BREXIT: AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ HUKUKU VE BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇISINDAN ‘BUZDAĞININ GÖRÜNEN YÜZÜ’

Birleşik Krallık’da referandum sonucu Avrupa Birliği’nden çıkma kararının alınması ile birlikte Avrupa Birliği Hukuku açısından birçok sorun ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışma Avrupa Birliği Hukuku’nun dinamiklerini de dikkate alarak bu alanlarda ortaya çıkacak sorunlara dikkat çekmeyi ve sorunları ‘Ortak Ticaret Politikası’ ve yabancı mahkeme kararlarının tanınması ve tenfizine ilişkin ‘Tadil Edilmiş Brüksel I Tüzüğü’ üzerinden tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Brexit, Avrupa Birliği’nden Çıkma, Ortak Ticaret Politikası, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku

BREXIT: EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND THE ‘TIP OF THE ICEBERG’ FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM

‘European Withdrawal’ decision in the United Kingdom referandum result led to many uncertainties in the European Union Law. This paper by taking into account the dynamics of the European Union Law aims to point out the potential problems of this process. The scope of the discussion will be only on the ‘Common Trade Policy’ and the ‘Brusells I Recast Regulation’ on recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions.

Keywords:

Brexit, European Union Withdrawal, Common Trade Policy, European Union Law,

PDF

___

Allott, P. (24 Haziran 2016); ‘Fundamental Legal Aspects of UK Withdrawal from the EU: Eight Stages on the Way to a Steve Peers, What next after the UK vote to leave the EU?:
http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com.tr/2016/06/what-next-after-uk-vote-to-leave-eu.html
Burgstaller, M. Ve Zarowna, A. (Burgstaller ve Zarowna (a)), (2016), Possible Ramifications of the UK’s EU Referendum on Intra-and Extra-EU BITs, Journal of International Arbitration 33, Special Issue: 565-576
Burgstaller, M. ve Zarowna, A. (Burgstaller ve Zarowna (b)), (24 Ekim 2016), Why Brexit May be Good for UK Investors Abroad: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2016/10/24/brexit-may-good-uk-investors-abroad/
Croisant, G. (27 Ocak 2017), Towards the Uncertainties of a Hard Brexit: An Opportunity for International Arbitration:
http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2017/01/27/towards-the-uncertainties-of-a-hard-brexit-an-opportunity-for-international-arbitration/
Douglas-Scott, S. (16 Mayıs 2016), What Happens to ‘Acquired Rights’ in the Event of a Brexit?:
https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/05/16/sionaidh-douglas-scott-what-happens-to-acquired-rights-in-the-eventof-a-brexit/
Gehring W. M. (6 Mart 2016), Brexit and EU-UK Trade Relations with Third States:
http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com.tr/2016/03/brexit-and-eu-uk-trade-relations-with.html
Hadjiyianni, I. ve Spalding, A. (1 Temmuz 2016); Brexit Breakdown:
http://blogs.kcl.ac.uk/kslreuropeanlawblog/?p=1054#_ednref10
Hestermeyer, H. (2016), How Brexit Will Happen: A Brief Primer on European Union Law and Constitutional Law Questions Raised by Brexit, Journal of International Arbitration, 33, Special Issue, 429-450
Holmes, P. ve Rollo J. ve Winters, L. A. (Kasım 2016), Negotiating the UK’s Post-Brexit Trade Arrangements, National Institute Economic Review, No 238:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002795011623800112;
Karacan, P. (2014), Lizbon Andlaşması Sonrası Avrupa Birliği Yatırım Antlaşmaları, Legal Hukuk Dergisi, Rona Aybay’a Armağan-Özel Sayı, Aralık, 1421-1456
Kostakopoulou, D. (2016), Brexit, Voice and Loyalty: Reflections on Article 50 TEU, European Law Review, 41 (4), 487-489
Koutrakos, P. (2016), Negotiating International Trade Treaties After Brexit, European Law Review, 41(4), 475-478
MacGregor, A. (2016), Post-Brexit scenarios for UK competition policy and public enforcement: the EEA model v complete independence, International Trade Law & Regulation, s.82
Masterr, S. ve McRae, B. (2016), What Does Brexit Mean fort he Brussels Regime?, Journal of International Arbitration, 33, Special Issue, 483-500
Peers, S. (24 Hazran 2016), What next after the UK vote to leave the EU?:
http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com.tr/2016/06/what-next-after-uk-vote-to-leave-eu.htm
Tynes, S.D. ve Haugsdal, E. L. (2016), In, out or in between? The UK as a contracting party to the Agreement on the Eurupean Economic Area, European Law Review, 41 (5), 753-765