a dopaminergic sexual dimorphism. Brain Research, 330 (1), 55-64.
  • Smith, P.M. (1985), Language, the Sexes and Society, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Somerville, L. H., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2010). Human bed nucleus of the stria terminalis indexes hypervigilant threat monitoring. Biological Psychiatry, 68 (5), 416-424.
  • Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: a brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82 (3), 171-177.
  • Swaab, D. F., & Hofman, M. A. (1995). Sexual differentiation of the human hypothalamus in relation to gender and sexual orientation. Trends in Neurosciences, 18 (6), 264-270.
  • Tanner, N., (1974). Matrifocality in Indonesia and Africa and among Black Americans. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (eds), Woman, Culture and Society (pp. 129-156). Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  • Tiedemann, Friedrich, (1836). On the Brain of the Negro, Compared With That of the European and the Orang-Outang. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 126, 497-527.
  • Topinard, P., (1888). Le poids de l'encephale d'apres les registres de Paul Broca. Memoires Societe d'Anthropologie Paris, 2 (3), 1-41.
  • Toulmin, S. (1977). Back to nature. New York: Review of Books, 9 June, 3-6.
  • Trivers, R. L. (2017). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
  • Vincent, A. (2009). Modern political ideologies. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wierenga, L. M., Sexton, J. A., Laake, P., Giedd, J. N., Tamnes, C. K., & Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics Study (2018). A key characteristic of sex differences in the developing brain: greater variability in brain structure of boys than girls. Cerebral Cortex, 28 (8), 2741-2751.
  • Wollstonecraft, M. (2014). Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Canada: Harper Collins.
  • Yager, L. M., Garcia, A. F., Wunsch, A. M., & Ferguson, S. M. (2015). The ins and outs of the striatum: role in drug addiction. Neuroscience, 301, 529-541.
  • Yoong, M. (2023). If your voice isn't accepted, does it mean you stop talking?: Exploring a woman leader’s reversal of postfeminist confidence discourses. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 38 (2), 200-214.
  • Zaidel, E. (2003). The Parallel Brain: the Cognitive Neuroscience of the Corpus Callosum. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2019). Women score higher than men in most leadership skills. Harvard Business Review, 92 (10), 86-93.
  • Zhou, J. N., Hofman, M. A., Gooren, L. J., & Swaab, D. F. (1995). A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality. Nature, 378 (6552), 68-70.
  • Zihlman, A. & Tanner, N. (1978) Gathering and the Hominid Adaptation, in L. Tigerand & H. Fowler (eds.), Female Hierarchies, (pp 163–194). Chicago: Beresford.
  • Zihlman, A.L. (1985) Australopithecus afarensis: Two Sexes or Two Species? in P.V. Tobias (ed.) Hominid Evolution: Past, Present, and Future, (pp: 213–220). New York: Alan R. Liss. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reconstruction_of_the_fossil_skeleton_of_%22Lucy%22_the_Australopithecus_afarensis.jpg retrieved by 30.06.2023