Saussure Dilbilimi: Kaynakları ve Yöntem Sorunu

Anahtar Kelimeler:

metodoloji

This article has two main aims: introducing the Turkish reader to the studies and arguments on Saussure's philosophical as well as linguistic sources, on the one hand, and proposing a supplementary methodological point of view, on the other. After a brief summary of the works on the subject, it details the historiographical method elaborated by Koerner and suggests that it neglects explaining 'indirect relations' - that is, evident textual parallelism, but lack of historical evidence - for example, two cases first remarked by Benveniste, nearly forty years ago: George Boole and Paul Valery. This article argues that such parallelisms can be traced back to certain common sources: in this case, successively, Cournot and Breal, and, ultimately, Condillac.

Keywords:

methodology,

___

Aarsleff, H. (1979). Taine: Son importance pour Saussure et le structuralisme. Romantisme,25-26,35-47.

. (1981). Breal, la semantique et Saussure. Histoire, Epistemologie, Langage,III(2).

. (1982). Condillac, Taine et Saussure. Condillac et les problemes du langage,165-174. Textes recueillis par J. Sgard. Paris-Geneve: Slatkine.

Andresen, J. (1983). Signs and systems in Condillac and Saussure. Semiotica, 44. 259-281.

Auroux, S. (1985). Deux hypotheses sur Toriğine de la conception saussurienne de la valeur linguistique. Travaux de linguistique et de litterature, XIII(1), 295-299.

Barthes, R. (1993). [1985]. Göstergebilimsel Serüven. (Çev. Mehmet Rifat-Sema Rifat).İstanbul: YKY.

Benveniste, E. (ed.) (1964). Lettres de Ferdinand de Saussure â Antoine Meillet. CFS, 21,91-135.

Boole, G. (1958). [1854]. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. New York: Dover Publications.

Bouquet, S. (1998). Les deux paradigmes editoriaux de la linguistique generale de Ferdinand de Saussure. CFS, 51, 187-202.

Buyssens, E. (1961). Origine de la linguistique synchronise de Saussure. CFS, 18, 17-33.

Chervel, A. (1979). Le debat sur l'arbitraire du signe au XIXe siecle. Romantisme, 25-26, 3-33.

Condillac (2002). [1746]. Essai sur I'origine des connaissances humaines. Presente par A.Bertrand. Paris: Librairie Philosphique J. Vrin.

Coseriu, E. (1968). L 'Arbitraire du signe. Zur Spatgeschichte einesariztotelischen Begriffes.Arch. f. das Gesch. des neu. Spr., Vol. 204.

Culler, J. (1985). Saussure. Çev. Nihal Akbulut. İstanbul: Afa Yayınları.

De Palo, M. (1999). II 'segno linguistic»' da Breal a Saussure. Studi FilosificiJXII, 231-260.

Fehr J. (2000). Saussure entre linguistique et semiologie. Paris: PUF.

Godel, R. (1957). Sources,manuscrites. Geneve-Paris: Librarie Droz.

Hutton, C. M.-Joseph, J. E. (1998). Back to Blavatsky: the impact of theosophy on modern linguistics. Language and Communication, 18, 181-204.

Jabobson, R. (1971). Selected Writings. Lahey: Mouton.

Joseph, J. E. (1988). Saussure's Meeting with Whitney, Berlin, 1879. CFS, 42, 205-215. . (1996). Undoubtedly a powerful influence: Victor Henry's Antnomies linguistiques (1896), with annotated translation of the first chapter. Language and Communication, 16, 117-144.

Joseph, J. E. (2000). Language and 'psychological race': Leopold de Saussure on French in Indochina. Language and Communication, 20, 29-53.

Kılıç, S. (2002). Saussure dilbiliminin felsefi kaynakları üstüne bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi.

Koerner, E. F. K. (1973). Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and Development of his Linguistic Thought in Western Studies of Language. Vieweg. Braunsweig.

. (1995). Saussure and the question of the sources of his linguistic theory.Professing Linguistic Historiography. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins Publishing Co.

Kukenheim, L. (1966). Esquisse historique de la linguistique française et de ses rapports avec la linguistique generale. Leiden: Presses Universitaires de Leiden.

Lanteri-Laura, G. (2000). Geneologie du structuralisme. Evolution pschiatrique, 65, 477-97.

Mounin, G. (1967). Histoire de la linguistique. Paris: PUF.

Normand, C.(1970). L'arbitraire du signe comme phenomene de deplacement. Dialectiques,1(2), 109-126.

Robins, R. H. (1967). A Sho-i History of Linguistics. Londra: Longman.

Saussure, F. d. (1985). [1916]. Genel Dilbilim Dersleri. (Çev. Berke Vardar). Ankara: Bireyve Toplum Yayınları.

. (2002). Ecrits de linguistique generale, ed. Simon Bouquet ve Rudolf Engler.Paris: Editions Gallimard. (Metinde Ecrits kısaltması kullanıldı.)

. (1968-74). Cours de Hnguistique generale I-II. Edition critique par R. Engler.Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz. (Metinde alışılageldiği üzere CLG/E kısaltması kullanıldı.)

Swiggers, P. (1982). La semiotique de Condillac ou la pensee dans la pensee. Condillac et les problemes dü langage, 221-242. Textes recueillis par J. Sgard. Paris-Geneve:Slatkine.

Voloşinov, V. N. (2001). [1929]. Marksizm ve Dil Felsefesi. (Çev. Mehmet Küçük). İstanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları.

Washabaugh, W. (1974). Saussure, Durkheim and sociolinguistic theory. Archivum Linguisticum, Vol. 5.