Akut anteriyor miyokard infarktüsünde sol atriyal volüm değişiklikleri

Akut miyokard infarktüsü sonrası sol atriyal volümünün prognostik önemi bilinmektedir. Bu çalışma akut anteriyor miyokard infarktüsü (AMİ) geçirip sol ventrikül sistolik fonksiyonları kısmen korunmuş olan hastaların sol atriyal volüm değişiklikleri ve bu değişikliklerin diyastolik parametrelerle olan ilişkisini araştırmak amacıyla planlandı. Çalışmaya anteriyor AMİ'li 34 hasta ile aynı yaş ve cinsiyet ile uyumlu toplam 20 kontrol vakası alındı. Standart ekokardiyografik ölçümlere ek olarak atriyal volüm ölçümleri ve doku doppler analizi yapıldı. Kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında, sol atriyum maksimal volüm (43.6±8.8 ve 38.7±5.3 (p

Atrial volume changes in anterior myocardial infarction

Prognostic value of left atrial volume after acute myocardial infarction (AMI)is well known. This study was planned to evaluate left atrial volume changes and the effect of these changes on diastolic parameters in patients with anterior myocardial infarction with preserved ejection fraction. Thirty-four consecutive patients with anterior AMI were enrolled in this study along with sex and age matched 20 normal controls. In addition, to the standard echocardiographic evaluation, left atrial (LA) volume measurements and tissue doppler analysis were done. Left atrial maximal volume (43.6±8.8 vs 38.7±5.3 ml; p<0.05) and volume p (32±7.6 and 24.1±4.9 ml; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in AMI group than normals. However, minimal volume (19.5±6.7 vs 16.8±5.6 ml; p>0.05) and total emptying volume (24.1±4.1 vs 22.1±2.9; p>0.05) were not significant between two groups. In AMI group, passive emptying volume and its fraction was lower, although active emptying volume and its fraction was higher than controls. At the same time pulmonary vein systolic and diastolic flows were lower in AMI group. There was a significant relationship between left ventricular diastolic parameters (mitral E/A and mitral tissue EVA') and LA active emptying volume in AMI group ( r= -0,35 and r=-0,36p<0,05, respectively). Our study suggested that left atrial volume changes are significant in the AMI. In addition, these changes are parallel to diastolic dysfunction. Left atrial volume changes may be used more confidently compared to mitral valve's diastolic parameters that are variable.

___

  • 1. Rossi A, Cicoira M, Zanolla L, ve ark. Determinants and prognostic value of left atrial volume in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1425–1430.
  • 2. Rossi A, Tomaino M, Golia G, ve ark. Usefulness of left atrial size in predicting postoperative symptomatic improvement in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:567–570.
  • 3. Reed D, Abbott RD, Smucker ML, Kaul S. Prediction of outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation. The importance of left atrial size. Circulation 1991;84:23–34.
  • 4. Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, ve ark. Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003;107:2207–2212.
  • 5. Mandinov L, Eberli FR, Seiler C, Hess OM. Diastolic heart failure. Cardiovascular Research 2000;45:813-25
  • 6. Choong CY, Hermann HC, Weymann AE, Fifer MA. Preload dependence of Doppler-derived indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:800-8
  • 7. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-83.
  • 8. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study.J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:426-40.
  • 9. Nishimura RA, Housmans PR, Hatle LK, Tajik AJ. Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part I. Physiologic and pathophysiologic features. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 71-81.
  • 10. Matsuda Y, Toma Y, Ogawa H ve ark. lmportance of left atrial function in patients with myocardial infarction. Circulation 1983; 67: 566-71.
  • 11. Matsuzaki M, Tamitani M, Toma Y ve ark. Mechanism of augmented left alrial pump function in myocardial infarction and essential hypertension evaluated by left atrial pressuredimiension relation. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:1121-6.
  • 12. Rahimtoola SH, Ehsani A, Sinno MZ ve ark. Left atrial transport function in myocardial infarction. Importance of isa booster pump function. Am J Med 1975; 59:686-94.
  • 13. Sigwart U, Grbic M, Goy J, Kappenberger L. Left atrial function in acute transient left ventricular ischemia produced during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 282-6.
  • 14. Leistad E, Aksnes G, Verburg E, Christensen G. Atrial contractile dysfunction after short-term atrial fibrillation is reduced by verapamil but increased by BAY K8644. Circulation 1996; 93: 1747-54.
  • 15. Dernellis JM, Vyssoulis GP, Zacharoulis AA, Toutouzas PK. Effects of antihypertensive therapy on left atrial function. J Hum Hypertens 1996; 10: 789-94.
  • 16. Basnight MA, Gonzalez MS, Kershenovich SC, Appleton CP. Pulmonary venous flow velocity: relation to hemodynamics, mitral flow velocity and left atrial volume,and ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991;4:547–58.
  • 17. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, ve ark. Prediction of risk for first age-related cardiovascular events in an elderly population: the incremental value of echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1199– 205.
  • 18. Beinart R, Boyko V, Schwammenthal E, ve ark. Long-term prognostic significance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:327–34
  • 19. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation 1990;81: 1161–1172.
  • 20. Burton AC. The importance of the shape and size of the heart. Am Heart J 1957;54:801–810.
  • 21. Theroux P, Ross J Jr, Franklin D ve ark. Regional myocardial function and dimensions early and late after myocardial infarction in the unanesthetized dog. Circ Res 1977;40:158–165
  • 22. Popescu BA, Macor F, Antonini- Canterin F, Left Atrium Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction (Results of the GISSI-3 Echo Substudy) Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1156–59
  • 23. Qirko S, Tase M, Lushnjari V, Sinjari T. Left atrial contractility function in hypertension. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1996; 89:1003-7.
  • 24. Kono T, Sabbah HN, Rostman H, Alam M, Stein PD, Goldstein S. Left atrial contribution to ventricular tilling during the course of evolving heart failure. Circulation 1992; 86: 1317-22
  • 25. Dernellis JM, Vyssoulis GP, Zacharoulis AA, Toutouzas PK. Acute changes of left atrial distensibility in congestive heart failure. Clin Cardiol 1998; 21: 28-32.
  • 26. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1284–89.
  • 27. Ito T, Suwa M, Kobashi A ve ark. Reversible left atrial dysfunction possibly due to afterload mismatch in patients with left ventrikular dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 274-79.
  • 28. Poulsen SH, Jensen SE, Gotzsche O, Egstrup K. Evaluation and prognostic significance of left ventricular diastolic function assessed by Doppler echocardiography in the early phase of a first acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1882–9.