Nurdan Eren BODUR, Behçet ÇOŞAR, Mehmet ERDEM

İnfertil Çiftlerde Evlilik Uyumunun Demografik ve Klinik Değişkenlerle İlişkisi

Bu araştırmada, infertil çiftlerin evlilik uyumlarının klinik değişkenler üzerine olan etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya 104 infertil çift ve kontrol grubu olarak sağlıklı ve çocuklu 44 çift dahil edilmiştir. Kontrol grubuna HAD (Hastane anksiyete depresyon), ÇBASDÖ (çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeği) ve ÇUÖ (çiftler uyum ölçeği) ve infertil grubuna bu ölçeklere ek olarak FSE (Fertilite Sorun Envanteri) verilmiştir. İnfertilite grubu kadınlar, infertil erkeklere göre daha fazla evlilik uyumunda düşme bildirseler de bu kontrol grubundan farklı değildir. Genel olarak, infertil çiftlerde evlilik uyumu arttıkça depresyon ve anksiyete düzeyinin düştüğü, aileden algılanan sosyal desteğin evlilik uyumu üzerine olumlu etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlar infertil çiftlerde psikososyal sorunların bu alana özgü ölçeklerle değerlendirilmesinin önemine, çiftlere sağlanacak psikososyal desteğin ve bu hizmet içinde sosyal destek sistemlerinin harekete geçirilmesinin özellikle de erkekler üzerindeki olumlu etkilerinin olabileceğine dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

İnfertilite, çift uyumu, fertilite sorunu

The relationship between dyadic adjustment with demographic and clinical variables in infertile couples

In this study it was aimed to assess and evaluate the impact of the levels of dyadic adjustment in infertile couples on stress related with infertility and marital adjustment. The study included 104 couples with primary or secondary infertility and 44 healthy couples with children for the control group. Control group was given the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Infertile group was given HADS, DAS, MSPSS and also Fertility Problem Inventory. Women in infertile couples reported greater psychological symptoms and more decreased marital adjustment than men in infertile couples; but the couples did not show any significant difference with those in control groups regarding these parameters. It was determined that, in general, while marital adjustment in infertile couples increases, depression and anxiety levels decrease. These results showed that psychosocial problems in infertile couples should be evaluated with specific scales. Psychosocial support which will be given to infertile couples and motivating social support systems while providing this service would have positive effects especially on men.

Keywords:

Fertility, dyadic adjustment, fertility problem,

PDF

___

Abbey A, Halman LJ, Andrews FM. Psychosocial, treatment and demographic predictors of the stress associated with infertility. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57: 122
Akçin FG. İnfertil Çiftlerin Psikiyatrik Semptomlar, Cinsel İşlev Bozukluğu, Baş Etme Düzenekleri, Cinsiyet Rolü Algıları Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Uzmanlık Tezi. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi; 2005.
Andrews FM. Abbey A, Halman LJ. Is fertilityproblem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57: 1247Aydemir Ö, Güvenir T, Küey L, Kültür S. Hastane
Anksiyete Depresyon Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Derg. 1987; 8: 280-7.
Bagheri M. Coping the stress of infertility treatment in females and males entering in vitro fertilization treatment.2006 http://www.gendermedicine.com/1st/ pospres.asp 96.
Black LD, Delgado JD, Turek PJ. The infertility issue :Who says men don’t talk? Ferti Steril. 2001; 76:1
Bowman ML: Coping efforts and marital satisfaction: measuring marital coping and its correlates. J Marriage Fam. 1990; 52: 463-75.
Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 21: 293-308. Dhillon
R, Cumming CE, Cumming DC. Psychological well-being and coping patterns in infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2000; 74: 702-06..
Donkor ES, Sandall J. The impact perceived stigma and mediating social factors on infertility–related stress among woman seeking infertility treatment in Southern Ghana. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65: 1683-94.
Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği’nin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Derg. 2001; 12: 17-25. Gülseren
L, Cetinay P, Tokatlioğlu B, Sarıkaya OO, Gülseren S, Kurt S. Depression and anxiety levels in infertile Turkish women. J Reprod Med. 2006; 51: 421Holter H, Anderheim L, Bergh C, Möller A. First IVF treatment - short-term impact on psychological wellbeing and the marital relationship. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 3295-02.
Matsubayashi H, Hosaka T, Izumi S, Suzuki T, Kondo A, Makino T. Increased depression and anxiety in infertile Japanese women resulting from lack of husband’s support and feelings of stress. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004; 26: 398-404.
Monga M, Alexandrescu B, Katz SE, Stein M, Ganiats T. Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment and sexual function. Adult Urol. 2004; 63: 126-30.
Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Wozny M. The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men’s and women’s response to infertility. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57:113-20.
Newton CR, Sherrard W, Glavac I. The Fertility Problem Inventory: measuring perceived infertilityrelated stress. Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 54-62.
Norten JE, Schilling EA, Couchman GM, Walmer DK. Sexual satisfaction and functioning in patients seeking infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2003; 76: Pasch LA, Dunkel- Schetter C, Christensen A. Differences between husbands’ and wives’ approach to infertility affect marital communication and adjustment. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77: 1241-7.
Peterson BD, Newton CR, Feingold T. Anxiety and sexual stress in men and women undergoing infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88: 911-4.
Ramezanzadeh F, Aghssa MM, Jafarabadi M, Zayeri F: Alterations of sexual desire and satisfaction in male partners of infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85: 139-43.
Repokari L, Punamaki RL, Unkila-Kallio L, Vilska S, Poikkeus P, Sinkkonen J et al. Infertility treatment and marital relationships: a 1-year prospective study among successfully treated ART couples and their controls. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 1481-91.
Saleh RA, Ranga GM, Raina R, Nelson DR, Agarwal A. Sexual dysfunction in men undergoing infertility evaluation: a cohort observational study. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79: 909-12. Schindel
AW, Nelson CJ, Naughton CK, Ohebshalom, Mulhall JP. Sexual function and quality of life in the male partner of infertile couples: prevalence and correlates of dysfunction. J Urol. 2008; 179: 1056-9.
Schmidt L, Holstein B, Christensen U, Boivin J. Does infertility cause marital benefit? An epidemiological study of 2250 women and men in fertility treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 59: 244Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: A new scale for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976; 38: 15-28.
Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Minnen A, Kremer JAM, Kraaimaat FM. A longitudinal, prospective study on emotional adjustment before, during and after consecutive fertility treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 2253-60.
Wright J, Allard M, Lecours A, Sabourin S. Psychosocial distress and infertility: a review of controlled research. Int J Fertil. 1989; 34:126-42..
Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1988; 52: 30-41.
Yazışma Adresi / Address for Correspondence: Dr. Nurdan Eren Bodur Erenköy Ruh ve Sinir Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Sinan Ercan Cad. 23 Kadıköy 34736 İSTANBUL e-mail:nurdaneren @gmail.com geliş tarihi/received :24.08.2012 kabul tarihi/accepted:05.10.2012