Sakrokoksigeal pilonidal sinus eksizyonu sonrası yara iyileşmesinde sıcak su banyosunun etkinliği

Bu çalışmada sakrokoksigeal pilonidal sinüsler (SPS)’de primer eksizyon ve marsupializasyon sonrası yara iyileşmesinde sıcak su oturma banyosu ve povidin-iodin pansumanının etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. SPS nedeni başvuran 36 hastaya primer eksizyon ve marsupiyalizasyon yapıldı ve postoperatif dönemde randomize prospektif olarak 18 hastaya günde iki kez sıcak su oturma banyosu (Grup 1), diğer 18 hastaya (Grup 2) iki günde bir povidon-iodinle pansuman yapıldı. Gruplar arasında yara iyileşme hızları (uzunluk, genişlik, derinlik), komplikasyon, nüks ve kapanma süreleri karşılaştırıldı. Ortalama hasta yaşları; Grup 1’de 25.5 (15-45) ve Grup 2’de 22.6 (16-37) idi. Postoperatif 1. gün; Grup 1’in ortalama yara uzunluğu 3.85 cm, ortalama yara genişliği 1.77 cm, ortalama yara derinliği 1.47 cm iken, Grup 2’de sırasıyla 3.68 cm, 1.5 cm ve 1.37 cm’di. Ortalama yara kapanma süreleri, Grup 1’de 38.7 (27-59) gün, Grup 2’de 40.8 (23-62) gündü. Değerlendirmede gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı (P>0.05). Sıcak su oturma banyosu her ne kadar istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark görülmemiş olsada yara iyileşmesinde olumlu yönde etkileyen, pratik alternatif bir tedavi yöntemi olabilir.

The effectiveness of the hot water baths on the wound healing after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus

The aim of this study was to compare hot water baths with “dressing a wound with povidin-iodin” at wound healing after primer excision of sacrococciygeal pilonidal sinus (SPS). Thirty six patients with SPS are randomly treated prospective by primary excision and marsupialization. During postoperative period, 18 patients (Group 1) are followed with hot-water and other 18 patients (Group 2) with povidine-iodine dressing. Healing periods (length, wideness and deepness), complications, recurrence and wound closure times between the two groups analyzed. Average patient ages are 25.5(15-45) in group 1 and 22.6(16-37) in group 2. On the postoperative first day, mean wound lengths are 3.85 cm and 3.68 cm, mean wound broadness are 1.77 cm and 1.5 cm and mean wound deepness are 1.47 cm and 1.37 cm in order for first and second groups. Wound closure times are 38.7 (27-59) and 40.8 (23-62) days for first and second groups. There is no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). In conclusion, hot water baths may be a alternative treatment method contributing positively to wound healing.

___

  • 1. Aydede H, Erhan Y, Sakarya A, Kumkumoglu Y. Comparison of three methods in surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 362-4.
  • 2. Hodges RM. Pilonidal sinüs. Boston Med Surg J 1880; 103: 485-6.
  • 3. Weston SD, Schlachter IS. Pilonidal cyst of the anal canal: a case report. Dis Colon Rectum 1963; 6: 139-41.
  • 4. Kooistra HP. Pilonidal Sinus: a rewiev of the literature and report of 350 cases. Am J Surg 1942; 55: 3-17.
  • 5. Stone HB. The origin of Pilonidal Sinus. Ann Surg 1931; 94: 311-15.
  • 6. Lord PH. Anorectal Problems: etiology of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 1975; 18: 661-4.
  • 7. Bascom J. Pilonidal disese. Origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery 1980; 87: 567-72.
  • 8. Powell KR, Cherry JD, Hougen TJ, Blinderman EE, et al. A prospective search for congenital dermal abnormalities of the craniospinal axis. J Peadiatr 1975; 87: 744-50.
  • 9. Franckowiak J. The etiology of Pilonidal Sinus. Proc R Soc Med 1960;4:752-5.
  • 10. Karydakis GE: Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. ANZ J Surg 1992;62: 385-9.
  • 11. Oldman JB. Surgery of sacrococcygeal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 1970; 18:179-86.
  • 12. Franckowiak J, Jackman RJ. The etiology of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 1962; 5: 28-36.
  • 13. Bender O. Pilonidal sinüs tedavisinde Limberg Flep. Cerrahi Tıp Bülteni 1993; 2: 17-20
  • 14. Manterola C, Barroso M, Araya JC, Fonseca L. Pilonidal disease: 25 cases treated by the Dofourmentel technigue. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 649-52.
  • 15. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10: 39-42.
  • 16. Eftaiha M, Abracian H. The dilemma of pilonidal disease: surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1977; 20: 279-86.
  • 17. Rainsbury RM, Southam JA. Radical surgery for pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Eng 1982; 64: 339-41.
  • 18. Da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst, cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 42: 1146-56.
  • 19. Sodenna K, Nesvik I, Anderse E, Soreide JA. Recurrent pilonidal sinus after excision with closed or open treatment: final result of a randomised trial. Eur Surg 1996; 162:237-40.