Çocuk Diş Hekimliğinde Fluorid Salınımı Yapan Güncel Restoratif Materyaller

Restoratif dental materyallerden salınan florür demineralizasyonu önleyici, remineralizasyonu arttırıcı etkisinin yanında antibakteriyal etki de göstererek ikincil çürük oluşumunu engellemektedir. Günümüzde florür salımı yapan dental materyallerin çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanımı önem kazanmıştır. Bu materyaller arasında, geleneksel cam iyonomer simanlar (GCİS) (yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomer simanlar ve sermet simanlar), rezin modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar (RMCİS), nano-iyonomer simanlar, kompomerler, cam karbomerler, giomerler ve florür içeren kompozit rezinler bulunmaktadır. Bu makalede çocuk diş hekimliğinde florür salımı yapan restoratif dental materyaller güncel literatür ışığında incelenmiştir.

Current Fluoride-releasing Restorative Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry

Fluoride released from restorative materials decreases demineralization, increases remineralization, and inhibits secondary caries with its antibacterial effect. The use of fluoride-releasing dental materials in pediatric dentistry has currently gained importance. Conventional glass ionomer cements (high-viscosity glass and cermet ionomer cements), resin-modified glass ionomer cements, nano-ionomer cements, compomers, glass carbomers, giomers and fluoride-containing composites are among the fluoride-releasing dental materials. In this study, fluoride-releasing properties of restorative dental materials used in pediatric dentistry were reviewed with respect to the current literature.

___

  • Farrugia C, Camilleri J. Antimicrobial properties of conventional restora- tive filling materials and advances in antimicrobial properties of compo- site resins and glass ionomer cements-A literature review. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 89-99. [CrossRef]
  • Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE. McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. Ninth edit. 2011, Missouri, Mosby Elsevier Inc. pp. 192-201.
  • Alexander SA, Ripa LW. Effects of Self-Applied Topical Fluoride Preparati- ons in Orthodontic Patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 424-30.
  • Dionysopoulosa D. The effect of fluoride-releasing restorative materials on inhibition of secondary caries formation. Fluoride 2014; 47: 258-65.
  • Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 503-8. [CrossRef]
  • Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Pataridou A. Fluoride release and uptake by four new fluoride releasing restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 866-72. [CrossRef]
  • Mungara J, Philip J, Joseph E, Rajendran S, Elangovan A, Selvaraju G. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge of pre-reacted glass ionomer composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer with daily fluoride exposure: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013; 31: 234-9. [CrossRef]
  • Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative ma- terials - fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 343-62. [CrossRef]
  • Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-io- nomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013; 10: 411-20.
  • Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N., Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary flu- oride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2013; 32: 296-304. [CrossRef]
  • Dhull KS, Nandlal B. Effect of low-concentration daily topical fluoride application on fluoride release of giomer and compomer: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011; 29: 39-45. [CrossRef]
  • Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J 1972; 132: 133-5. [CrossRef]
  • Kaya T, Tirali RE. Cam iyonomer simanlardaki gelişmeler. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013; Suppl 7: 71-7.
  • Marwah N. Textbook of Pediatric Dentistry. 2009, New Delhi, Jaypee Bro- thers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. pp: 257-78.
  • American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Guideline on pediatric restora- tive dentistry. 2012; Referance manual 34: 214-21.
  • Markovic DL, Petrovic BB, Peric TO. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glass-ionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health 2008; 8: 21. [CrossRef]
  • McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-iono- mer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 587-9.
  • Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements a permanent filling materials? Properties, limitations and future trends. Materials 2010, 3: 76-96. [CrossRef]
  • Sidhu SK. Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 Suppl 1: 23-30. [CrossRef]
  • Arbabzadeh-Zavareh F, Gibbs T, Meyers IA, Bouzari M, Mortazavi S, Walsh LJ. Recharge pattern of contemporary glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012; 9: 139-45. [CrossRef]
  • Upadhyay S, Rao A, Shenoy R. Comparison of the amount of fluoride rele- ase from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent (Tehran) 2013; 10: 134-40.
  • Ghajari MF, Torabzadeh H, Safavi N, Sohrabi A, Ardakani FF. Fluoride re- lease from three glass ionomers after exposure to sodium fluoride and acidulated phosphate fluoride gels. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2014; 1: 604-9.
  • Cao DS, Hollis RA, Hicken CB, Christensen RP. Fluoride release from glass io- nomers, glass ionomer/resins and composites. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 184-6.
  • Rao A, Rao A, Sudha P. Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011; 29: 202-4. [CrossRef]
  • Nagaraja Upadhya P, Kishore G. Glass Ionomer Cement – The Different Generations. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2005; 18: 158-65.
  • Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ, Dashper SG, Eakins D, Reynolds EC. In- corporation of casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 914-8. [CrossRef]
  • Yli-Urpo H, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Forsback AP, Vakiparta M. Release of sili- ca, calcium, phosphorus, and fluoride from glass ionomer cement conta- ining bioactive glass. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19: 5-20. [CrossRef]
  • Thanjal NK, Billington RW, Shadid S, Luo J, Hill RG, Pearson GJ. Kinetics of fluoride ion release from dental restorative glass ionomer cements: the influence and radiant heat and glass composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 589-95. [CrossRef]
  • Tamilselvam S, Divyanand MJ, Neelakantan P. Biocompatibility of a Conventional Glass Ionomer, Ceramic Reinforced Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Composite to Fibroblasts: In vitro Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013; 37: 403-6. [CrossRef]
  • Bahadure RN, Pandey RK, Kumar R, Gopal K, Singh RK. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012; 2: 122-6. [CrossRef]
  • Crowley CM, Doyle J, Towler MR, Hill RG, Hampshire S. The influence of capsule geometry amd cement formulation on the apparent viscosity of dental cements. J Dent 2006; 34: 566-73. [CrossRef]
  • Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I. Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2009; 6: 75-81.
  • Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1-year water storage of recent restorative glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 1053-60. [CrossRef]
  • Köroğlu A, Ekren O, Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkın- da bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012; 22: 205-16.
  • Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K. Marginal gap formation and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement: effect of silanized sphe- rical silica filler addition. Dent Mater J. 2004; 23: 305-13. [CrossRef]
  • Selimović-Dragaš M, Hasić-Branković L, Korać F, İapo N, Huseinbegović A, Kobašlija S, Lekić M, et al. In vitro fluoride release from a different kind of conventional and resin modified glass-ionomer cements. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2013; 13: 197-202.
  • Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The fluoride uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent 1998; 26: 591-7. [CrossRef]
  • Uysal T, Yagci A, Uysal B, Akdogan G. Are nano-composites and nano- iono- mers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 78- 82. [CrossRef]
  • Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Neves AA, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, et al. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled re- sin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1347-57. [CrossRef]
  • Neelakantan P, John S, Anand S, Sureshbabu N, Subbarao C. Fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer cement. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 80-5. [CrossRef]
  • Nicholson JW. Polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 615-22. [CrossRef]
  • Bala O. Poliasit-modifiye kompozit rezinler (kompomerler) literatür tara- ması. Cumhuriyet Uni Diş Hek Fak Derg 1998; 1: 113-8.
  • Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-re- leasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 395-402.
  • Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Karantakis P, Papadogiannis Y, Kapetanios H. Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement. J Prosth Dent 2001; 86: 156-64. [CrossRef]
  • Abdul Quader SM, Shamsul Alam M, Bashar AKM, Gafur A, Al Mansur MA. Compressive Strength, Fluoride Release and Recharge of Giomer. Updat Dent Coll J 2012; 2: 28-37.
  • Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley DH. A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-relea- sing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 315-39. [CrossRef]
  • Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in gio- mer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 789-95. [CrossRef]
  • Jingawar MM, Pathak A, Bajwa NK, Sidhu HS. Quantitative assessment of fluoride release and recharge ability of different restorative materials in different media: An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 31-4.
  • Zainuddin N, Karpukhinab N, Law R, Hill R. Characterisation of a remine- ralising Glass Carbomer® ionomer cement by MAS-NMR Spectroscopy. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 1051-58. [CrossRef]
  • Koenraadsa H, Van der Kroona G, Frencken JE. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atrauma- tic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 551-6. [CrossRef]
  • Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical beha- viour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent 2013; 41: 223-30. [CrossRef]
  • Nicholson JW. Fluoride-Releasing Dental Restorative Materials: An Upda- te. Balk J Dent Med 2014; 18: 60-9. [CrossRef]
  • Chen X, Du M, Fan M, Mulder J, Huysmans M, Frencken JE. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1443-50. [CrossRef]
  • Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, et al. One-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Carbomer Fissure Se- alant, a Preliminary Study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2014; 22: 67-71.
  • Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly deve- loped glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 15-21.
  • Xu HH, Moreau JL, Sun L, Chow LC. Novel CaF2 nanocomposite with high strength and fluoride ion release. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 739-45. [CrossRef]
  • Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass iono- mer cement, a compomer and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 93-7. [CrossRef]