ETHICAL CONFLICTS EXPERIENCED IN AUDITING SECTOR: A FOCUS GROUP STUDY

Çalışanlar ve yöneticilerin veya örgütsel değerlerin arasındaki uyumsuzluklar, çalışanların yüksek olasılıkla etik çatışmalar yaşamasına neden olabilmektedir. Etik davranış, etik çatışmaları engellemek açısından önemlidir. Örgütteki etik davranışın belirleyicileri olarak bireysel ve örgütsel faktörler veya bireylerin kültürel eğilimleri etkin olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı iş hayatında bireyler tarafından yaşanan etik çatışmaları ve bu etik çatışmaların çözüm yöntemlerinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada kalitatif bir araştırma yöntemi olan odak grup çalışması kullanılmıştır. Odak grup çalışmasının katılımcılarını da denetim sektöründe çalışan bireyler oluşturmaktadır. Odak grup çalışması ile denetim sektöründe yaşanan etik çatışmalar ve etik çatışmaları çözüm yöntemleri analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları olarak, denetçilerin, iş yapısına bağlı olarak sıklıkla etik çatışmalar yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Denetçilerin durumlara bağlı olarak farklı çatışma çözüm yöntemleri kullandıkları da ortaya konmuştur. Çalışma, denetçi ve denetim sektöründe bulunan iş adamlarına etik çatışma konusunda bir bilgi sağlamaktadır. Denetim sektöründe bulunan bireylerin etik çatışmalar ile karşılaştıkların ne gibi çatışma çözüm yöntemi kullanabileceklerine dair de bir kaynak oluşturmaktadır

DENETİM SEKTÖRÜNDE YAŞANAN ETİK ÇATIŞMALAR: ODAK GRUP ÇALIŞMASI

In business life, employees can easily encounter with ethical conflicts due to the inconsistency between values of employees and their managers or organizational values. Ethical behavior is crucial in overcoming ethical conflicts. Individual and organizational factors, cultural orientations of individuals can be predictor of ethical behavior in an organization. The aim of this research is to find out the ethical conflicts experienced by individuals and how these ethical conflicts are resolved. The participants of the study consist of employees who are working in auditing. Their ethical conflict management styles are analyzed. Qualitative methods are deployed for the study. Focus group study is conducted to find out the ethical conflicts, which are experienced by auditors. Also, their ways of resolving the ethical conflicts are analyzed. The results indicated that auditors frequently experience ethical conflicts due to the content of their jobs and individuals prefer different resolution strategies in accordance with the conditions. The study guides managers and businessmen about ethical conflicts and conflict management styles especially in the field of accounting and auditing. Also, the study is the preliminary stage of another comprehensive study

___

  • Barach, J.A. (1985). The ethics of hardball. California Management Review, 27(2), 132-139.
  • Bartels, R. (1967). A Model for Ethics in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 20-26.
  • Baumhart, R. (1961). How ethical are businessmen? Harvard Business Review, 39(4), 16-19.
  • Bazerman, M.H. and Banaji, M.R. (2004). The social psychology of ordinary ethical failures. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 111-115.
  • Blake, R.R. and Mouton, J.S. (1964a). Managing intergroup conflict in industry. Houston, TX: Gulf.
  • Blake, R.R. and Mouton, J.S. (1964b). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
  • Bryant, S.M., Wier, B., and Stone, D.N. (2006). Accounting Stakeholders' Perceptions of Accountants' Job Performance and Motivation. http: //dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.912994.
  • Byrne, D. (2008). The oversubsidized periphery - who benefits? Radical Statistics, 97(2), 1-11.
  • Buller, P., Kohls, J. and Anderson, K. (1991). The Challenge of Global Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 767-775.
  • Butler, S. (1996). Child protection or professional self-preservation by the baby nurses?: Public health nurses and child protection in Ireland. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 303-314.
  • Carr, A.Z. (1970). Can an executive afford a conscience? Harvard Business Review, 48, 58-64.
  • Cressey, D.R. and Moore, C.A. (1983). Managerial values and corporate codes of ethics. California Management Review, 25(4), 53-77.
  • Derry, R. and Green, R.M. (1989). Ethical Theory in business ethics: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(7), 521-533.
  • Elsayed-Ekhouly, S.M. and Buda, R. (1996). Organizational conflict: A comparative analysis of conflict styles across cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(1), 71-81.
  • Fasching, D.J. (1981). A case for corporate and management ethics. California Management Review, 23(4), 62-76.
  • Ferrell, O.C. and Gresham L.G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96.
  • Ferrell, O.C., Gresham, L.G. and Fraedrich, J. (1989). A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55- 64.
  • Ferrell, O., Fraedrich, J. and Ferrell, L. (2002). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Follett, M.P. (1940). Constructive conflict. H.C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 30-49). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Ford, R. and Richardson, W. (1994). Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205-221.
  • Gino, F. and Margolis, J. (2011). Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 145-156.
  • Hegarty, W. and Sims, H. (1978). Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451- 457.
  • Hunt, S.D. and Vitell S.J. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16.
  • Jackall, R. (1983). Moral mazes: bureaucracy and managerial work, Harvard Business Review, 61, 118-130.
  • Jones, T.M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making By Individuals in Organizations: An Issue Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.
  • Kim, M.S. and Leung, T. (2000). A multicultural view of conflict management styles: Review and critical synthesis. M.E. Roloff &
  • G.D. Paulson (Eds.), Communication yearbook 23 (pp. 227-269). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative Research. Introducing Focus Groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299-302.
  • Kohls, J. and Buller, P. (1994). Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflict: Exploring Alternative Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(1), 31-38.
  • Krueger, R.A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Langford, J. and McDonagh, D. (2003). Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development. Taylor and Francis. Leung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19(1), 125-136
  • Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. P. E. Christopher & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial organizational psychology (pp. 640-675). San Francisco, CA: New Lexington.
  • Lodge, G.C. (1977). Ethics and the new ideology: Can business adjust? Management Review, 66(7), 10-19.
  • McCabe, D.L., Treviño, L.K. and Butterfield, K.D. (1996). The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(4), 461-476.
  • Mosser, M.R. (1988). Ethical Conflict at Work: A Critique of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(5), 381-387.
  • Rahim, M.A. (1983). Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory – II. Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Rahim, M.A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflic t. Academy of Management, 26(2), 368­376.
  • Rahim, M.A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206-235.
  • Rahim, M.A. and Magner, N.R. (1994). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Rahim organizational conflict intventory II. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 35-38.
  • Rahim, M.A. and Magner, N.R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122-132.
  • Saul, G.K. (1981). Business ethics: where are we going? Academy of Business, 6(2), 269-276.
  • Sims, R.R. (1992). The Challange of Ethical Behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 505-513.
  • Sim, J. and Snell, J. (1996). Focus groups in physiotherapy evaluation and research. Physiotherapy, 82, 189-198.
  • Singhapakdi, A. and Vitell, S. (1990). Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing, 10(1), 4-18.
  • Schwepker, C.H. Jr., Ferrell, O.C. and Ingram, T.N. (1997). The influence of ethical climate and ethical conflict on role stress in sales force. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 99-108.
  • Staubus, G.J. (2005). Ethics Failures in Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(1), 5-15.
  • Stead, W.E., Worrell, D.L., Spalding, J.B. and Stead, J.G. (1987). Unethical Decisions: Socially Learned Behaviors. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2(1), 105-115.
  • Stead, W.E., Worrell, D.L., Stead, J.G. (1990). An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 233-242.
  • Thomas, K.W. (1992). Conflict and Conflict Management: Reflections and Update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3) Special Issue, 265-274.
  • Thomas, K.W. and Kilmann, R. (1978). Comparison of four instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psychological Report, 42, 1139-1145.
  • Ting­Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face­negotiation theory. Y.Y. Kim & W.B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp.213-235). Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Trevino, L.K. (1986). Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A PersonSituation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617.
  • Trevino, L.K., Butterfield, K.D. and McCabe, D.L. (1998). The Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447-476.
  • Toffler, B.L. (1968). Tough Choices: Managers Talk Ethics. New York, US: Wiley.
  • Van de Vliert, E. and Kabanoff B. (1990). Toward theory-based measures of conflict management. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 199-209.
  • Vitell, S.J. and Ho, F.N. (1997). Ethical Decision Making in Marketing: A synthesis and evaluation of scales measuring the various components of decision making in ethical situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(7), 699-717.
  • Vitell, S., Festervand, T. and Dickerson, E.B. (2000). Ethical Problems, Conflicts and Beliefs of Small Business Entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 28 (1), 15-24.
  • Wimbush, J.C. and Shepard, J.M. (1994). Toward an understanding of the ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637-647.
  • Zaptcioglu Celikdemir, D. (2014). The Impact of Culture on Ethical Conflict Management (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.