___

• Abbot, G., Bienvenue, L., Damarin, S., Kramarae, C., Jepkemboi, G., & Strawn, C. (2007). Gender equity in the use of educational technology. In S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (pp. 191–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Akyol, Z. & Garrison, D. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
• Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231- 246.
• Alavi, M., Marakas, G., & Yoo, Y. (2002). A comparative study of technologies for distance learning. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404-415
• Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-instructional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 133-136
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73-75
• Astleitner, H., & Steinberg, R. (2005). Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes. AACE Journal, 13 (1), 47-63
• Bentz, D. (2009). Online and face-to-face classes: A comparative analysis of teaching presence and instructor satisfaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
• Carlon, S., Bennett-Woods, D., Berg, B., Claywell, L., LeDuc, K., Marcisz, N., Mulhall, M., Noteboom,T., Snedden, T., Whalen, K., & Zenon, L. (2012). The community of inquiry instrument: Validation and results in online health care disciplines. Computers & Education, 59, 215 –221.
• Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A.
• Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ:
• Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Corrallo, S. (1994). The progress of a study identifying the speaking and communication skills of graduate student. 1994 NCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college students’ competency in speech communication. Armadale, VA.
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
• Garrison, D., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.
• Garrison, D. & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Garrison, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31-36.
• Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge.
• Garrison, D. R,. Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
• Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. In J. Bourne & J. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (Vol. 4). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
• Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72
• Gibson, A., Ice, P., Mitchell, R., & Kupczynski, L. (2012). An inquiry into relationships between demographic factors and teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Internet Learning, 1(1), 7-17.
• Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 14-30
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
• Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J., Oliver, K. M., Glazer, E. M., & Sharma, P. (2003). Cognitive and learning factors in Web-based distance learning environments. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 245-260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• Karami, R. (2011). Factor infusing achievement motivation in leadership role of extension agents in Iran (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
• Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 763-777
• Krish, P., Maros, M., & Stapa, S. (2012). Sociocultural factors and social presence in an online learning environment: GEMA Online.™ Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 201-213
• Lewis, J. (2011). The computer ate my classroom: Assessing student interactions, perceived learning, and satisfaction in online community college career technical education courses. ProQuest LLC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Southern Mississippi.
• Lord, G. & Lomicka, L. (2008). Blended learning in teacher education: An investigation of classroom community across media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 158-174.
• Lu, J., Yu, C. S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information & Management, 40, 497-507
• Maddrell, D. (2011). Community of inquiry framework and learning outcomes (Unpublished
• doctoral dissertation). Old Dominion University. Norfolk, Virginia, United States.
• Ong, C. H. & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829
• Ozturk, E. (2012). An adaptation of the community of inquiry index: The study of validity and
• reliability, Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 408-422.
• Patrizi, A. (2010). The impact of online faculty characteristics on student satisfaction via the community of inquiry framework. ProQuest LLC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). TUI University.
• Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 349–359
• Rovai, A, Wighting, M, & Lucking, R. (2004). The classroom and school community inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research. Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 263 - 280
• Rovai, A, Wighting, M., Baker, J., & Grooms, L. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 7-13
• Rovai, A. & Baker, J. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 31-44.
• Ruhlandt, R. (2010). Differences in retention, social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in fully online and blended courses. ProQuest LLC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Regents University.
• Shea, P., Sau-Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190
• Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 35-44
• Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2009b). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers and Education, 52(3), 543-553.
• Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25(6), 805-818.
• Swan, K. & Ice, P. (2010). The Community of Inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 1-4.
• Taplin, M. & Jegede, O. (2001). Gender differences in factors influencing achievement of distance education students. Open Learning, 16(2), 133-154
• Tu, C. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34-45
• Vaughan, N. (2010). Designing for a blended community of inquiry. In T. Joutsenvirta & L. Myyry (Eds.) Blended Learning in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
• Yukselturk, E. & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83
• Yukselturk, E. & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12-22.
• Correspondence: Rouhollah Khodabandelou, Doctoral Student, Department of Educational
• Technology, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.