Pankreas Kanseri Tanılı Hastalarımızda Prognostik Faktörlerin İncelenmesi

Amaç: Pankreas kanseri oldukça kötü prognozlu bir hastalık olup, insidansı giderek artmaktadır. Bu hastalıkta birden fazla prognostik belirteç bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmadaki amaç kliniğimizde pankreas kanseri tanısı alan hastaların yaşam süresini etkileyen prognostik faktörleri saptamaktı. Yöntemler: Kliniğimize Ocak 2011-Haziran 2020 tarihleri arasında başvuran ve pankreas kanseri tanısı konulan 127 hastanın demografik ve klinik özellikleri, laboratuvar sonuçları, kontrastlı abdomen tomografisi bulguları ve tedavilere cevapları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 85’i (%67) erkek 42’si (%33) kadın olup, yaş ortalaması 62,6±12,5 (27-90) yıl, ortalama sağ kalma süresi 11,6±1,3 ay; 1 yıllık ortalama sağ kalım oranı %31 ve 5 yıllık ortalama sağ kalım oranı %0,9 idi. Pankreas kanseri prognozu ile cinsiyet, tümör çapı, tümör lokalizasyonu, DM varlığı, patolojik LAP varlığı, vasküler invazyon, kemoterapi alınması, serum CA 19-9 ve CA125 seviyesi arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanmazken, ileri yaş (p=0.01), karaciğer metastazı (P=0.016) ve yüksek serum CEA düzeyinin (p=0.013) kötü prognostik faktör ve cerrahi rezeksiyon yapılmasının (p=0.039) iyi prognostik faktör olduğu saptandı. Sonuç: Pankreas kanseri tedavisi sırasında hastalığın prognozunu etkileyen faktörlerin göz önünde bulundurulması faydalı olabilir.

The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results

Objectives: In this study, the relationship of cord blood Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) with neonatal diseases was investigated. Methods: NGAL levels were measured in the cord blood of 180 babies born between 2015 and 2016. Patients were classified according to maternal diseases, neonatal diseases and demographic characteristics. Obtained data were compared with cord blood NGAL levels. Results: In our study, the mean NGAL levels were 1283.99 ng/mL in boys and 1306.52 ng/mL in girls. Umbilical cord blood NGAL levels of infants diagnosed with intrauterine growth retardation (1913.4±2833.5 ng/mL) and prolonged premature rupture of membranes (2594.2±2037.1 ng/mL) were found to be statistically high (p0.05). Conclusions: Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin, may be useful as a diagnostic biomarker in the evaluation of maternal and neonatal diseases. However, studies on larger patient populations are needed.

___

  • 1. Haddock G. Carter DC. Aetiologyof pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 1159-66.
  • 2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan; 60: 277–300.
  • 3. M. Gultekin, G. Boztas, E. Utku Simsek, ve ark. 2013 yılı Türkiye Kanser İstatistikleri. Ankara; 2016.
  • 4. Artinyan A, Soriano PA, Prendergast C, et al. The anatomic location of pancreatic cancer is a prognostic factor for survival. HPB (Oxford). 2008 Jan; 10: 371–6.
  • 5. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan; 59: 225–49.
  • 6. Wang H, Liu J, Xia G, et al. Survival of pancreatic cancer patients is negatively correlated with age at diagnosis: a population-based retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2020; 10:7048. 10.1038/s41598-020- 64068-3.
  • 7. Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, et al. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Sep; 63: 318-48.
  • 8. Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and the risk of pancreatic cancer. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Oct 28; 156: 2255– 60.
  • 9. Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of metaanalytical studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb; 44: 186–98.
  • 10. Fernandez E, La Vecchia C, Decarli A, Attributable risks for pancreatic cancer in nothern Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers prev. 1996; 5; 23-27.
  • 11. Rashleigh-Belcher HJ, Russell RC, Lees WR. Cutaneous seeding of pancreatic carcinoma by fineneedle aspiration biopsy. Br J Radiol. 1986 Feb;59(698):182–3.
  • 12. Margeret A. Tempero, Mokenge P. Malafa, Horacio Asbun, Stephen W. Behrman, Al B. Benson CC. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. 2. 2015.
  • 13. Al-Haddad M, Martin JK, Nguyen J, et al. Vascular resection and reconstruction for pancreatic malignancy: a single center survival study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Sep; 11: 1168–74.
  • 14. Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985 Aug; 120: 899–903.
  • 15. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 18; 350: 1200–10.
  • 16. Yang R, Cheung MC, Byrne MM, et al. Survival effects of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2010 Jan; 145: 49–56.
  • 17. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Jan 17; 297: 267–77.
  • 18. Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W, et al. Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial-- SAKK 44/00- CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1; 26: 3695–701.
  • 19. Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20; 27: 5513–8.
  • 20. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2012 - SEER Statistics. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD.
  • 21. Huxley R, Ansary-Moghaddam A, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Barzi F, Woodward M. Type-II diabetes and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 36 studies. British journal of cancer. 2005; 92: 2076–83.
  • 22. Chari ST, Leibson CL, Rabe KG, Ransom J, de AM, Petersen GM. Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129: 504–11.
  • 23. Yamamoto T, Yagi S, Kinoshita H, et al. Long-term survival after resection of pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7; 21: 262-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.262.
  • 24. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas -616 patients: Results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 567- 79.
  • 25. Lillemoe KD. Current management of pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 1995;221:133-48.
  • 26. Uçar G, Ergün Y, Açıkgöz Y, ve ark. Opere Pankreas Adenokanserli Hastalarda Kemoterapiye Kemoradyoterapi Eklemenin Katkısı. Dicle Tıp Dergisi / Dicle Med J (2020) 47: 897-902.
  • 27. Helvacı K, Üyetürk Ü, Sönmez Ö et al. Evaluation Of Demographic And Clinicopathological Characteristics Of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients. Acta Oncol Turc2016; 49: 91-101.
  • 28. Garcea G, Dennison AR, Pattenden CJ, et al. (2008) Survival following curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A systematic review of the literature. JOP 9: 99-132.
  • 29. Lianyuan T, Deyu L, Haibo Y, Yadong D, Guanjing T. Clinical features and prognostic factors of elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Feb 26; 13: 7133-46.
  • 30. W. Hartwig, O. Strobel, U. Hinz, et al. Werner CA19-9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy Ann. Surg. Oncol., 20 (7) (2013), pp. 2188- 96.
  • 31. Gu YL, Lan Ch, Pei H, et al. Applicative value of serum CA19-9, CEA, CA125 and CA242 in diagnosis and prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16: 6569–73..
  • 32. Nurmi AM, Mustonen HK, Stenman UH, Seppänen HE, Haglund CH. Combining CRP and CA19-9 in a novel prognostic score in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 781.
Dicle Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-2945
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1963
  • Yayıncı: Cahfer GÜLOĞLU
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Karpal Tünel Sendromunun Şiddeti İle Nötrofil/Lenfosit ve Platelet/Lenfosit Oranının Arasındakı İlişki

Zahide MAİL GÜRKAN, Aygül TANTİK PAK, Yıldızhan ŞENGÜL, İlker ÖZTÜRK

Oral Antidiyabetik Kullanımının, Farklılaşmış 3T3-L1 Hücrelerinde Adipogenez Metabolizmasında Görev Alan VDR, SIRT1, Apelin ve FOXO1 Gen Anlatım Seviyelerine Etkileri

Meliha KOLDEMİR GÜNDÜZ, Mehtap ÇEVİK, Penbe ÇAĞATAY, Çavlan ÇİFTÇİ, Belgin SÜSLEYİCİ

Evaluation of Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Activity of Ganoderma Lucidum In Rat Bone Marrow Induced By Lipopolysaccharide

Münevver BARAN, Nazmiye BİTGEN, Kübra Tuğçe KALKAN, Özge GÖKTEPE, Salih VAROL, Arzu YAY

hCG Günü Serum Estradiol ve Progesteron Değerleri, Antagonist Protokollü IVF-ICSI Sikluslarında Tedavi Başarısını Etkiler mi?

Uğur DEĞER, Yunus ÇAVUŞ, Gülcan OKUTUCU, Nurullah PEKER

Prognostic Significance of Monocyte to High-density Lipoprotein Ratio in Patients With Chronic Coronary Artery Occlusion

Muhammed DEMİR, Mehmet ÖZBEK, Adem AKTAN, Tuncay GÜZEL, Burhan ASLAN, Hakkı ŞİMŞEK

Kardiyolojide Yeni Nesil Dizileme Uygulamaları

Orhan GÖRÜKMEZ

Evaluation of Demographic and Clinical Data of Herpes Zoster Patients Admitted To Tertiary Referral Dermatology Clinic During COVID-19 Pandemic

Ayse Nilhan ATSÜ, Görkem ORUC ADALI, Nazlı CAF, Zafer TÜRKOGLU

Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Tuncay GÜNDÜZ, Gonca ÖZCAN, Arman ÇAKAR, Halil İbrahim AKÇAY, Ayşe Nur ÖZDAĞ ACARLI, Mefküre ERAKSOY, Murat KÜRTÜNCÜ

Rekürren İskemik İnme / Geçici İskemik Atak ile Atriyal Fibrilasyon İlişkisi

Sevda DİKER, Anıl TANBUROĞLU

Pankreas Kanseri Tanılı Hastalarımızda Prognostik Faktörlerin İncelenmesi

Ramazan YOLAÇAN, Ercan YİĞİT, Ümit KARABULUT, Ali ÜZEL, Feyzullah UÇMAK, Muhsin KAYA